On Dec 23, 4:12*pm, Gene wrote:


...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....
But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

I'm still on the fence. I find it hard to beleive that, if it weren't
true, it would be all over CNN, MSNC, etc... but it's not. Not a
peep. They'd be dancing in the street to shoot down this lie, but no
dancing. It is hard to beleive, but...


...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

As I wrote, that ship has sailed. Nothing of a religious content is
allowed on any government property without it being protested and
lawsuit-filed out of existence. A better question is why are the
liberal anti-christian protestors being silent about religious-themed
decorations now? If it were Bush, they'd be rioting in the street.
Hell, he couldn't play a round of golf without 15 minutes of negative
new coverage. You know the answer... because it's BO... he's
special... he gets a pass for everything.

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?)
Yes it is!

and what do we get? Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Preposterous? No.
Unlikely? Not really.
Proven untrue? Surprisingly, not yet.
If true? Tasteless ****heads... whoever is responsible.