Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html

'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

On 17/01/2010 11:48 AM, Harry Krause wrote:
John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html


'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Isn't socilaism great as long as someone else pays for it?

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:30:13 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/01/2010 11:48 AM, Harry Krause wrote:
John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html


'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Isn't socilaism great as long as someone else pays for it?

ditto for capitalism

working folks just paid for the socialism for the rich

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 17/01/2010 11:48 AM, Harry Krause wrote:
John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html


'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Isn't socilaism great as long as someone else pays for it?


Fortunately, you don't have to worry about it, since you're not planning on
coming back to the US.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 17/01/2010 11:48 AM, Harry Krause wrote:
John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html



'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Isn't socilaism great as long as someone else pays for it?

Yes it is. I need to go out to eat tonight, can I send you the check?

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

On 17/01/2010 12:40 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:30:13 -0700,
wrote:

On 17/01/2010 11:48 AM, Harry Krause wrote:
John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html


'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Isn't socilaism great as long as someone else pays for it?

ditto for capitalism

working folks just paid for the socialism for the rich

Agreed. Bailouts are socialism for the rich and that is why Obamanomics
and Democrats are not working to fix the economy. They are 100% in
denial of the basic issues at hand.

America is broke from overspending. This includes government, not just
debt mongers. Until the WORKING parts of this country (including Canada)
get more money there is an economic imbalance that will drive the
depression. At least Reagan had it half right, lower taxes.

Imagine if Obama/democrats lowered income taxes by say $2 trillion
instead of funneling it to back room corruption we would be in an
economic boom by now. If they were even wiser, cutting federal spending
by $2 trillion, the depression/recession would be over without the
unsustainable debt bubble.

But now it is worse than ever, with the debt now racked up and a tolet
economy, democrats just made it a whole lot worse than if they did
nothing. Democrats including Obama sold out the backbone of the USA,
the moddle class. Now tax-enslaved for corrupt corporations of America.

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

On 17/01/2010 12:45 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 17/01/2010 11:48 AM, Harry Krause wrote:
John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yds4pu9 or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011602884.html


'Nuff said.

--
John H

"If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!"
--Anonymous

Why is everyone so upset about this, I mean there are 49 other states
who can pick up the slack. What is the big deal?

Isn't socilaism great as long as someone else pays for it?

Fortunately, you don't have to worry about it, since you're not planning on
coming back to the US.

Wrong'obama-your mama influences us up here. The official opposition
leader is from the same alumni as Obama, preaching the same crap of
debt-tax spend up here. We are where the US will be under Obamanation.

Canada contributed over $100 billion of debt-corruption-bailout spend in
2009, given our population base at least as big of a screwing. And they
are American corporations, not Canadian. In fact, GM/Chrylser/banks
left Ottawa so far in the hole they didn't touch NorTel...let it die.

It isn't just California, Ontario, Quebec and BC are in financial issues
now too, same reason, too much liberal debt-spending.

If I move to south or central America, get that cheap 15% foreign
investment tax rate.

Why would I move into a high tax rate area? To pay for Obamanation? I
am not that charitable.

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

Canuck57 wrote:


If I move to south or central America, get that cheap 15% foreign
investment tax rate.

Move to Venezuela or Chile. I'll contribute $1.00 American to your move.
Take herringcrap with you.

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

working folks just paid for the socialism for the rich

Agreed. Bailouts are socialism for the rich and that is why Obamanomics
and Democrats are not working to fix the economy. They are 100% in
denial of the basic issues at hand.

it's the only channel for money the rich have left us. the program was
started by bernanke, chairman of the fed under a guy named bush, who
was president for the last 8 years


America is broke from overspending.

america is broke from the rich gaming the financial system, knowing
that the middle class would be forced to bail them out. conservatives
sold the 'free market' fundamentalism long enough so that any
regulation of derivatives, and other financial instruments was washed
away....

and they're fighting to prevent regulation today. the GOP, of course,
is doing the heavy lifting for wall street, calling any type of
regulation 'interference' in the 'free market'...whatever that is

This includes government, not just
debt mongers. Until the WORKING parts of this country (including Canada)
get more money there is an economic imbalance that will drive the
depression. At least Reagan had it half right, lower taxes.

reagan was one of the biggest spenders in history AND the middle class
made NO economic gains under his 8 years of mismanagement. the rich
got IMMENSELY richer

you guys just keep shoveling this stuff, don't you?

reagan was a socialist...for the rich


Imagine if Obama/democrats lowered income taxes

the GOP has, over the last 30 years, reduced capital gains from 38% to
15%

how'd that work out?


by say $2 trillion
instead of funneling it to back room corruption we would be in an
economic boom by now. If they were even wiser, cutting federal spending
by $2 trillion, the depression/recession would be over without the
unsustainable debt bubble.

fine. we can cut the dept of defense. $640B right away.

what you gonna cut?


But now it is worse than ever, with the debt now racked up and a tolet
economy, democrats just made it a whole lot worse than if they did
nothing. Democrats including Obama sold out the backbone of the USA,
the moddle class. Now tax-enslaved for corrupt corporations of America.

no economist agrees with you; neither conservative nobel winner gary
becker, nor liberal nobel winner paul krugman.

Proof - Liberals could screw up a wet dream...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:10:19 -0500, "H :) K"
wrote:

Canuck57 wrote:


If I move to south or central America, get that cheap 15% foreign
investment tax rate.

Move to Venezuela or Chile. I'll contribute $1.00 American to your move.
Take herringcrap with you.

i'll see your dollar and raise you a buck to get rid of him...