On Jan 11, 2:59*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message

....
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

....
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.

I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to Mike's
post (ummm... *oh never mind).

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my
reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to
"give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either.

No harm done.

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.

I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to
Mike's
post (ummm... oh never mind).

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my
reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to
"give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either.

No harm done.


Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike
sh*t. So, I apologize if I confused you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:11 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Dont blame him, he miss-read it while on the treadmill.....- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't have a treadmill.


I bought a Stairmaster fairly recently... for those days I'm just not
willing to run.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:
Looks like rec.boats is finished.
Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks
Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.
What post?
--
Nom=de=Plume
Maybe, the one you just answered to?
I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.


Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

Tim's not into this game. He doesn't need assholes like you provoking
him. Pick on someone else, or better yet get the hell out of here and go
play with your barbie dolls. I needed that. It calmed me right down.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:
Looks like rec.boats is finished.
Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks
Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.
What post?
--
Nom=de=Plume
Maybe, the one you just answered to?
I was giving you sh*t.
--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.
Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.
--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.
I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to
Mike's
post (ummm... oh never mind).

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my
reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to
"give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either.

No harm done.


Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike
sh*t. So, I apologize if I confused you.

Better if you took your "****" somewhere else.

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 2:11 pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Dont blame him, he miss-read it while on the treadmill.....- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't have a treadmill.


I bought a Stairmaster fairly recently... for those days I'm just not
willing to run.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Jumped on my PaceMaster treadmill this morning. Too cold to venture any
distance on foot.

"Harry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:
Looks like rec.boats is finished.
Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks
Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.
What post?
--
Nom=de=Plume
Maybe, the one you just answered to?
I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.


Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

Tim's not into this game. He doesn't need assholes like you provoking him.
Pick on someone else, or better yet get the hell out of here and go play
with your barbie dolls. I needed that. It calmed me right down.


Better yet, why don't you go play with your dildos Kevin/Ditzy/FlatulentJim.
Try us again in the spring.

On Jan 11, 4:53*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Tim" wrote in message

....
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

....
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.

I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to
Mike's
post (ummm... oh never mind).

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my
reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to
"give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either.

No harm done.

Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike
sh*t. So, I apologize if I confused you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part

Please refer to post # 14

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...3d1?scoring=d&

If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and isn't satisfactory
to you , then please believe what you wish.

I'm done with the thread.

?;^ )

Don White wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:
Looks like rec.boats is finished.
Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks
Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.
What post?
--
Nom=de=Plume
Maybe, the one you just answered to?
I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

Tim's not into this game. He doesn't need assholes like you provoking him.
Pick on someone else, or better yet get the hell out of here and go play
with your barbie dolls. I needed that. It calmed me right down.


Better yet, why don't you go play with your dildos Kevin/Ditzy/FlatulentJim.
Try us again in the spring.



Let you in on a secret little buddy. It wasn't any of those clowns.

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 11, 4:53 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote:

Looks like rec.boats is finished.

Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push
and
shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity
if
true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the
years.............and tried to ignore the rest.
Thanks

Mike
agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it.

What post?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe, the one you just answered to?

I was giving you sh*t.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is,
because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i
don't participate in it.

Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you
shouldn't read usenet postings.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who
isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill
feelings and resentments.

I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to
Mike's
post (ummm... oh never mind).

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my
reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to
"give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either.

No harm done.

Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving
Mike
sh*t. So, I apologize if I confused you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part

Please refer to post # 14

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...3d1?scoring=d&

If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and isn't satisfactory
to you , then please believe what you wish.

I'm done with the thread.

?;^ )


Reply: Wow... you can't even take an apology.... sheesh.


--
Nom=de=Plume