In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:28:30 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Dec 12, 5:16*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:45:20 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog

wrote:
The Rolling Stone magazine for decades as been far left of centre, and
it seems that they are less than enamored by what your saviour is
doing and where it shall lead.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...as_big_sellout

so the right wing is wrong an obama's not a leftie?

those of us who are liberal knew it all the time

I believe what they are beginning to realise is that the US voter has
been sold the proverbial "bill of goods" and thusly, have elected a
proverbial "pig in a poke."

And Bush was the one blamed for being a fascist.

well he was a fascist. and obama's a moderate. that's what's surprised
the left...and the right.

just go to the 'national review' website and read the reaction to his
nobel speech...surprisingly approving


That's cause it was a good speech. Don't tell Loogie I said this, oh
wait, it wouldn't matter anywa........

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:45:45 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:28:30 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Dec 12, 5:16*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:45:20 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog

wrote:
The Rolling Stone magazine for decades as been far left of centre, and
it seems that they are less than enamored by what your saviour is
doing and where it shall lead.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...as_big_sellout

so the right wing is wrong an obama's not a leftie?

those of us who are liberal knew it all the time

I believe what they are beginning to realise is that the US voter has
been sold the proverbial "bill of goods" and thusly, have elected a
proverbial "pig in a poke."

And Bush was the one blamed for being a fascist.

well he was a fascist. and obama's a moderate. that's what's surprised
the left...and the right.

just go to the 'national review' website and read the reaction to his
nobel speech...surprisingly approving


That's cause it was a good speech. Don't tell Loogie I said this, oh
wait, it wouldn't matter anywa........

Actually, I was impressed with that speech. He sounded just like
George Bush, trying to explain that war is sometimes necessary.

With his actions in Afghanistan paralleling those of Bush in Iraq,
Obama may accomplish something yet.

Oh wait, 'surges' don't work, do they?
--

John H

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:02:04 -0500, John H
wrote:



And Bush was the one blamed for being a fascist.

well he was a fascist. and obama's a moderate. that's what's surprised
the left...and the right.

just go to the 'national review' website and read the reaction to his
nobel speech...surprisingly approving


That's cause it was a good speech. Don't tell Loogie I said this, oh
wait, it wouldn't matter anywa........

Actually, I was impressed with that speech. He sounded just like
George Bush, trying to explain that war is sometimes necessary.

With his actions in Afghanistan paralleling those of Bush in Iraq,
Obama may accomplish something yet.

Oh wait, 'surges' don't work, do they?


too bad bush didn't think of a surge in afghanistan, instead of merely
lying about iraq, huh?

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:45:20 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

The Rolling Stone magazine for decades as been far left of centre, and
it seems that they are less than enamored by what your saviour is
doing and where it shall lead.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...as_big_sellout


so the right wing is wrong an obama's not a leftie?

those of us who are liberal knew it all the time

A lot of us knew what he was before the election. I never could
understand why nobody commented about that "tick" he has when he is
lying or doesn't believe what he is saying. I used to see it down south
when he kind of goes "airy" and lazily doesn't finish the last few words
of a sentence... But I am just a dumb rightie


you said it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article eb60f6fe-0a02-430e-bd3c-
, says...

The Rolling Stone magazine for decades as been far left of centre, and
it seems that they are less than enamored by what your saviour is
doing and where it shall lead.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...as_big_sellout

Wow, that is a very interesting article. Wonder if the White House will
go after Rolling Stone now? That article is a killer for the left.


Yeah... everyone around the world reads RS. It's like the Economist, only
better.

--
Nom=de=Plume