![]() |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a
massive tax on the middle class which will hit union members particularly hard. The tax on so-called "Cadillac" health plans is opposed by organized labor, and could be a big reason why union rank-and-file members in Massachusetts vote for Scott Brown. http://workinprogress.firedoglake.co...-bad-bad-idea/ |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
C. Mor Butts wrote:
The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a Thanks for noticing, Tom. Now...go back into hibernation. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:15:21 -0500, C. Mor Butts
wrote: The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a massive tax on the middle class which will hit union members particularly hard. The tax on so-called "Cadillac" health plans is opposed by organized labor, and could be a big reason why union rank-and-file members in Massachusetts vote for Scott Brown. actually it excludes union members. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
C. Mor Butts wrote:
The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a massive tax on the middle class which will hit union members particularly hard. The tax on so-called "Cadillac" health plans is opposed by organized labor, and could be a big reason why union rank-and-file members in Massachusetts vote for Scott Brown. http://workinprogress.firedoglake.co...-bad-bad-idea/ It is all get eveninsm Union members are not the only ones with good reasonable health care plans. Premiums are paid for the extent of the coverage. Nobody gets a freebie. It is part of their pay or compensation. So the writers of this legislation want to cut their compensation by making them pay a sin tax because they have good health coverage. How many thousands in a pay cut/ tax will mollify the socialists?? If they can't make their mortgage payments because, of it will that satisfy them? They are not talking about five dollars a week. Their Constituents will get free health care and the ones with fair/good/excellent health care will pay a lot more or they can give up the Insurance and obtain lesser coverage and pay for it and pay a lot more for inferior coverage. Either way people with whatever they deem Cadillac Coverage will suffer. The ultra Rich or whatever they want to target won't be affected, in the least. Many most with formerly good coverage are having it taken away by the ultra Rich of Wall Street. They are gutting their American Employees compensation/health care to fill their Swiss bank accounts. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:15:21 -0500, C. Mor Butts wrote: The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a massive tax on the middle class which will hit union members particularly hard. The tax on so-called "Cadillac" health plans is opposed by organized labor, and could be a big reason why union rank-and-file members in Massachusetts vote for Scott Brown. actually it excludes union members. Why are union members excluded until 2017? Any rational reason except politics? |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:18:04 -0500, D.Duck wrote:
Why are union members excluded until 2017? Any rational reason except politics? The argument goes, unions bargained for improved health care coverage, instead of wage increases. Taxing their coverages would mean they would be paying an overall higher percentage than other working stiffs. Labor contracts generally run 5 years, meaning the present ones will have expired, by 2017. Then there is politics. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
thunder wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:18:04 -0500, D.Duck wrote: Why are union members excluded until 2017? Any rational reason except politics? The argument goes, unions bargained for improved health care coverage, instead of wage increases. Taxing their coverages would mean they would be paying an overall higher percentage than other working stiffs. Labor contracts generally run 5 years, meaning the present ones will have expired, by 2017. Then there is politics. Correct, Mr. T, and it also depends upon the employment sector. The scenario you describe most closely fits industrial and service sector employees, who indeed gave up significant pay raises in order to get better health care and sometimes pension benefits. In most of the construction unions, the $$$ negotiations are over the hourly rate, which the union members then decide how to divvy up between health care, pension, savings accounts and net paycheck. In the last six or eight years, the hourly rates have been pretty flat, but the amounts coming out of that hourly rate for health care have skyrocketed. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
lil abner wrote:
C. Mor Butts wrote: The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a massive tax on the middle class which will hit union members particularly hard. The tax on so-called "Cadillac" health plans is opposed by organized labor, and could be a big reason why union rank-and-file members in Massachusetts vote for Scott Brown. http://workinprogress.firedoglake.co...-bad-bad-idea/ It is all get eveninsm Union members are not the only ones with good reasonable health care plans. Premiums are paid for the extent of the coverage. Nobody gets a freebie. It is part of their pay or compensation. So the writers of this legislation want to cut their compensation by making them pay a sin tax because they have good health coverage. How many thousands in a pay cut/ tax will mollify the socialists?? If they can't make their mortgage payments because, of it will that satisfy them? They are not talking about five dollars a week. Their Constituents will get free health care and the ones with fair/good/excellent health care will pay a lot more or they can give up the Insurance and obtain lesser coverage and pay for it and pay a lot more for inferior coverage. Either way people with whatever they deem Cadillac Coverage will suffer. The ultra Rich or whatever they want to target won't be affected, in the least. Many most with formerly good coverage are having it taken away by the ultra Rich of Wall Street. They are gutting their American Employees compensation/health care to fill their Swiss bank accounts. That is how equality works under socialism. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
D.Duck wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:15:21 -0500, C. Mor Butts wrote: The Senate health care bill, which Martha Coakley supports, contains a massive tax on the middle class which will hit union members particularly hard. The tax on so-called "Cadillac" health plans is opposed by organized labor, and could be a big reason why union rank-and-file members in Massachusetts vote for Scott Brown. actually it excludes union members. Why are union members excluded until 2017? Any rational reason except politics? YKW doesn't want it going into effect on his watch. Apparently he is thinking on buying reelection. |
Dems Sucker Punch Mass Union Members
HK wrote:
thunder wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:18:04 -0500, D.Duck wrote: Why are union members excluded until 2017? Any rational reason except politics? The argument goes, unions bargained for improved health care coverage, instead of wage increases. Taxing their coverages would mean they would be paying an overall higher percentage than other working stiffs. Labor contracts generally run 5 years, meaning the present ones will have expired, by 2017. Then there is politics. Correct, Mr. T, and it also depends upon the employment sector. The scenario you describe most closely fits industrial and service sector employees, who indeed gave up significant pay raises in order to get better health care and sometimes pension benefits. In most of the construction unions, the $$$ negotiations are over the hourly rate, which the union members then decide how to divvy up between health care, pension, savings accounts and net paycheck. In the last six or eight years, the hourly rates have been pretty flat, but the amounts coming out of that hourly rate for health care have skyrocketed. Po babies. It ain't just the union lackies that have seen their lifestyles erode. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com