BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Calling all Global Warmist "scientists... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/112400-calling-all-global-warmist-scientists.html)

BAR[_2_] December 22nd 09 01:45 AM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
In article ,
says...
Who in hell is Dick Chaney, dummy?


Dick this, Chaney boy.

If you are going to highlight every misspelled word or sytex error I
make, you won't have time to cause your normal trouble.


It is spelled syntax.

My son and i donnut believe in education, it is a waste of time, and
real men don't spend time in school.


"i donnut" believe in education?

Mister spelling and syntax rises to the occasion, again.





Bill McKee December 22nd 09 03:25 AM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Geoduck" wrote in message
m...
On 12/20/09 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:49 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW.
I'm the
"creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly
complex
nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a
corporate
schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I have
"peer
reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's
thesis in my
life). Yada, yada, yada.

Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and the
other AGW
types to defend this.

http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=62e1c98...

Remember - this is your side - this is how you are presenting
your
information. This describes what happens when one of the most
widely
used sources of information is controlled and massaged and
only one
side of the "science" is presented.

Go ahead - defend this.

I'll wait.

Okay. Just because SOME (a very small percentage) tried to cook
some
books does in no way shape nor form prove whether or not global
warming is or isn't occuring.

And why we need 100% rational hard real scientists to look at
the issue
without the policitical money grabing schemes. Currently it is
about
money, money greed. Carbon tax, carbon credits and extortion.
That
isn't science, that is political greed and nanny state BS.

Even if it is warming, is that so bad? Equatorial zones have
evaporation to keep temperatures moderate, but the polar areas
would get
most of the warming. Is that so bad you can golf or go boating
in
norther US or Canada in January?

Hell, that is green, as more green further north would not hurt
mankind.
Be it golf green or green in your pocket. My utility bill would
even
become more moderate and less carbon to heat my home at -35C.

Eco nuts are "sky is falling" nut balls following the government
love in
for excuses for more taxes. Someone wise once said to me,
always follow
the money for your answers. Well the green thing is fostered by
government greed for taxation, be it carbon taxes or carbon
credits it
is about taking our money for them to waste on
GM/Bank/Government like
ponzi schemes. In the mean time, more green lawns and forrests
will
absorb more carbon. Nature has a unique way of balancing the
Earth and
eco freeks just don't want to admit that hard fact of reality.


Good grief... well, you've pretty much summed up the loonieness
of the
deniers. Good for you!


--
Nom=de=Plume


You just accentuated the loonieness of the gullible.



Yeah, I guess when someone talks science, it seems like magic to
you...



It's sorta interesting that we have several right-wingers in here
who *claim* to be scientists, but apparently have no ability to
apply the thought processes they learned in other fields to the ones
usually discussed here. I wouldn't call McKee a scientist of any
sort, though...his last work experience was rounding up illegals at
shape-ups to work on home improvement projects.

Actually the only times I have rounded up day laborers at the
gathering spots, was because the request for workers to the EDD never
supplied workers. And as a degreed engineer with patent and
designing high tech and biomed stuff, I would qualify as a scientist
a hell of a lot more than a person who sells used clothes and or is a
clam.


Whooo... try again to put me down if it makes you feel better. Why
don't you tell us about your "patent" that's either pending or
completed.

--
Nom=de=Plume


You are a claimed Patent attorney. Do a search.

Ok... look, just to be clear, I don't know if your real name is William
McKee. And, the fact that I did a search and found two patents under
that name in NO WAY could possibly confirm that I am or am not a patent
attorney. Anyone, perhaps even you, can do the search, which is what I
said previously.

Here you go...

http://tinyurl.com/yzwldr2

I'm going to sleep...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Try again. Wrong patents.



Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win.
Happy now?


--
Nom=de=Plume


Was never unhappy. You suck at patent searches. Guess you do not charge
for success.



nom=de=plume December 22nd 09 03:39 AM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Geoduck" wrote in message
m...
On 12/20/09 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:49 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW.
I'm the
"creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly
complex
nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a
corporate
schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I have
"peer
reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's
thesis in my
life). Yada, yada, yada.

Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and the
other AGW
types to defend this.

http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=62e1c98...

Remember - this is your side - this is how you are presenting
your
information. This describes what happens when one of the most
widely
used sources of information is controlled and massaged and
only one
side of the "science" is presented.

Go ahead - defend this.

I'll wait.

Okay. Just because SOME (a very small percentage) tried to
cook some
books does in no way shape nor form prove whether or not
global
warming is or isn't occuring.

And why we need 100% rational hard real scientists to look at
the issue
without the policitical money grabing schemes. Currently it is
about
money, money greed. Carbon tax, carbon credits and extortion.
That
isn't science, that is political greed and nanny state BS.

Even if it is warming, is that so bad? Equatorial zones have
evaporation to keep temperatures moderate, but the polar areas
would get
most of the warming. Is that so bad you can golf or go boating
in
norther US or Canada in January?

Hell, that is green, as more green further north would not hurt
mankind.
Be it golf green or green in your pocket. My utility bill
would even
become more moderate and less carbon to heat my home at -35C.

