On 10/01/2010 6:55 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:34:18 -0500, lil abner wrote:


Political correctness is running amuck.

Is it? One of the problems with profiling, it makes people lazy, and
mistakes are made. Take this list the morons are passing around, looks
just dandy, doesn't it? Just one of the problems, Sirhan Sirhan wasn't a
Muslim. He was a Christian. Fortunately, this would be a problem of
inclusion, but lazy people also make mistakes of exclusion, allowing true
terrorists, that don't fit their simplistic profile, to do their damage.
Personally, I'd rather have my security dependent on professionals doing
their jobs, not dependent on lazy morons. But hey, make your own choice.

Sirhan Sirhan was Palestinian. Certainly would get caught in a good
profiling. Arabic/Middle east, young male from Palestinian. Question
is why did he get into the US even back then? Was he about 24 at the time?

He supports the case of closing US immigation and visas to the profile
if anything.

On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:43:13 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


Sirhan Sirhan was Palestinian. Certainly would get caught in a good
profiling. Arabic/Middle east, young male from Palestinian. Question
is why did he get into the US even back then? Was he about 24 at the
time?

Geeze, let's try a little simple math for the simpletons around here.
There are somewhere between one and a half to two billion Muslims on this
planet. How may of them do you think are young males? Maybe a couple of
hundred million? Some f'n profile.

Look, if you want to develop a true terrorist profile, fine. But if
anyone things that young male Muslims is an adequate profile, they are a
moron, and a racist.


He supports the case of closing US immigation and visas to the profile
if anything.

thunder wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:43:13 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


Sirhan Sirhan was Palestinian. Certainly would get caught in a good
profiling. Arabic/Middle east, young male from Palestinian. Question
is why did he get into the US even back then? Was he about 24 at the
time?

Geeze, let's try a little simple math for the simpletons around here.
There are somewhere between one and a half to two billion Muslims on this
planet. How may of them do you think are young males? Maybe a couple of
hundred million? Some f'n profile.

Look, if you want to develop a true terrorist profile, fine. But if
anyone things that young male Muslims is an adequate profile, they are a
moron, and a racist.


He supports the case of closing US immigation and visas to the profile
if anything.

Typical expected response from a pc liberal?
No one likes the idea too much but....
we are in a war, not by our declaration.
They intend, to keep on killing and terrorizing us, even if we withdraw
from the battle or defending ourselves
I don't give a damned what someone thinks when we are fighting for our
lives.
I'm sure there were a lot of nice Nazis...?
I am not ready, as some in Washington and Chicago etc seem to be, to
live under a new status quo of being treated as criminals or potential
criminals in order to safe guard us.
Do you like the idea of a police state, in order to be secure?
I understand they are going to prosecute a guy because he went beyond a
rope to wish his girl friend good bye.
This is nuts. He is charged because the Islamic Fanatics have succeeded
in making us jail our selves and subjecting us to Orwellian monitoring
and supervision.
Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

lil abner wrote:

Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

I'm sure you'll be among those enlisting to do this by going door to
door in Yemen and asking if there are any islamic terrorists inside.

Send us photos.

Harry wrote:
lil abner wrote:

Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

I'm sure you'll be among those enlisting to do this by going door to
door in Yemen and asking if there are any islamic terrorists inside.

Send us photos.
Uhhhhhhh......
I've no desire to be a process server.
Did they use that method in Dresden?

lil abner wrote:
Harry wrote:
lil abner wrote:

Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

I'm sure you'll be among those enlisting to do this by going door to
door in Yemen and asking if there are any islamic terrorists inside.

Send us photos.
Uhhhhhhh......
I've no desire to be a process server.
Did they use that method in Dresden?


You want to kill thousands of innocent Yemenis because their country has
been infected by 200 al qaeda right-wing religious conservative zealots?

On 10/01/2010 8:46 PM, Harry wrote:
lil abner wrote:

Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

I'm sure you'll be among those enlisting to do this by going door to
door in Yemen and asking if there are any islamic terrorists inside.

Send us photos.

