The sad thing is...
 

On Jan 7, 11:06*am, Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.

If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.

If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jim, you'd have to ask your buddy Herring. He's the one who said
Clinton knew!

The sad thing is...
 

Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the
ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in
2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a
thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing,
how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush
knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.

If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.
If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?


Sometime I'm Jim but when I don't want to be considered stupid, I try to
post as harry.

The sad thing is...
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 am, Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.
If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.
If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jim, you'd have to ask your buddy Herring. He's the one who said
Clinton knew!

I want you to get to the bottom of this. Find out who knew what when and
what they did about it and get back to us with the data. Don't rely on
Herring as your sole source of information. What if he was wrong?
Looking forward to hearing from you real soon. ;-)

The sad thing is...
 

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:53:39 -0500, Jim wrote:

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 am, Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.
If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.
If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jim, you'd have to ask your buddy Herring. He's the one who said
Clinton knew!

I want you to get to the bottom of this. Find out who knew what when and
what they did about it and get back to us with the data. Don't rely on
Herring as your sole source of information. What if he was wrong?
Looking forward to hearing from you real soon. ;-)

Who's calling me wrong?

The sad thing is...
 

On Jan 7, 11:53*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 am, Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.
If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.
If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jim, you'd have to ask your buddy Herring. He's the one who said
Clinton knew!

I want you to get to the bottom of this. Find out who knew what when and
what they did about it and get back to us with the data. Don't rely on
Herring as your sole source of information. What if he was wrong?
Looking forward to hearing from you real soon. ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ask Herring, HE'S the one who said Clinton knew.

The sad thing is...
 

John H wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:53:39 -0500, Jim wrote:

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 am, Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.
If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.
If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Jim, you'd have to ask your buddy Herring. He's the one who said
Clinton knew!
I want you to get to the bottom of this. Find out who knew what when and
what they did about it and get back to us with the data. Don't rely on
Herring as your sole source of information. What if he was wrong?
Looking forward to hearing from you real soon. ;-)

Who's calling me wrong?

Just sayin. What if?

The sad thing is...
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:53 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 am, Harry wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:32 am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?
John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:
"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"
And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"
I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....
Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.
If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.
If everybody knew, why couldn't the plot be stopped?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Jim, you'd have to ask your buddy Herring. He's the one who said
Clinton knew!
I want you to get to the bottom of this. Find out who knew what when and
what they did about it and get back to us with the data. Don't rely on
Herring as your sole source of information. What if he was wrong?
Looking forward to hearing from you real soon. ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ask Herring, HE'S the one who said Clinton knew.
Can't answer the question. Huh Loogie.

The sad thing is...
 

In article 8d691be4-fa25-44ee-92e4-2929fc244bf8
@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 4, 8:27*pm, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:00:45 -0500, John H





wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....

Obama's intelligence communty?

No. Can't happen.

Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?

Clinton's.

So, using that logic.... this must be Bush's.....

--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
*-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Gene, as you know, it has NOTHING to do with logic. If it's bad, it's
Obama's or Clinton's fault. Bush has done no wrong and never will.

Pfffttt... Even when we do say something positive about Obama, or
negative about Bush, you are not honest enough to acknowledge it so what
does it matter at all what we say?

The sad thing is...
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jan 4, 6:00*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene





wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....

Obama's intelligence communty?

No. Can't happen.

Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?

Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?

You've done NOTHING here but spread political
bull****, lies, and distortions for months.

Shame on you.

Yeah, Obama himself can stand up 5 times a day and take campaign type
pot shots at Bush and the Republicans, but noooooobody can say anything
back to the anointed one... You are ridiculous, you should take up
Farkel or something...

The sad thing is...
 

In article 5702fe0c-4e34-424b-b13f-a9694a99c9e5
@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 6, 8:50*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:40:33 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene

wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....

Obama's intelligence communty?

No. Can't happen.

Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?

Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?

*You've done NOTHING here but spread political
bull****, lies, and distortions for months.

Shame on you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Show me one.

Every time you suggest that we only say Obama bad, Bush good. I have
stepped over that line several times, you have not... Either way, when
you say that about us, it is a lie... There, clear enough?