![]() |
What is wrong with your liberals/
I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the
only one doing so. According to Charity Navigator, too many of my fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the walk. Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals? A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in politically progressive regions of America: while people on the political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype is wrong. The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30 percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families. These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half. |
What is wrong with your liberals/
Harry Krause wrote:
I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the only one doing so. According to Charity Navigator, too many of my fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the walk. Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals? A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in politically progressive regions of America: while people on the political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype is wrong. The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30 percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families. These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half. Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. |
What is wrong with your liberals/
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:
Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the right believes |
What is wrong with your liberals/
On Jan 15, 4:55*pm, Harry Krause wrote:
I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the only one doing so. * According to Charity Navigator, too many of my fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the walk. Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals? A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in politically progressive regions of America: while people on the political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype is wrong. The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30 percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families. These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half. "Priceless"!! |
What is wrong with your liberals/
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote: Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the right believes Wow, so you don't contribute to charity because you figure if there are enough dead people in the streets maybe the government will step in? Do you even give as much as a Canadian gives to charity? |
What is wrong with your liberals/
Jack wrote:
On Jan 15, 4:55 pm, Harry Krause wrote: These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half. "Priceless"!! who is the Charity Navigator you ask? Charity Navigator is an independent, non-profit organization that evaluates American charities. Its stated goal is "to advance a more efficient and responsive philanthropic marketplace by evaluating the financial health of America's largest charities." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_Navigator http://www.charitynavigator.org/ |
What is wrong with your liberals/
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:10:18 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote: Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the right believes Wow, so you don't contribute to charity because you figure if there are enough dead people in the streets maybe the government will step in? chuckle no i'm not a GOP member. libs prevent death. right winers cause 'em |
What is wrong with your liberals/
On Jan 15, 5:54*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote: Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. conservatives give their pittances to their churches. *most liberals dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the right believes What an idiot you are. Churches are some of the largest institutes that take care of the destitute. Just one of thousands of examples: http://www.olivergospelmission.org/ You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund this highly successful organization. After all, as you say, liberals don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow man themselves. They'd rather have some faceless government agency do it for them. |
What is wrong with your liberals/
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote: On Jan 15, 5:54*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote: Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. conservatives give their pittances to their churches. *most liberals dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the right believes What an idiot you are. Churches are some of the largest institutes that take care of the destitute. Just one of thousands of examples: http://www.olivergospelmission.org/ and churches basically are large machines for making money and bribing politicians to prevent justice You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund this highly successful organization. After all, as you say, liberals don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow man themselves. They'd rather have some faceless government agency do it for them. i guess you've never head of the red cross. you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the useful red cross |
What is wrong with your liberals/
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Jan 15, 5:54 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote: Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found right here. conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the right believes What an idiot you are. Churches are some of the largest institutes that take care of the destitute. Just one of thousands of examples: http://www.olivergospelmission.org/ and churches basically are large machines for making money and bribing politicians to prevent justice You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund this highly successful organization. After all, as you say, liberals don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow man themselves. They'd rather have some faceless government agency do it for them. i guess you've never head of the red cross. you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the useful red cross No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give very little of your money to any charity. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com