| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Our next president?
|
Our next president?
"Rob" wrote in message
... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
My local dog catcher will have a better chance than Obrother in 2012.
Count on it. Dale www.FishWisher.com |
Our next president?
"FishWisher" wrote in message
... My local dog catcher will have a better chance than Obrother in 2012. Count on it. Dale www.FishWisher.com I don't think I will. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Our next president?
|
Our next president?
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:57:02 -0800 (PST), FishWisher
wrote: My local dog catcher will have a better chance than Obrother in 2012. Count on it. Dale www.FishWisher.com Don't you have some 50 year old sturgeon to slaughter today? |
Our next president?
On Dec 16, 7:47*pm, Rob wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. Whole lotta nothin' right there. |
Our next president?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:53:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. With all respect John, Obama would tear him to pieces... The guy didn't say anything really. It's not necessary to be so respectful to Rob that you call him John. 'Rob' is probably good enough! -- Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
Our next president?
wrote in message
... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message om... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
wrote in message
... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message om... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:26:38 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews. com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"? You're playing a game with semantics. An idealogy is an idealogy simply because it is substantive. Otherwise everything you or anyone else in this forum spews out is nothing more than a Lewis Carroll musing. For your own sake, you need to learn to be 'wrong' on occassion. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Our next president?
wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:26:38 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews .com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"? You're playing a game with semantics. An idealogy is an idealogy simply because it is substantive. Otherwise everything you or anyone else in this forum spews out is nothing more than a Lewis Carroll musing. For your own sake, you need to learn to be 'wrong' on occassion. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access No. Substance is actually making a proposal. He didn't do that. You're the one playing semantics. Perhaps you should follow your own perscription and "be wrong" occasionally. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews .com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg., but can't see a better alternative, and I trust Obama has looked at it from every angle and picked the least worst action. I'm also not happy with his seeming lack of commitment wrt to healthcare. I don't know what to make of that. I agree though... Steward is amazing. Thank God for him. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. |
Our next president?
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg., but can't see a better alternative, and I trust Obama has looked at it from every angle and picked the least worst action. I'm also not happy with his seeming lack of commitment wrt to healthcare. I don't know what to make of that. I agree though... Steward is amazing. Thank God for him. He does have that Nobel Peace Prize to live up to. Rob |
Our next president?
"Rob" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg., but can't see a better alternative, and I trust Obama has looked at it from every angle and picked the least worst action. I'm also not happy with his seeming lack of commitment wrt to healthcare. I don't know what to make of that. I agree though... Steward is amazing. Thank God for him. He does have that Nobel Peace Prize to live up to. Rob You are such a bizarre guy. You seem to think it's all about personal putdowns, when 1000's are dying and millions are at risk. Some stand-up citizen... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
"Rob" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:59:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganew s.com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg. Wasn't Afg a brand of film? Seem to remember that. --Vic |
Our next president?
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:59:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@gigane ws.com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg. Wasn't Afg a brand of film? Seem to remember that. --Vic I think it is/was... Kodacrome, those nice bright colors... :) -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:01:19 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:59:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message om... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@gigan ews.com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg. Wasn't Afg a brand of film? Seem to remember that. --Vic I think it is/was... Kodacrome, those nice bright colors... :) That'd be Agfa. Maybe you're thinking of Alf, the Muppet. |
Our next president?
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:08:24 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:59:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@gigane ws.com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg. Wasn't Afg a brand of film? Seem to remember that. --Vic Afga, I think. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
Our next president?
On Dec 17, 12:45*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. |
Our next president?
"jps" wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:01:19 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:59:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message news:41vki55ivdn4lbtu29feonab3443eiudna@4ax. com... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giga news.com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg. Wasn't Afg a brand of film? Seem to remember that. --Vic I think it is/was... Kodacrome, those nice bright colors... :) That'd be Agfa. Maybe you're thinking of Alf, the Muppet. Agfa... that's it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg., but can't see a better alternative, and I trust Obama has looked at it from every angle and picked the least worst action. I'm also not happy with his seeming lack of commitment wrt to healthcare. I don't know what to make of that. I agree though... Steward is amazing. Thank God for him. He does have that Nobel Peace Prize to live up to. Rob You are such a bizarre guy. You seem to think it's all about personal putdowns, when 1000's are dying and millions are at risk. Some stand-up citizen... Obama is struggling to be just that. |
Our next president?
