Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us?

John H wrote:
Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us?

This is a serious question: are you really so stupid that you don't know
the answer?

John H wrote:
Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us? I don't understand our legal
system, so that is why I am asking.

On Jan 7, 1:05*pm, John H wrote:
Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us?

I'll help. Were you also against it when they were going to be tried
in a military court?

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:26:59 -0500, John H
wrote:

Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)

Must really be needing attention, huh Harry?

On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:46:42 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jan 7, 1:05*pm, John H wrote:
Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us?

I'll help. Were you also against it when they were going to be tried
in a military court?

They shouldn't have been tried at all. They were prisoners of war.
They get let loose when the war's over.

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:05:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us?

you do realize it's obama who's president, right? and he's authorizing
the attacks, right?

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:26:59 -0500, John H
wrote:

John H wrote:
Please explain why it's OK to kill suspected Taliban or al Qaeda while
they're running around on the ground, but we have to have a judge and
jury for one who is trying hard as hell to actually kill us.

http://tinyurl.com/yzujz4x

Don't the Taliban or al Qaeda in Afghanistan or Yemen deserve the same
rights as those caught trying to kill us? I don't understand our legal
system, so that is why I am asking.

tell you what...you go find the constitution of the US in yemen,
m'kay?