"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



It's reconcile, but who's counting?

Rob

On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it
in a proper dictionary.

"Harry" wrote in message
m...
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in
a proper dictionary.



That's me. Obscure.

On 12/17/09 8:54 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
m...
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in
a proper dictionary.



That's me. Obscure.




Better to be obscure than familiar.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

Actually, you can.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

The Byrd Rule (which is supposed to limit its use) is just a convention,
which has been ignored before.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:54:03 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:



"Harry" wrote in message
om...
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in
a proper dictionary.



That's me. Obscure.


Well, you have been. But the plum can use some folks to argue with
her.

Good to see you're back.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Dec 17, 8:55*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/17/09 8:54 PM, Eisboch wrote:





*wrote in message
om...
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
* wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume

My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. *You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. *There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in
a proper dictionary.

That's me. *Obscure.

Better to be obscure than familiar.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why don't YOU go be obscure instead of familiar then? Most of us here
would like that.

On Dec 17, 8:23*pm, Rob wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
*wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume

My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. *You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. *There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

It's reconcile, but who's counting?

Rob- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don the rec.boats keystone cop of typos and spelling, that's who!

On Dec 17, 5:33*pm, thunder wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:00 -0500, John H wrote:
If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

Garbage. *"If we’re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo.
It will break him." *Want to guess who said that? *It doesn't sound much
like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating
Obama.

Yes, indeed! That is all most of the republicans want. Hateful,
bigoted, intolerant.