BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   What is wrong with your liberals/ (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/113056-what-wrong-your-liberals.html)

Harry Krause[_2_] January 15th 10 09:55 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the
only one doing so. According to Charity Navigator, too many of my
fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the
walk.

Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals?
A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in
politically progressive regions of America: while people on the
political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to
be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the
political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus
the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts
of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype
is wrong.

The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more
likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In
the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30
percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And
this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of
income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data
earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families.

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In
2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year,
and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were
“conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth
of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put
this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like
conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by
nearly half.

HK[_5_] January 15th 10 10:31 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
Harry Krause wrote:
I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the
only one doing so. According to Charity Navigator, too many of my
fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the walk.

Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals?
A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in
politically progressive regions of America: while people on the
political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to
be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the
political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus
the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts
of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype
is wrong.

The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more
likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In
the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30
percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And
this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of
income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data
earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families.

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In
2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year,
and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were
“conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth
of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put
this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like
conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by
nearly half.


Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.

bpuharic January 15th 10 10:54 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:



Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.


conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes


Jack[_3_] January 15th 10 10:54 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Jan 15, 4:55*pm, Harry Krause wrote:
I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the
only one doing so. * According to Charity Navigator, too many of my
fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the
walk.

Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals?
A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in
politically progressive regions of America: while people on the
political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to
be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the
political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus
the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts
of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype
is wrong.

The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more
likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In
the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30
percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And
this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of
income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data
earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families.

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In
2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year,
and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were
“conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth
of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put
this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like
conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by
nearly half.


"Priceless"!!

Harry Krause[_2_] January 15th 10 11:10 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:


Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.


conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes

Wow, so you don't contribute to charity because you figure if there are
enough dead people in the streets maybe the government will step in?


Do you even give as much as a Canadian gives to charity?

Harry Krause[_2_] January 15th 10 11:12 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
Jack wrote:
On Jan 15, 4:55 pm, Harry Krause wrote:



These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In
2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year,
and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were
“conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth
of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put
this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like
conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by
nearly half.


"Priceless"!!


who is the Charity Navigator you ask?

Charity Navigator is an independent, non-profit organization that
evaluates American charities. Its stated goal is "to advance a more
efficient and responsive philanthropic marketplace by evaluating the
financial health of America's largest charities."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_Navigator

http://www.charitynavigator.org/

bpuharic January 15th 10 11:14 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:10:18 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:


Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.


conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes

Wow, so you don't contribute to charity because you figure if there are
enough dead people in the streets maybe the government will step in?


chuckle no i'm not a GOP member. libs prevent death. right winers
cause 'em

Jack[_3_] January 15th 10 11:14 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Jan 15, 5:54*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:

Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.


conservatives give their pittances to their churches. *most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes


What an idiot you are. Churches are some of the largest institutes
that take care of the destitute. Just one of thousands of examples:

http://www.olivergospelmission.org/

You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund
this highly successful organization. After all, as you say, liberals
don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow
man themselves. They'd rather have some faceless government agency do
it for them.

bpuharic January 15th 10 11:46 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 5:54*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:

Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.


conservatives give their pittances to their churches. *most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes


What an idiot you are. Churches are some of the largest institutes
that take care of the destitute. Just one of thousands of examples:

http://www.olivergospelmission.org/


and churches basically are large machines for making money and bribing
politicians to prevent justice


You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund
this highly successful organization. After all, as you say, liberals
don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow
man themselves. They'd rather have some faceless government agency do
it for them.


i guess you've never head of the red cross.

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross


Harry Krause[_2_] January 15th 10 11:51 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 5:54 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:

Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.
conservatives give their pittances to their churches. most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes

What an idiot you are. Churches are some of the largest institutes
that take care of the destitute. Just one of thousands of examples:

http://www.olivergospelmission.org/


and churches basically are large machines for making money and bribing
politicians to prevent justice

You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund
this highly successful organization. After all, as you say, liberals
don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow
man themselves. They'd rather have some faceless government agency do
it for them.


i guess you've never head of the red cross.

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.

bpuharic January 15th 10 11:58 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:


you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.


a church isnt a charity no matter how the right defines it. it's a
parasite


HK[_5_] January 16th 10 12:01 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.


a church isnt a charity no matter how the right defines it. it's a
parasite



You do realize you are entertaining an ID spoofer...none of these Harry
Krause posts are from me. You might want to look at the headers.

bpuharic January 16th 10 12:09 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:01:13 -0500, HK wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.


a church isnt a charity no matter how the right defines it. it's a
parasite



You do realize you are entertaining an ID spoofer...none of these Harry
Krause posts are from me. You might want to look at the headers.


yeah i know. but it's so much fun bitchslapping the trolls

HK[_5_] January 16th 10 12:14 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:01:13 -0500, HK wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.
a church isnt a charity no matter how the right defines it. it's a
parasite


You do realize you are entertaining an ID spoofer...none of these Harry
Krause posts are from me. You might want to look at the headers.


yeah i know. but it's so much fun bitchslapping the trolls


Well, then, slap away.

