Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?



Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.


A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer
relevant.


And this conclusion is based on what? Surely not your hobnobbing with
Nobel laureates.

Harry wrote:
Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?


Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035...
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.

A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer relevant.


And this conclusion is based on what? Surely not your hobnobbing with
Nobel laureates.
No, we just hang out for a few beers a a good football game.