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. Amazing set up... The same could be said for Obama and his failures. |
Our next president?
"Rob" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. Huh? I suppose you could say "says things they don't mean" but they usually make the statement so ambiguous they have an out. Did you hear Jon Stewart the other night comparing Obama's war speech to Bush's? Basically "new boss, same as the old boss" Stewart is probably the closest thing we have to a fair and balanced news reporter these days and it is supposed to be a comedy show. I'm not happy with the escalation in Afg., but can't see a better alternative, and I trust Obama has looked at it from every angle and picked the least worst action. I'm also not happy with his seeming lack of commitment wrt to healthcare. I don't know what to make of that. I agree though... Steward is amazing. Thank God for him. He does have that Nobel Peace Prize to live up to. Rob You are such a bizarre guy. You seem to think it's all about personal putdowns, when 1000's are dying and millions are at risk. Some stand-up citizen... Obama is struggling to be just that. He's doing just fine as a citizen and as a president. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
"Rob" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. Amazing set up... The same could be said for Obama and his failures. Amazingly stupid response from you. He's ... umm... the president. He's accomplished more than someone who might or might not get elected to Congress just be being president. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
"Steve B" wrote in message
... "Rob" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. Amazing set up... The same could be said for Obama and his failures. I guess you haven't been keeping up. He's created millions of jobs. He's saved millions of homes from foreclosure. He's cut the national debt, and has a plan to have it down to zero by the time he leaves office. Everyone gets free health care, and by doing that, the debt will actually be reduced until it starts saving so much money, there will be a huge surplus that we can send to underdeveloped countries to assuage our guilt over being so successful. At least, that's what the nurse just told me when I woke up from a coma ............... Steve I guess you haven't caught up... the economy is getting better, Iraq is winding down, the job situation is improving. He's dealing with Gitmo. Basically, he's attempting to fix the screwups from the previous adm. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
"Rob" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. Amazing set up... The same could be said for Obama and his failures. I guess you haven't been keeping up. He's created millions of jobs. He's saved millions of homes from foreclosure. He's cut the national debt, and has a plan to have it down to zero by the time he leaves office. Everyone gets free health care, and by doing that, the debt will actually be reduced until it starts saving so much money, there will be a huge surplus that we can send to underdeveloped countries to assuage our guilt over being so successful. At least, that's what the nurse just told me when I woke up from a coma ................ Steve |
Our next president?
On Dec 18, 12:37*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. |
Our next president?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Dec 18, 11:11*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone. -- Nom=de=Plume Then, why didn't you say so? |
Our next president?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Dec 18, 11:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone. -- Nom=de=Plume Then, why didn't you say so? Say what? I said, "Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now." You then said, "The executive branch...." Would like to clarify what exactly you're trying to say? Perhaps start with something that's not quite so lame. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Dec 19, 12:14*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 11:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message .... On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone. -- Nom=de=Plume Then, why didn't you say so? Say what? I said, "Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now." You then said, "The executive branch...." Would like to clarify what exactly you're trying to say? Perhaps start with something that's not quite so lame. -- Nom=de=Plume And just whom all does your executive branch take in? OK, lets broaden it to your legislative branch as well. Mostly the Judicial branch is appointed so, that can't happen. I noticed you come down a bit hard on Bush and his VP. are they not the Exec branch as well? Now wouldn't you be one of the first to brand them liars. Absolutely you would. You have a phrase in the states concerning finding something very lost. "Like finding a needle in a hay-stack," If I recall. We have a similar phrase, like "trying to find an honest man in parliament..." Don't act so naive, D'Plume. I thought you were smarter than what you let on. But maybe not. Not so lame? Then tighten up your splint. |
Our next president?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Dec 19, 12:14 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 11:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone. -- Nom=de=Plume Then, why didn't you say so? Say what? I said, "Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now." You then said, "The executive branch...." Would like to clarify what exactly you're trying to say? Perhaps start with something that's not quite so lame. -- Nom=de=Plume And just whom all does your executive branch take in? OK, lets broaden it to your legislative branch as well. Mostly the Judicial branch is appointed so, that can't happen. I noticed you come down a bit hard on Bush and his VP. are they not the Exec branch as well? Now wouldn't you be one of the first to brand them liars. Absolutely you would. You have a phrase in the states concerning finding something very lost. "Like finding a needle in a hay-stack," If I recall. We have a similar phrase, like "trying to find an honest man in parliament..." Don't act so naive, D'Plume. I thought you were smarter than what you let on. But maybe not. Not so lame? Then tighten up your splint. Reply: Here's the definition of the executive branch, although I'm not sure what that has to do with either your or my original comment. I'm still waiting for a response that clarifies your claim. If it makes you feel better, tell me I'm just average. http://www.vietwebdisk.com/www.usa.g...xecutive.shtml If you like, you can view it in chart form he http://www.cogmap.com/chart/united-states-of-america -- Nom=de=Plume |
Our next president?
