![]() |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
|
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "Geoduck" wrote in message m... On 12/20/09 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 20, 8:49 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW. I'm the "creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly complex nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a corporate schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I have "peer reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's thesis in my life). Yada, yada, yada. Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and the other AGW types to defend this. http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=62e1c98... Remember - this is your side - this is how you are presenting your information. This describes what happens when one of the most widely used sources of information is controlled and massaged and only one side of the "science" is presented. Go ahead - defend this. I'll wait. Okay. Just because SOME (a very small percentage) tried to cook some books does in no way shape nor form prove whether or not global warming is or isn't occuring. And why we need 100% rational hard real scientists to look at the issue without the policitical money grabing schemes. Currently it is about money, money greed. Carbon tax, carbon credits and extortion. That isn't science, that is political greed and nanny state BS. Even if it is warming, is that so bad? Equatorial zones have evaporation to keep temperatures moderate, but the polar areas would get most of the warming. Is that so bad you can golf or go boating in norther US or Canada in January? Hell, that is green, as more green further north would not hurt mankind. Be it golf green or green in your pocket. My utility bill would even become more moderate and less carbon to heat my home at -35C. Eco nuts are "sky is falling" nut balls following the government love in for excuses for more taxes. Someone wise once said to me, always follow the money for your answers. Well the green thing is fostered by government greed for taxation, be it carbon taxes or carbon credits it is about taking our money for them to waste on GM/Bank/Government like ponzi schemes. In the mean time, more green lawns and forrests will absorb more carbon. Nature has a unique way of balancing the Earth and eco freeks just don't want to admit that hard fact of reality. Good grief... well, you've pretty much summed up the loonieness of the deniers. Good for you! -- Nom=de=Plume You just accentuated the loonieness of the gullible. Yeah, I guess when someone talks science, it seems like magic to you... It's sorta interesting that we have several right-wingers in here who *claim* to be scientists, but apparently have no ability to apply the thought processes they learned in other fields to the ones usually discussed here. I wouldn't call McKee a scientist of any sort, though...his last work experience was rounding up illegals at shape-ups to work on home improvement projects. Actually the only times I have rounded up day laborers at the gathering spots, was because the request for workers to the EDD never supplied workers. And as a degreed engineer with patent and designing high tech and biomed stuff, I would qualify as a scientist a hell of a lot more than a person who sells used clothes and or is a clam. Whooo... try again to put me down if it makes you feel better. Why don't you tell us about your "patent" that's either pending or completed. -- Nom=de=Plume You are a claimed Patent attorney. Do a search. Ok... look, just to be clear, I don't know if your real name is William McKee. And, the fact that I did a search and found two patents under that name in NO WAY could possibly confirm that I am or am not a patent attorney. Anyone, perhaps even you, can do the search, which is what I said previously. Here you go... http://tinyurl.com/yzwldr2 I'm going to sleep... -- Nom=de=Plume Try again. Wrong patents. Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win. Happy now? -- Nom=de=Plume Was never unhappy. You suck at patent searches. Guess you do not charge for success. |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "Geoduck" wrote in message m... On 12/20/09 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 20, 8:49 am, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW. I'm the "creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly complex nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a corporate schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I have "peer reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's thesis in my life). Yada, yada, yada. Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and the other AGW types to defend this. http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=62e1c98... Remember - this is your side - this is how you are presenting your information. This describes what happens when one of the most widely used sources of information is controlled and massaged and only one side of the "science" is presented. Go ahead - defend this. I'll wait. Okay. Just because SOME (a very small percentage) tried to cook some books does in no way shape nor form prove whether or not global warming is or isn't occuring. And why we need 100% rational hard real scientists to look at the issue without the policitical money grabing schemes. Currently it is about money, money greed. Carbon tax, carbon credits and extortion. That isn't science, that is political greed and nanny state BS. Even if it is warming, is that so bad? Equatorial zones have evaporation to keep temperatures moderate, but the polar areas would get most of the warming. Is that so bad you can golf or go boating in norther US or Canada in January? Hell, that is green, as more green further north would not hurt mankind. Be it golf green or green in your pocket. My utility bill would even become more moderate and less carbon to heat my home at -35C. Eco nuts are "sky is falling" nut balls following the government love in for excuses for more taxes. Someone wise once said to me, always follow the money for your answers. Well the green thing is fostered by government greed for taxation, be it carbon taxes or carbon credits it is about taking our money for them to waste on GM/Bank/Government like ponzi schemes. In the mean time, more green lawns and forrests will absorb more carbon. Nature has a unique way of balancing the Earth and eco freeks just don't want to admit that hard fact of reality. Good grief... well, you've pretty much summed up the loonieness of the deniers. Good for you! -- Nom=de=Plume You just accentuated the loonieness of the gullible. Yeah, I guess when someone talks science, it seems like magic to you... It's sorta interesting that we have several right-wingers in here who *claim* to be scientists, but apparently have no ability to apply the thought processes they learned in other fields to the ones usually discussed here. I wouldn't call McKee a scientist of any sort, though...his last work experience was rounding up illegals at shape-ups to work on home improvement projects. Actually the only times I have rounded up day laborers at the gathering spots, was because the request for workers to the EDD never supplied workers. And as a degreed engineer with patent and designing high tech and biomed stuff, I would qualify as a scientist a hell of a lot more than a person who sells used clothes and or is a clam. Whooo... try again to put me down if it makes you feel better. Why don't you tell us about your "patent" that's either pending or completed. -- Nom=de=Plume You are a claimed Patent attorney. Do a search. Ok... look, just to be clear, I don't know if your real name is William McKee. And, the fact that I did a search and found two patents under that name in NO WAY could possibly confirm that I am or am not a patent attorney. Anyone, perhaps even you, can do the search, which is what I said previously. Here you go... http://tinyurl.com/yzwldr2 I'm going to sleep... -- Nom=de=Plume Try again. Wrong patents. Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win. Happy now? -- Nom=de=Plume Was never unhappy. You suck at patent searches. Guess you do not charge for success. I think you're just a fool with too much time on your hands. Get a life and if that happens, get back to us with the news. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
Don White wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... I have offton wondered why you spend so much time talking about them? is it becuase you emphesize with them? ** Jackass Alert ** Alert this, Jackass boy |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
BAR wrote:
In article , says... Who in hell is Dick Chaney, dummy? Dick this, Chaney boy. If you are going to highlight every misspelled word or sytex error I make, you won't have time to cause your normal trouble. It is spelled syntax. My son and i donnut believe in education, it is a waste of time, and real men don't spend time in school. "i donnut" believe in education? Mister spelling and syntax rises to the occasion, again. Spell this, sytex boy |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
"BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... Who in hell is Dick Chaney, dummy? Dick this, Chaney boy. If you are going to highlight every misspelled word or sytex error I make, you won't have time to cause your normal trouble. It is spelled syntax. My son and i donnut believe in education, it is a waste of time, and real men don't spend time in school. "i donnut" believe in education? Mister spelling and syntax rises to the occasion, again. Hee hee! Maybe there is some 'good' in all this spoofing. I'm getting a big laugh at the dummies who are being fooled. (as if that is a big deal with the Dopey Army rejects) |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
nom=de=plume wrote:
Well, since you won't give me your real name, then I give up. You win. Happy now? -- Nom=de=Plume Was never unhappy. You suck at patent searches. Guess you do not charge for success. I think you're just a fool with too much time on your hands. Get a life and if that happens, get back to us with the news. You and I are just like two peas in a pod. When someone gets too close to the truth, we let fly with insults. We should hook up during my upcoming trip to the Bay area. -- Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using someone else's ID |
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
|
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
|
Calling all Global Warmist "scientists...
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com