On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:42 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"CalifBill" wrote in message
om...



35k is not dire straights.



With four kids???? You're cracked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


And you are clueless to the real world.



Really. Please show us where in the US that $35K/year for a family with four
kids is doing well... go for it.

for the right wing, $35K is 35K too much for a family of 4.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:42 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"CalifBill" wrote in message
news:gpudnR6F_LQuacHWnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@earthlink. com...



35k is not dire straights.



With four kids???? You're cracked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


And you are clueless to the real world.



Really. Please show us where in the US that $35K/year for a family with
four
kids is doing well... go for it.

for the right wing, $35K is 35K too much for a family of 4.


Blow it out your ass, idiot. It is not easy street, but it is a hell of
along ways from dire straights.

On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:11:47 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:42 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:



for the right wing, $35K is 35K too much for a family of 4.


Blow it out your ass, idiot. It is not easy street, but it is a hell of
along ways from dire straights.

and the right will soon change THAT by taking even that money

"CalifBill" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:42 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"CalifBill" wrote in message
news:gpudnR6F_LQuacHWnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@earthlink .com...



35k is not dire straights.



With four kids???? You're cracked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


And you are clueless to the real world.



Really. Please show us where in the US that $35K/year for a family with
four
kids is doing well... go for it.

for the right wing, $35K is 35K too much for a family of 4.


Blow it out your ass, idiot. It is not easy street, but it is a hell of
along ways from dire straights.



Right... four kids... and that's gross salary.

--
Nom=de=Plume