On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:08:38 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:11:59 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


of course you prefer 25% unemployment for the middle class. after all,
let 'em eat cake, right?



We probably are near that now. Where ate the jobs? Where is the potential
for private sector jobs under this stimulus stuff.

unemployment isnt 25%. i know for you, the fact the middle class is
suffering but not destroyed, causes you sleeplessness.

but with your solution, the right would be happy to see families in
the streets

On 1/25/10 6:39 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:08:38 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:11:59 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


of course you prefer 25% unemployment for the middle class. after all,
let 'em eat cake, right?



We probably are near that now. Where ate the jobs? Where is the potential
for private sector jobs under this stimulus stuff.

unemployment isnt 25%. i know for you, the fact the middle class is
suffering but not destroyed, causes you sleeplessness.

but with your solution, the right would be happy to see families in
the streets



There are a couple of Republican moderates here who understand and
appreciate the social compact that should exist between employer and
employee, and the importance of a strong middle class, and then there
are conservatives like Bilious Bill who see workers as only an asset to
exploit.