bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:59 -0500, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H
wrote:





It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.


now let's see...which justices voted to allow even MORE corruption in
the system?

oh...the conservative ones



Cite?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247...supreme_court/


"The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony
Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more
conservative colleagues.

Strongly disagreeing, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent,
"The court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected
institutions around the nation."

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor
joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the
courtroom.

You did say corruption, right? Where was that in your cite?

Bruce wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:59 -0500, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H
wrote:





It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.


now let's see...which justices voted to allow even MORE corruption in
the system?

oh...the conservative ones



Cite?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247...supreme_court/


"The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony
Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more
conservative colleagues.

Strongly disagreeing, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent,
"The court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected
institutions around the nation."

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor
joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the
courtroom.

You did say corruption, right? Where was that in your cite?


Bruce, apparently, is another right-winger who cannot think in the
abstract.

Figures.

Harry wrote:
Bruce wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:59 -0500, wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H
wrote:



It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money,
but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.

now let's see...which justices voted to allow even MORE corruption in
the system?

oh...the conservative ones


Cite?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247...supreme_court/


"The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony
Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more
conservative colleagues.

Strongly disagreeing, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent,
"The court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected
institutions around the nation."

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor
joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the
courtroom.
You did say corruption, right? Where was that in your cite?


Bruce, apparently, is another right-winger who cannot think in the
abstract.

Figures.

So I should have to imagine what his point is when he posts an invalid cite?