| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#41
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
"Bruce" wrote in message
news  nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? Is that on the east coast? Unless they moved it. Well, you never know. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#42
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 23, 11:26*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message news
nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:T96dnR5w34D9mMTWnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganew s.com... nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling.. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035.... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. *And you? Is that on the east coast? Unless they moved it. Well, you never know. -- Nom=de=Plume You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not average. |
|
#43
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:26 pm, wrote: wrote in message news
nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling.. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035.... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? Is that on the east coast? Unless they moved it. Well, you never know. -- Nom=de=Plume You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not average. Average in intellect? |
|
#44
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
"Bruce" wrote in message
... TopBassDog wrote: On Jan 23, 11:26 pm, wrote: wrote in message news
nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling.. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035.... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? Is that on the east coast? Unless they moved it. Well, you never know. -- Nom=de=Plume You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not average. Average in intellect? No, he's just a jerk. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#45
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 24, 12:58*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:26*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message news nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:T96dnR5w34D9mMTWnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganew s.com... nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. *And you? Is that on the east coast? Unless they moved it. Well, you never know. -- Nom=de=Plume You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not average. Ya, nom=de=plume, you gotta be BELOW average to reason with top bass douchebag ! Thats where his mentality level is...Geeeese. He rode the short bus to school. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
