Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CalifBill" wrote in message
news ![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:39:42 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:31:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: This is the reason I believe legislation is needed to encourage small business startups and expansion. It's not the time to penalize small businesses that are struggling to stay alive. High capital gains taxes is part of the penalty, both for those who invest in their own business or for those who provide funding for one. Eisboch The UAW is an aberration that only demonstrates the "union bubble". The UAW managed to drive compensation up, far beyond the value of the work and we had a correction. Just like those cracker box houses that were selling for $300k a few years ago, sanity has returned to the car business ... in Tennessee. Putting a bearing in a transmission case and hitting it with a soft hammer is not worth $50,000 a year (what my wife's nephew was doing, right out of high school). He did have to pick the case up and put it on the belt. That is why it was an entry level job. (Kokomo Chrysler plant) It's good to have a dad who is a shop steward I guess. actually what happened was that GM treated the american consumer like an ATM. the japanese treated american consumers like we were consumers. GM managers were accountants. toyota's are engineers who focused on building cars. it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. Was the UAW and management that caused the meltdown. No quality from either management or UAW. go to Japan and Deming's photo is in every manufacturing company. The father of quality control. Actually, I agree with you, mostly. Management is typically the first out of the block, as far as culpability for business failure goes (poor, exploitive management practices gave birth to the union movement in the US), but history is pretty clear that the UAW didn't do right by its members nor by the company. There's a big difference between the union management (see previous paragraph about management culpability) and the regular worker, however. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message news ![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:39:42 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:31:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: This is the reason I believe legislation is needed to encourage small business startups and expansion. It's not the time to penalize small businesses that are struggling to stay alive. High capital gains taxes is part of the penalty, both for those who invest in their own business or for those who provide funding for one. Eisboch The UAW is an aberration that only demonstrates the "union bubble". The UAW managed to drive compensation up, far beyond the value of the work and we had a correction. Just like those cracker box houses that were selling for $300k a few years ago, sanity has returned to the car business ... in Tennessee. Putting a bearing in a transmission case and hitting it with a soft hammer is not worth $50,000 a year (what my wife's nephew was doing, right out of high school). He did have to pick the case up and put it on the belt. That is why it was an entry level job. (Kokomo Chrysler plant) It's good to have a dad who is a shop steward I guess. actually what happened was that GM treated the american consumer like an ATM. the japanese treated american consumers like we were consumers. GM managers were accountants. toyota's are engineers who focused on building cars. it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. Was the UAW and management that caused the meltdown. No quality from either management or UAW. go to Japan and Deming's photo is in every manufacturing company. The father of quality control. Actually, I agree with you, mostly. Management is typically the first out of the block, as far as culpability for business failure goes (poor, exploitive management practices gave birth to the union movement in the US), but history is pretty clear that the UAW didn't do right by its members nor by the company. There's a big difference between the union management (see previous paragraph about management culpability) and the regular worker, however. -- Nom=de=Plume The worker votes for the union management, so they get the blame also. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
There's a big difference between the union management (see previous paragraph about management culpability) and the regular worker, however. There sure is Dippy. Management is holding regular workers back from producing an honest days work. I'm sure Union Management has some attributes. I just can't think of any right now. Perhaps you can. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:52:52 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:39:42 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:31:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: The UAW is an aberration that only demonstrates the "union bubble". The UAW managed to drive compensation up, far beyond the value of the work and we had a correction. Just like those cracker box houses that were selling for $300k a few years ago, sanity has returned to the car business ... in Tennessee. Putting a bearing in a transmission case and hitting it with a soft hammer is not worth $50,000 a year (what my wife's nephew was doing, right out of high school). He did have to pick the case up and put it on the belt. That is why it was an entry level job. (Kokomo Chrysler plant) It's good to have a dad who is a shop steward I guess. actually what happened was that GM treated the american consumer like an ATM. the japanese treated american consumers like we were consumers. GM managers were accountants. toyota's are engineers who focused on building cars. it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. Was the UAW and management that caused the meltdown. No quality from either management or UAW. go to Japan and Deming's photo is in every manufacturing company. The father of quality control. agree to a certain extent. i used to work for bell labs..they invented much of modern quality control (most business still use the 'western electric rules' for statistical process control) many japanese auto plants are unionized. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust | General | |||
River Ice Breaking 04 | Tall Ship Photos | |||
breaking news | General | |||
Evinrude E-TEC wins 24 hr. race in Rouen France | General | |||
Republican Wins Ohio Congressional Race | General |