In article 1dcff7d2-91d1-4f92-9926-
,
says...

On Jan 16, 9:24*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 404d31ee-bf32-4d2c-afec-64c104a06362
@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says...







On Jan 16, 2:00*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:31:39 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:57:45 -0500, John H wrote:

...to the USA, where he would have recieved all the rights and
privileges of citizenship including ACLU protection, the best of defense
attorneys, good food, air conditioning, and best of all, no questions.

http://tinyurl.com/y9tb78d

If only you knew what you were talking about. *One of the hijackers of
Flight 73, did make it to the USA. *He's serving a 160 year sentence at
ADX Florence.

You tell me which is the more efficient way of handling the problem.
--

John H

Trial by jury in the USA. There are a greater percentage of those
terrorist trials resulting in conviction than those in military court.

Do you understand that trying them in the US in public view is a
nightmare for intelligence ops?

Scotty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So? That'll mean they have to do the job we are paying them for.

Oh great, you got a party line here too... Anyone with a brain knows
full well that a lot of evidence available can't be used in an open
courtroom or it would cost lives. If you can't even admit that, there is
no reason to bother with the rest of the conversation...