| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
The sad thing is...
I could honestly see our President and head of Homeland Security
saying something like this. ------- In the wake of the attempted Christmas Day bombing of Northwest Airlines flight 253, President Obama, in a news conference from the Pacific White House in Hawaii, on Monday cautioned Americans to avoid "lashing out against folks in puffy underpants." Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, the son of a wealthy Nigerian banker, faces charges of attempting to destroy an airliner by detonating a high explosive sewn into what the FBI described as "boxers or briefs .... but clearly not adult incontinence undergarments." "Our future as a nation depends on how we react to this incident," the president said. "If we start profiling people based on the mere appearance of their slacks, a lot of incontinent adults as well as infants and toddlers will be swept up in the discriminatory backlash. Civil rights and social justice must take precedence over our parochial concerns about fire, explosions, crashes and the potential of physical harm resulting from such events." Standing side by side with the chairman of the Council of Adult Incontinence Relations, Obama noted that some of his own relatives had worn absorbent underwear, and "none of them ever attempted to down a jet." "We cannot let this isolated incident spark hate against a people who, by and large, want nothing more than to be left alone," the president said. "The greatest threat we face is a failure of tolerance. We will not allow a few bad apples change who we are as Americans." Meanwhile, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced new security measures for airports, including a requirement that passengers "dispense with belts, allowing their trousers to sag in a manner that would reveal any potential undergarment threat." "Sagging is still quite fashionable among America's youth," Napolitano said, "and so we believe that these new measures will not cause significant inconvenience to the traveling public. Every airline passenger will submit to this security protocol to prevent it from being discriminatory against any minority group." ----- From Scott Ott - ScrappleFace.com |
The sad thing is...
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. |
The sad thing is...
"John H" wrote in message ... On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. The intelligence people don't work for Obama, and have told him so. They answer to no one. Steve |
The sad thing is...
On Jan 4, 11:33*am, John H wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Are you REALLY saying that it's Obama's fault??!!!! That's the stupidist most unhinged thing you've come up with about the current administration YET! On SO many levels. |
The sad thing is...
Gene wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? The worst terrorist attack in US history occurred on the watch of George W. Bush and Dicque Cheney, a fact which makes Cheney's remarks on terrorism these days nothing more than laughable. |
The sad thing is...
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:57:12 -0500, Harry wrote:
The worst terrorist attack in US history occurred on the watch of George W. Bush and Dicque Cheney, a fact which makes Cheney's remarks on terrorism these days nothing more than laughable. Hey, Cheney is so out of the mainstream, I hope he keeps it up. Every time he opens his mouth, it's worth a couple more votes for Obama. |
The sad thing is...
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's. |
The sad thing is...
|
The sad thing is...
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:54:48 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Bill Clinton's. GMTA |
The sad thing is...
|
The sad thing is...
|
of
John H wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:54:48 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Bill Clinton's. GMTA Between the two of you, you might come up with a combined IQ of normal. |
The sad thing is...
|
The sad thing is...
|
The sad thing is...
|
The sad thing is...
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:50:37 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:00:45 -0500, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's. So, using that logic.... this must be Bush's..... Obama mentions how everything is the previous administrations fault at every oppourtunity. Only those things Obama has screwed up. Anything that's going well is not Bush's fault. |
The sad thing is...
|
The sad thing is...
On Jan 4, 8:27*pm, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:00:45 -0500, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's. So, using that logic.... this must be Bush's..... -- It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance. *-Thomas Sowell Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage *http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gene, as you know, it has NOTHING to do with logic. If it's bad, it's Obama's or Clinton's fault. Bush has done no wrong and never will. |
The sad thing is...
On Jan 4, 6:00*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? |
The sad thing is...
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? You've done NOTHING here but spread political bull****, lies, and distortions for months. Shame on you. |
The sad thing is...
On Jan 6, 8:50*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? *You've done NOTHING here but spread political bull****, lies, and distortions for months. Shame on you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Show me one. |
The sad thing is...
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:30:42 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote: On Jan 6, 8:50*am, John H wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? *You've done NOTHING here but spread political bull****, lies, and distortions for months. Shame on you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Show me one. One political post coming right up: "So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying?" |
The sad thing is...
