BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Another physicist not on the AGW payroll; (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/112447-another-physicist-not-agw-payroll%3B.html)

Frogwatch[_2_] December 22nd 09 07:34 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...ng/#more-14426
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.

nom=de=plume December 22nd 09 08:18 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...ng/#more-14426
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.



I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Frogwatch[_2_] December 22nd 09 09:57 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
On Dec 22, 3:18*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. *Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. *He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.

John H[_11_] December 22nd 09 10:02 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:57:34 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Dec 22, 3:18*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. *Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. *He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.


More smart Canadians.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

nom=de=plume December 22nd 09 10:07 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.



Bzzzt. Wrong answer.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume December 22nd 09 10:43 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.

I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.



Bzzzt. Wrong answer.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek

--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. Ruin what we have
left of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.


Ruin? By using an alternative to an environmentally destructive chemical?

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bill McKee December 22nd 09 11:07 PM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.



Bzzzt. Wrong answer.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek

--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. Ruin what we have left
of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.



Jack[_3_] December 23rd 09 02:12 AM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
On Dec 22, 6:07*pm, "Bill McKee" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message


....


YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma....
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.


--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.


Bzzzt. Wrong answer.


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek


--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. *Ruin what we have left
of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.


Tried to buy any R12 lately? You can't. It's all been virtually put
out of existence, at least here in the states.

Frogwatch December 23rd 09 02:40 AM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
On Dec 22, 5:43*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message

m...





"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
....
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message


....


YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess....
they're not created by humans.


--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.


Bzzzt. Wrong answer.


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek


--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. *Ruin what we have
left of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.


Vic Smith December 23rd 09 03:04 AM

Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;
 
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:40:11 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:



nom needs to learn some technology and chemistry. R12 and R22 were
the "bad" CFCs whereas the new CFCs do not cause ozone degradation.
We no longer use R12 and R22.


Most none-automobile HVAC, large and small, including industrial
chillers and kitchen fridges, still use R22.
It'll be 10 more years before R22 won't be produced.
http://www.epa.gov/Ozone/title6/phas...2phaseout.html

--Vic




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com