Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/01/2010 5:12 PM, Bruce wrote:
John H wrote: On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:00:48 -0500, wrote: "C. Mor wrote in message ... What a gal huh? She is running the screwiest campaign up here I've seen in a long time. The radio airways are saturated with what are intended to be negative ads about Brown but they miss there mark. In them the name "Scott Brown" and the word "Republican" is repeated over and over with obscure references to his campaign stump speeches or position statements that are not very clear and really don't register to the listener. Her name never comes up until the end when in a softer, fast spoken acknowledgement of "paid for by the Coakley campaign committee" or something like that. To the casual radio listener, all that sticks in one's head is "Scott Brown" and "Republican". It will be interesting to see what that recall produces on Tuesday. Eisboch Hey, if I bring myself, my wife, my kids, and grandkids, do you think we could get registered to vote in Massachusetts by ACORN, and then surprise them with a Republican vote? Just wondering. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous They'll set you up with absentee ballots. Democrat chad? I often wonder why government has in essnce sabotaged electronic voting. If done right, it would be far better than the back door where cards are moved. I often wonder just how democratic hand counted votes really are. Say an electronic system that posted the vote real time to 8 different sources PLUS a paper copy. All 9 should agree. Since all 9 will go to different groups, univerities, state governments, maybe even CNBC and Fox... all should agree. If one is out but the other 8 agree, the corruption is known. They all must announce the tally at teh same time inside of 5 minutes of poll close. Makes it much harder to stack the deck and results before bed time. Let the new age pony, the internet deliver.... Maybe what the government really is scared of is that such a secure system could in fact be used directly on maters the congress and senate do today! That is, senate/congress must sell the people on the ideas and then the people vote directly. A corruption bill like GM would fall flat on it's ass. So would other bailout corruptions and debt spend. Removes the lobster dinners and cash incentives from the representatives. Neuters the back room deal. Bet many statistical annomolies in even recent election results would disappear. Which is why they want flawed, cheap systems that fail. Keep the power in the back room deals that sell us all out. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This is Martha Coakley in action... | General | |||
This is what Martha Coakley believes. | General | |||
This is Martha Coakley in action... | General | |||
Martha Coakley: I will deny life saving treatment | General | |||
Boston Globe: Martha Coakley is a slippery weasle | General |