On Jan 6, 9:36*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:30:42 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 8:50*am, John H wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? *You've done NOTHING here but spread political bull****, lies, and distortions for months. Shame on you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Show me one. One political post coming right up: "So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying?"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And show me where that is "bull****, lies, and distortions"? I simply asked a question. Bull****, lie, and distortions would be like your Pontiac and Saturns 50% off bull****. |
The sad thing is...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:27 pm, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:00:45 -0500, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's. So, using that logic.... this must be Bush's..... -- It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance. -Thomas Sowell Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gene, as you know, it has NOTHING to do with logic. If it's bad, it's Obama's or Clinton's fault. Bush has done no wrong and never will. Has anybody ever said, other than you, that "Bush has done no wrong and never will"? |
The sad thing is...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. |
The sad thing is...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:36 am, John H wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:30:42 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 8:50 am, John H wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? You've done NOTHING here but spread political bull****, lies, and distortions for months. Shame on you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Show me one. One political post coming right up: "So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying?"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And show me where that is "bull****, lies, and distortions"? I simply asked a question. Bull****, lie, and distortions would be like your Pontiac and Saturns 50% off bull****. Do you ever get the feeling you're being played like a violin? |
The sad thing is...
In article ,
says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 8:27 pm, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:00:45 -0500, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's. So, using that logic.... this must be Bush's..... -- It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance. -Thomas Sowell Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gene, as you know, it has NOTHING to do with logic. If it's bad, it's Obama's or Clinton's fault. Bush has done no wrong and never will. Has anybody ever said, other than you, that "Bush has done no wrong and never will"? Don't have to use the exact words you know? |
The sad thing is...
In article ,
says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? |
The sad thing is...
NotNow wrote:
In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? |
The sad thing is...
On Jan 6, 12:52*pm, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Who said I was directly quoting anybody? Here, I'll make it simple for you. Gene asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" To which John Herring answered: "Clinton." Now what in HELL would you think that meant??? |
The sad thing is...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:52 pm, Jim wrote: NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Who said I was directly quoting anybody? Here, I'll make it simple for you. Gene asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" To which John Herring answered: "Clinton." Now what in HELL would you think that meant??? I think John was jerking you around. |
The sad thing is...
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:26:07 -0500, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 12:52 pm, Jim wrote: NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Who said I was directly quoting anybody? Here, I'll make it simple for you. Gene asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" To which John Herring answered: "Clinton." Now what in HELL would you think that meant??? I think John was jerking you around. Sssshhhh! |
The sad thing is...
In article ,
says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... |
The sad thing is...
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:46:30 -0500, NotNow wrote:
In article , says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... You *still* don't know the answer? Damn, Loogy, that doesn't sound good. |
The sad thing is...
NotNow wrote:
In article , says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the most honest person on the planet you know. One trait you and Harry share is in processing the input you receive, you massage it so that you perceive it to be something you can argue with. Let's face it. All you two want to do here is stir the pot and win arguments. Simple as that. Oh, and you are playing straight man to a lot of chain pulling. |
The sad thing is...
Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote: In article , says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the most honest person on the planet you know. One trait you and Harry share is in processing the input you receive, you massage it so that you perceive it to be something you can argue with. Let's face it. All you two want to do here is stir the pot and win arguments. Simple as that. Oh, and you are playing straight man to a lot of chain pulling. Is that violin music? |
The sad thing is...
D.Duck wrote:
Jim wrote: NotNow wrote: In article , says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the most honest person on the planet you know. One trait you and Harry share is in processing the input you receive, you massage it so that you perceive it to be something you can argue with. Let's face it. All you two want to do here is stir the pot and win arguments. Simple as that. Oh, and you are playing straight man to a lot of chain pulling. Is that violin music? Si |
The sad thing is...
On Jan 7, 9:32*am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote: In article , says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the most honest person on the planet you know. If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew. |
The sad thing is...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote: NotNow wrote: In article , says... NotNow wrote: In article , says... Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet again.... Obama's intelligence communty? No. Can't happen. Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil? Clinton's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing about it?? Is that what you are implying? I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit similar to Harry's. So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of Clinton? Who are you quoting? John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked: "Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001 that we were actually attacked on our own soil?" And John Herring replied: "Clinton" I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to John) and Bush didn't? To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some odd reason..... Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the most honest person on the planet you know. If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew. If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com