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:06:12 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote: On Dec 19, 12:14*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 11:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 12:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 12:45 pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? I think he's got jsut a good of a chance as anyone else. but he doesn't lie enough, probably. The better the liar, the better the politician. Why don't you think he doesn't lie enough? Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now. -- Nom=de=Plume You are correct. D'Plume. The executive branch of your government is overflowing with honesty, integrity, and ethical virtue with no regard to Kantian duty. Never said that. Perhaps you need to get a reading lesson from someone. -- Nom=de=Plume Then, why didn't you say so? Say what? I said, "Perhaps the better liar was a better politician in the past, but it doesn't cut it now." You then said, "The executive branch...." Would like to clarify what exactly you're trying to say? Perhaps start with something that's not quite so lame. -- Nom=de=Plume And just whom all does your executive branch take in? OK, lets broaden it to your legislative branch as well. Mostly the Judicial branch is appointed so, that can't happen. I noticed you come down a bit hard on Bush and his VP. are they not the Exec branch as well? Now wouldn't you be one of the first to brand them liars. Absolutely you would. You have a phrase in the states concerning finding something very lost. "Like finding a needle in a hay-stack," If I recall. We have a similar phrase, like "trying to find an honest man in parliament..." Don't act so naive, D'Plume. I thought you were smarter than what you let on. But maybe not. Not so lame? Then tighten up your splint. I'm beginning to think the plum just may be Loogy in disguise, and that you may be the Tosk in disguise. The parallels are just unreal. And funny as hell. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
Our next president?
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. Amazing set up... The same could be said for Obama and his failures. Amazingly stupid response from you. He's ... umm... the president. He's accomplished more than someone who might or might not get elected to Congress just be being president. Once again, you don't read very well. Read your post again (and replace "and" with "to" for proper English) and get back to me. Rob |
Our next president?
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. West is running for Congress now. Let him start there. When/if he gets elected, he can try to accomplish something. It would be nice to know what he actually is going to try and accomplish. Amazing set up... The same could be said for Obama and his failures. I guess you haven't been keeping up. He's created millions of jobs. He's saved millions of homes from foreclosure. He's cut the national debt, and has a plan to have it down to zero by the time he leaves office. Everyone gets free health care, and by doing that, the debt will actually be reduced until it starts saving so much money, there will be a huge surplus that we can send to underdeveloped countries to assuage our guilt over being so successful. At least, that's what the nurse just told me when I woke up from a coma ............... Steve I guess you haven't caught up... the economy is getting better, Iraq is winding down, the job situation is improving. He's dealing with Gitmo. Basically, he's attempting to fix the screwups from the previous adm. "He's dealing with Gitmo". Now *that's* funny! Closing Gitmo was his *first order* as the President. Almost a year later - NOTHING! This also had *zero* to do with the previous administration. Why he gave it an entire year is anyone's guess unless he realized there was no need for it. In this video he has to ask his staff for clarification on something not on the teleprompter. He has a few weeks left... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8NJQa0pXPM |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com