On Dec 12, 11:49*am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

It won't be. *First, it's not in the House bill. *Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.
Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.

On Dec 12, 1:44*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. *First, it's not in the House bill. *Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.

The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.

The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg


Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Dec 14, 12:08*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:



Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.
The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg

Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Contrary. It says the van owner is questioning the health care bill
that Obama is pushing. But your response says that you aren't very
bright.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 12:08 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:



Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there
when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.
The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg

Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Contrary. It says the van owner is questioning the health care bill
that Obama is pushing. But your response says that you aren't very
bright.


On the contrary, if he was, he and you might want to consider the actual
facts instead of having an actual discussion.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:28:02 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Dec 14, 12:08*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:



Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.
The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg

Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Contrary. It says the van owner is questioning the health care bill
that Obama is pushing. But your response says that you aren't very
bright.

Saying, "...you are not to bright" is not too bright.
--

John H

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:28:02 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Dec 14, 12:08 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:



Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there
when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into
the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.
The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg

Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Contrary. It says the van owner is questioning the health care bill
that Obama is pushing. But your response says that you aren't very
bright.

Saying, "...you are not to bright" is not too bright.
--

John H


Why's that John? Are you unable to face reality?


--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, wrote:

Loogypicker wrote:

On Dec 12, 11:49 am, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:

Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.


The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg


Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.


"to bright"? Donnie? Did you get that one or did WAFA tell you she's
off-limits?

It's "deliciously" ironic, however!

In article 97a78ab6-86f4-4c93-ac72-7ccd5a117cd5
@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 12, 11:49*am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

It won't be. *First, it's not in the House bill. *Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Jesus Harry, I thought you were on vacation...