Eco nuts are "sky is falling" nut balls following the
government love in
for excuses for more taxes. Someone wise once said to me,
always follow
the money for your answers. Well the green thing is fostered
by
government greed for taxation, be it carbon taxes or carbon
credits it
is about taking our money for them to waste on
GM/Bank/Government like
ponzi schemes. In the mean time, more green lawns and forrests
will
absorb more carbon. Nature has a unique way of balancing the
Earth and
eco freeks just don't want to admit that hard fact of reality.


Good grief... well, you've pretty much summed up the loonieness
of the
deniers. Good for you!


--
Nom=de=Plume


You just accentuated the loonieness of the gullible.



Yeah, I guess when someone talks science, it seems like magic to
you...



It's sorta interesting that we have several right-wingers in here
who *claim* to be scientists, but apparently have no ability to
apply the thought processes they learned in other fields to the
ones usually discussed here. I wouldn't call McKee a scientist of
any sort, though...his last work experience was rounding up
illegals at shape-ups to work on home improvement projects.

Actually the only times I have rounded up day laborers at the
gathering spots, was because the request for workers to the EDD
never supplied workers. And as a degreed engineer with patent and
designing high tech and biomed stuff, I would qualify as a scientist
a hell of a lot more than a person who sells used clothes and or is
a clam.


Whooo... try again to put me down if it makes you feel better. Why
don't you tell us about your "patent" that's either pending or
completed.

--
Nom=de=Plume


You are a claimed Patent attorney. Do a search.

Ok... look, just to be clear, I don't know if your real name is William
McKee. And, the fact that I did a search and found two patents under
that name in NO WAY could possibly confirm that I am or am not a patent
attorney. Anyone, perhaps even you, can do the search, which is what I
said previously.

Here you go...

http://tinyurl.com/yzwldr2

I'm going to sleep...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Try again. Wrong patents.



Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win.
Happy now?


--
Nom=de=Plume


Was never unhappy. You suck at patent searches. Guess you do not charge
for success.


I think you're just a fool with too much time on your hands. Get a life and
if that happens, get back to us with the news.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Don White[_3_] December 22nd 09 04:10 AM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
Don White wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
I have offton wondered why you spend so much time talking about them? is
it becuase you emphesize with them?


** Jackass Alert **


Alert this, Jackass boy

Don White[_3_] December 22nd 09 04:10 AM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
Who in hell is Dick Chaney, dummy?

Dick this, Chaney boy.

If you are going to highlight every misspelled word or sytex error I
make, you won't have time to cause your normal trouble.


It is spelled syntax.

My son and i donnut believe in education, it is a waste of time, and
real men don't spend time in school.


"i donnut" believe in education?

Mister spelling and syntax rises to the occasion, again.




Spell this, sytex boy

Don White December 22nd 09 04:15 AM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...
Who in hell is Dick Chaney, dummy?


Dick this, Chaney boy.

If you are going to highlight every misspelled word or sytex error I
make, you won't have time to cause your normal trouble.


It is spelled syntax.

My son and i donnut believe in education, it is a waste of time, and
real men don't spend time in school.


"i donnut" believe in education?

Mister spelling and syntax rises to the occasion, again.


Hee hee! Maybe there is some 'good' in all this spoofing.
I'm getting a big laugh at the dummies who are being fooled. (as if that is
a big deal with the Dopey Army rejects)



Harry[_2_] December 22nd 09 01:01 PM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
nom=de=plume wrote:

Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win.
Happy now?


--
Nom=de=Plume

Was never unhappy. You suck at patent searches. Guess you do not charge
for success.


I think you're just a fool with too much time on your hands. Get a life and
if that happens, get back to us with the news.

You and I are just like two peas in a pod. When someone gets too close
to the truth, we let fly with insults.
We should hook up during my upcoming trip to the Bay area.
--

Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using
someone else's ID

NotEver[_2_] December 22nd 09 01:21 PM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
In article ,
says...

"Don White" wrote in message
...

I have offton wondered why you spend so much time talking about them? is
it becuase you emphesize with them?


** Jackass Alert **


**Jackass Alert**

NotEver[_2_] December 22nd 09 01:22 PM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
In article ,
says...

Don White wrote:

Oh my... looks like LooneyTunes is as dumb as The Freak.
Falling for the spoofers.. ~~ snerk ~~



An "Oh my" post! It must be the *real* dumb Donnie. Why do you think
people should have to decide which posts are from you and which are from
your "spoofer"? You did something to bring this on.

Rob


Yes he did, being an ass like his suck buddy Harry.

Don White December 22nd 09 01:24 PM

Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
 
In article ,
says...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:33:49 -0500, Rob wrote:

Don White wrote:

Oh my... looks like LooneyTunes is as dumb as The Freak.
Falling for the spoofers.. ~~ snerk ~~



An "Oh my" post! It must be the *real* dumb Donnie. Why do you think
people should have to decide which posts are from you and which are from
your "spoofer"? You did something to bring this on.

Rob


I don't get them direct, but do you notice a difference between the
'spoofer' and the 'spoofed'?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H


Facilitating again Johnny?


John this, Facility boy.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com