"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012.



Why?


Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would be
Palin.

--
Nom=de=Plume


palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared
the VEEP. Biden. Talk about the Peter Principal.

Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Unfortunately we have what we got.

Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what we
could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to" isn't
saying much.

At least he has a functioning brain.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas.

Sort of like yours?

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 12/16/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, wrote:
Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012.



Why?


Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would be
Palin.

--
Nom=de=Plume


palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared
the VEEP. Biden. Talk about the Peter Principal.

Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Unfortunately we have what we got.

Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what we
could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to" isn't
saying much.

At least he has a functioning brain.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas.

Sort of like yours?



McKee is a reconstructed "dixiecrat" who didn't get the memo about
switching to the GOP.

On Dec 16, 3:59*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/16/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:



"Bill *wrote in message
...

*wrote in message
...
*wrote in message
news:NPKdnQVkm9G7F7XWnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@earthlink .com...

*wrote in message
...
"Bill *wrote in message
...

*wrote in message
...
*wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, *wrote:
Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012.

Why?

Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would be
Palin.

--
Nom=de=Plume

palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared
the VEEP. *Biden. *Talk about the Peter Principal.

Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Unfortunately we have what we got.

Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what we
could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to" isn't
saying much.

At least he has a functioning brain.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas.

Sort of like yours?

McKee is a reconstructed "dixiecrat" who didn't get the memo about
switching to the GOP.

herr Krause. What were you saying about democrats?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1261...Most_P opular

"Harry" wrote in message
...
On 12/16/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, wrote:
Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012.



Why?


Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would
be
Palin.

--
Nom=de=Plume


palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared
the VEEP. Biden. Talk about the Peter Principal.

Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Unfortunately we have what we got.

Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what
we
could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to" isn't
saying much.

At least he has a functioning brain.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas.

Sort of like yours?



McKee is a reconstructed "dixiecrat" who didn't get the memo about
switching to the GOP.



I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the Democrats
suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and
screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care bill?

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"Harry" wrote in message
...
On 12/16/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, wrote:
Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012.



Why?


Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would
be
Palin.

--
Nom=de=Plume


palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared
the VEEP. Biden. Talk about the Peter Principal.

Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Unfortunately we have what we got.

Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what
we
could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to"
isn't
saying much.

At least he has a functioning brain.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas.

Sort of like yours?



McKee is a reconstructed "dixiecrat" who didn't get the memo about
switching to the GOP.



I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the
Democrats suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in
control and screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the
health care bill?

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



It's reconcile, but who's counting?

Rob

On Dec 17, 8:23*pm, Rob wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
*wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume

My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. *You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. *There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

It's reconcile, but who's counting?

Rob- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don the rec.boats keystone cop of typos and spelling, that's who!

On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it
in a proper dictionary.

"Harry" wrote in message
m...
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume


My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch



"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in
a proper dictionary.



That's me. Obscure.