|
I Approve of This
*e#c wrote:
On Jan 9, 2:28 pm, John H wrote: On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to show 'signs' in about 4 seconds? I knew I had you filtered for a reason. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson "Filtered", and still reading her posts...what a liar. Herring is a lying asshole...always has been, always will be. And that's one of his more admirable attributes. |
I Approve of This
"Don White" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister! And, I'm not a maritime attorney even... -- Nom=de=Plume |
I Approve of This
"John H" wrote in message
... On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to show 'signs' in about 4 seconds? I knew I had you filtered for a reason. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around the Japanese fleet for weeks/months. Please, please filter me! You're just too odd. -- Nom=de=Plume |
I Approve of This
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:02:36 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to show 'signs' in about 4 seconds? I knew I had you filtered for a reason. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around the Japanese fleet for weeks/months. Please, please filter me! You're just too odd. Four seconds was about the reaction time the whaler had when the little boat turned into his path. Dense? I guess so. Bye. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson |
I Approve of This
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:30:43 -0800 (PST), "*e#c"
wrote: On Jan 9, 2:28*pm, John H wrote: On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to show 'signs' in about 4 seconds? I knew I had you filtered for a reason. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson "Filtered", and still reading her posts...what a liar. I unfiltered her when we were discussing the greening of my electric bill. She'd rather invest in an Al Gore scheme. Why don't you go spoof someone. You let us know you're true self when you do so, just like Harry does. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson |
I Approve of This
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister! She's your sister? That explains why she is so smartless. |
I Approve of This
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister! And, I'm not a maritime attorney even... You aren't even a boater. |
I Approve of This
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to show 'signs' in about 4 seconds? I knew I had you filtered for a reason. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around the Japanese fleet for weeks/months. Please, please filter me! You're just too odd. Now you are crossing boundaries. We don't filter you just because you are flat chested, do we? |
I Approve of This
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." -- Nom=de=Plume ~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister! And, I'm not a maritime attorney even... yeah, but you are one sexy moma |
I Approve of This
"John H" wrote in message
... On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:02:36 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North wrote: Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you. JR Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because you were fishing. There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish, deplete the seas and whatever From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was rammed. Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry?? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats' fault? That's how I read the laws involved. -- Nom=de=Plume This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped: http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983 A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since the Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at fault. -- Nom=de=Plume What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge of maritime law is eclipsed only by... Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around. Can't think of anything. Pretty much sums up your "thinking." What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to show 'signs' in about 4 seconds? I knew I had you filtered for a reason. -- John H "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." Thomas Jefferson Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around the Japanese fleet for weeks/months. Please, please filter me! You're just too odd. Four seconds was about the reaction time the whaler had when the little boat turned into his path. Dense? I guess so. BS.. they had weeks to figure out how to avoid the other boats. Dense, you betcha you are. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com