Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk



wrote:
In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7
, says...


On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db-
, says....


On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote:


In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa-
, says...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?


Is it really worth it?


YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY
CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE...


There goes THAT friendship (if there was one).


You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican
and fundie.


?;^ )


Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too


Scotty- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list.


?;^ )


Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin'


http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp-
content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg


of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned:


http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg


Sorry...


Scotty


That looks like Tom up there on the hood.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.



But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache
(again, maybe, maybe not)

So I guess I'm still the candidate. ?;^
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 817
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:16:16 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk



wrote:
In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7
, says...


On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db-
, says...


On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote:


In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa-
, says...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?


Is it really worth it?


YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY
CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE...


There goes THAT friendship (if there was one).


You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican
and fundie.


?;^ )


Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too


Scotty- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list.


?;^ )


Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin'


http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp-
content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg


of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned:


http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg


Sorry...


Scotty


That looks like Tom up there on the hood.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.



But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache
(again, maybe, maybe not)

So I guess I'm still the candidate. ?;^


Now that I think about it, you're right.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.
  #24   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 100
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?



Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find
it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered
by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk
the
actual science.



A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer
relevant.


When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically,
you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists
are wrong or lying or ?


....when Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize. Its significance has
diminished - forever.
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 100
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

Harry wrote:
Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?


Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035...
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.

A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer relevant.



And this conclusion is based on what? Surely not your hobnobbing with
Nobel laureates.

No, we just hang out for a few beers a a good football game.


  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 100
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

Harry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?


Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling.
I find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs
2035... and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.


A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer relevant.



When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So,
basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that
renown scientists are wrong or lying or ?



Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper.


I graduated from MIT. And you?
  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

In article 227a52b3-1159-4c95-a5e7-09d0d10c4b38
@f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk



wrote:
In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7
, says...


On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db-
, says...


On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote:


In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa-
, says...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?


Is it really worth it?


YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY
CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE...


There goes THAT friendship (if there was one).


You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican
and fundie.


?;^ )


Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too


Scotty- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list.


?;^ )


Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin'


http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp-
content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg


of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned:


http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg


Sorry...


Scotty


That looks like Tom up there on the hood.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.



But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache
(again, maybe, maybe not)

So I guess I'm still the candidate. ?;^


Uh, no... NO MUSTACHE!!! Tom doesn't do cop face And yes, he has
lighter hair.. You liked those pics huh?
  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Default Scotty and John Can Have At It.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7
,
says...

On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db-
, says...







On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote:

In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa-
, says...

Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?

YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY
CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE...

There goes THAT friendship (if there was one).

You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican
and fundie.

?;^ )

Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too

Scotty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list.

?;^ )


Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin'

http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp-
content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg

of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned:

http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg

Sorry...


Scotty


You add much more to the list, you'll sound like Olbermann talking
about Scott Brown.


Yeah, but I would have to see Browns face while I was looking into a
flame...

Scotty
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ships_36_52 ft John schooner , Heron designed by John Alden in 1929 and built in Camfen in 2003, sails on Penobscot Bay, Maine_Allison Langley_sqs squeegees Tall Ship Photos 0 August 19th 09 09:07 PM
Hey, John, Tim, Scotty NotNow[_3_] General 36 August 15th 09 05:09 PM
Ping John and Scotty: Speaking of Pancakes NotNow[_3_] General 3 August 8th 09 12:53 PM
(OT) Gift for John H, NOYB, John Gaguin and other right wingers Jim General 1 March 10th 04 05:09 AM
Scotty! John Wanyes Dingy is for sell on E-Bay Joe ASA 6 November 8th 03 04:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017