Harry Krause[_2_] January 16th 10 12:14 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:01:13 -0500, HK wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.
a church isnt a charity no matter how the right defines it. it's a
parasite


You do realize you are entertaining an ID spoofer...none of these Harry
Krause posts are from me. You might want to look at the headers.


yeah i know. but it's so much fun bitchslapping the trolls


You couldn't bitch slap Donnie. You are a step below
Don

bpuharic January 16th 10 12:30 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:14:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:01:13 -0500, HK wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:51:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross

No one said you didn't give any money to charity, just that you give
very little of your money to any charity.
a church isnt a charity no matter how the right defines it. it's a
parasite


You do realize you are entertaining an ID spoofer...none of these Harry
Krause posts are from me. You might want to look at the headers.


yeah i know. but it's so much fun bitchslapping the trolls


You couldn't bitch slap Donnie. You are a step below
Don


put your tongue back in your mouth. here comes another slap...


Jack[_3_] January 16th 10 02:19 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Jan 15, 6:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:



On Jan 15, 5:54*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:31:43 -0500, HK wrote:


Wonder where the stats came from. Sounds about right though. Libs are so
into themselves that nobody else matters. Perfect examples can be found
right here.


conservatives give their pittances to their churches. *most liberals
dont have churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of
the poor rather than lettting them starve in the streets like the
right believes


What an idiot you are. *Churches are some of the largest institutes
that take care of the destitute. *Just one of thousands of examples:


http://www.olivergospelmission.org/


and churches basically are large machines for making money and bribing
politicians to prevent justice



You can be sure that it's conservatives and their donations that fund
this highly successful organization. *After all, as you say, liberals
don't have a church and don't believe in taking care of their fellow
man themselves. *They'd rather have some faceless government agency do
it for them.


i guess you've never head of the red cross.

you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross


But just a post before this you wrote: "most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."

Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?
From their own website: "the Red Cross is an independent, volunteer-
led organization, financially supported by voluntary public
contributions and cost-reimbursement charges." NOT a government
organization.

So what is it, idiot? Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.

This has to be donnie. No one else can present as this stupid.


bpuharic January 16th 10 03:26 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 6:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:


you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross


But just a post before this you wrote: "most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."

Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?


uh...it's a charity. do you know what the thread is about?


So what is it, idiot? Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.

This has to be donnie. No one else can present as this stupid.


you guys think churches do something beside bribe politicians. we give
our money where it counts


GC Boater January 16th 10 03:47 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Jan 15, 4:54*pm, Jack wrote:
On Jan 15, 4:55*pm, Harry Krause wrote:





I have donated over $100.000 to save Haiti, but it is obvious, i am the
only one doing so. * According to Charity Navigator, too many of my
fellow liberals like to talk the talk, but don't know how to walk the
walk.


Who gives the most in America: conservatives or liberals?
A. There is a persistent stereotype about charitable giving in
politically progressive regions of America: while people on the
political right may be hardworking and family-oriented, they tend not to
be very charitable toward the less fortunate. In contrast, those on the
political left care about vulnerable members of society, and are thus
the charitable ones. Understanding “charity” in terms of voluntary gifts
of money (instead of government income redistribution), this stereotype
is wrong.


The fact is that self-described “conservatives” in America are more
likely to give—and give more money—than self-described “liberals.” In
the year 2000, households headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30
percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And
this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of
income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data
earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families..


These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In
2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year,
and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were
“conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth
of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put
this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like
conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by
nearly half.


"Priceless"!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Krausie could have donated much, much more to Haiti if he hadn't
previously donated the proceeds of his father's (you know, the
Atlantic crossing / fireboat welcome dude) multimillion dollar
Evinrude dealership to charity.

Harry Krause[_2_] January 16th 10 03:53 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
GC Boater wrote:
eholds headed by a conservative gave, on average, 30
percent more dollars to charity than households headed by a liberal. And
this discrepancy in monetary donations is not simply an artifact of
income differences. On the contrary, liberal families in these data
earned an average of 6 percent more per year than conservative families.
These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In
2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year,
and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were
“conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth
of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put
this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like
conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by
nearly half.

"Priceless"!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Krausie could have donated much, much more to Haiti if he hadn't
previously donated the proceeds of his father's (you know, the
Atlantic crossing / fireboat welcome dude) multimillion dollar
Evinrude dealership to charity.


That is all you know. I have donated my young bride to Haiti. She
will be giving free social work, free medical treatment and free
psychiatric care for the next 5 years. She will be working on her PhD
in Law and Economics while she is done there, so she will also be able
to give free legal advice and set up a sustainable economy during her
free time.