Might not be a bad idea. I was thinking in Kanadar for example, why
they don't sweep the city door to door and as they run, shoot. If they
fail a lie detector, shoot. Sweep the city 4 or 5 times and bet the
terrorism subsides big time.

Which makes me wonder of our governmetns really want to win this or is
it about the politics of protecting Saudi Arabia from it's own war
mongering people at American/Canadians costs in lives and money.

And if you know there is a terrorist in a small building, take the whole
building out. Quite screwing around for some big mouthed muslim
dictator sponsored UN sociopath with an axe to grind. When they pay the
bills, we can listen, until then the freeloaders at the UN should shut up.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/01/2010 8:46 PM, Harry wrote:
lil abner wrote:

Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

I'm sure you'll be among those enlisting to do this by going door to
door in Yemen and asking if there are any islamic terrorists inside.

Send us photos.

Might not be a bad idea. I was thinking in Kanadar for example, why
they don't sweep the city door to door and as they run, shoot. If they
fail a lie detector, shoot. Sweep the city 4 or 5 times and bet the
terrorism subsides big time.

Which makes me wonder of our governmetns really want to win this or is
it about the politics of protecting Saudi Arabia from it's own war
mongering people at American/Canadians costs in lives and money.

And if you know there is a terrorist in a small building, take the whole
building out. Quite screwing around for some big mouthed muslim
dictator sponsored UN sociopath with an axe to grind. When they pay the
bills, we can listen, until then the freeloaders at the UN should shut up.


You really are quite the war-mongering conservative gasbag. If the world
were rid of morons like you, we'd be further along the path to planetary
peace.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 10/01/2010 8:46 PM, Harry wrote:
lil abner wrote:

Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.

I'm sure you'll be among those enlisting to do this by going door to
door in Yemen and asking if there are any islamic terrorists inside.

Send us photos.

Might not be a bad idea. I was thinking in Kanadar for example, why they
don't sweep the city door to door and as they run, shoot. If they fail a
lie detector, shoot. Sweep the city 4 or 5 times and bet the terrorism
subsides big time.

Which makes me wonder of our governmetns really want to win this or is it
about the politics of protecting Saudi Arabia from it's own war mongering
people at American/Canadians costs in lives and money.

And if you know there is a terrorist in a small building, take the whole
building out. Quite screwing around for some big mouthed muslim dictator
sponsored UN sociopath with an axe to grind. When they pay the bills, we
can listen, until then the freeloaders at the UN should shut up.


Speaking about freeloaders....I wonder if the US ever paid up it's dues
arrears at the UN?

"lil abner" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:43:13 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


Sirhan Sirhan was Palestinian. Certainly would get caught in a good
profiling. Arabic/Middle east, young male from Palestinian. Question
is why did he get into the US even back then? Was he about 24 at the
time?

Geeze, let's try a little simple math for the simpletons around here.
There are somewhere between one and a half to two billion Muslims on this
planet. How may of them do you think are young males? Maybe a couple of
hundred million? Some f'n profile. Look, if you want to develop a true
terrorist profile, fine. But if anyone things that young male Muslims is
an adequate profile, they are a moron, and a racist.
He supports the case of closing US immigation and visas to the profile
if anything.

Typical expected response from a pc liberal?
No one likes the idea too much but....
we are in a war, not by our declaration.
They intend, to keep on killing and terrorizing us, even if we withdraw
from the battle or defending ourselves
I don't give a damned what someone thinks when we are fighting for our
lives.
I'm sure there were a lot of nice Nazis...?
I am not ready, as some in Washington and Chicago etc seem to be, to live
under a new status quo of being treated as criminals or potential
criminals in order to safe guard us.
Do you like the idea of a police state, in order to be secure?
I understand they are going to prosecute a guy because he went beyond a
rope to wish his girl friend good bye.
This is nuts. He is charged because the Islamic Fanatics have succeeded in
making us jail our selves and subjecting us to Orwellian monitoring and
supervision.
Find and destroy every one that is or supports and teaches terrorism
against Americans.
If it takes half our GNP then do it. It is necessary.


Ah, the Cheney 1% solution... plus, subvert our Constitution. Great idea.

--
Nom=de=Plume