Then you will have to call her Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen.

Jack[_3_] January 16th 10 12:59 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Jan 15, 10:26*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 6:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:


you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross


But just a post before this you wrote: *"most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."


Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? *You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?


uh...it's a charity. do you know what the thread is about?


Yep... the fact that conservatives give more money than liberals.





So what is it, idiot? *Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? *You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? *It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.


This has to be donnie. *No one else can present as this stupid.


you guys think churches do something beside bribe politicians. we give
our money where it counts


Sorry, you already let the cat out of the bag. You said you believe
in gov agencies to do this work. You liberals believe in high taxes
and gov programs. You give less of your money to charities than
conservatives, while proclaiming you're more compassionate than
conservatives.

Liberals are two-faced, cheap lying *******s.

I'm off to a gun show. Have fun.

HK[_5_] January 16th 10 01:02 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
Jack wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:26 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 6:46 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:
you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross
But just a post before this you wrote: "most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."
Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?

uh...it's a charity. do you know what the thread is about?


Yep... the fact that conservatives give more money than liberals.




So what is it, idiot? Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.
This has to be donnie. No one else can present as this stupid.

you guys think churches do something beside bribe politicians. we give
our money where it counts


Sorry, you already let the cat out of the bag. You said you believe
in gov agencies to do this work. You liberals believe in high taxes
and gov programs. You give less of your money to charities than
conservatives, while proclaiming you're more compassionate than
conservatives.

Liberals are two-faced, cheap lying *******s.

I'm off to a gun show. Have fun.



Many conservatives tend to make their "charitable contributions" to
their mean-spirited, right-winged churches, who use the funds to help
spread their simple-minded agenda, rather than engage in real charitable
work of helping the poor and the sick with sustenance.



Loogypicker[_2_] January 16th 10 03:53 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Jan 16, 7:59*am, Jack wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:26*pm, bpuharic wrote:





On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:


On Jan 15, 6:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:


you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross


But just a post before this you wrote: *"most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."


Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? *You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?


uh...it's a charity. do you know what the thread is about?


Yep... the fact that conservatives give more money than liberals.



So what is it, idiot? *Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? *You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? *It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.


This has to be donnie. *No one else can present as this stupid.


you guys think churches do something beside bribe politicians. we give
our money where it counts


Sorry, you already let the cat out of the bag. *You said you believe
in gov agencies to do this work. *You liberals believe in high taxes
and gov programs. *You give less of your money to charities than
conservatives, while proclaiming you're more compassionate than
conservatives.

Liberals are two-faced, cheap lying *******s.


All of them? What an ass.

HK[_5_] January 16th 10 03:55 PM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 16, 7:59 am, Jack wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:26 pm, bpuharic wrote:





On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:46 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:
you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross
But just a post before this you wrote: "most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."
Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?
uh...it's a charity. do you know what the thread is about?

Yep... the fact that conservatives give more money than liberals.



So what is it, idiot? Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.
This has to be donnie. No one else can present as this stupid.
you guys think churches do something beside bribe politicians. we give
our money where it counts

Sorry, you already let the cat out of the bag. You said you believe
in gov agencies to do this work. You liberals believe in high taxes
and gov programs. You give less of your money to charities than
conservatives, while proclaiming you're more compassionate than
conservatives.

Liberals are two-faced, cheap lying *******s.


All of them? What an ass.


He has you in mind.

bpuharic January 17th 10 01:02 AM

What is wrong with your liberals/
 
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:59:56 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 10:26*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 15, 6:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:13 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:


you give your money to your useless churches we give ours to the
useful red cross


But just a post before this you wrote: *"most liberals dont have
churches. we believe in govt organziations to take care of the
poor..."


Now you're holding up the Red Cross as your organization? *You do
realize that the Red Cross isn't a government organization, right?


uh...it's a charity. do you know what the thread is about?


Yep... the fact that conservatives give more money than liberals.


they give more money to churches

so far the biggest use of this money churches have done is to pay off
victims of pedophilian






So what is it, idiot? *Government organzations like you first said, or
the Red Cross after you changed your story? *You do realize that
conservatives and *churches* donate to the Red Cross, right? *It's NOT
a liberal organization, idiot.


This has to be donnie. *No one else can present as this stupid.


you guys think churches do something beside bribe politicians. we give
our money where it counts


Sorry, you already let the cat out of the bag. You said you believe
in gov agencies to do this work. You liberals believe in high taxes
and gov programs. You give less of your money to charities than
conservatives, while proclaiming you're more compassionate than
conservatives.


that's true

conservatives believe in tax cuts for the rich and high taxes for the
middle class

ever compare middle class tax rates to capital gains taxes?



Liberals are two-faced, cheap lying *******s.


and conservatives steal everything then expect to be thanked for it


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com