Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() South Carolina has been getting all the attention. So NC is doing some of their own backwards **** to make sure they're not out of the running in the battle to be the dummest southern state. South Carolina has a huge lead... ASHEVILLE North Carolina's constitution is clear: politicians who deny the existence of God are barred from holding office. Opponents of Cecil Bothwell are seizing on that law to argue he should not be seated as a City Council member today, even though federal courts have ruled religious tests for public office are unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. Voters elected the writer and builder to the council last month. I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state constitution, said H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president. Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: The following persons shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God. Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state, said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
South Carolina has been getting all the attention. So NC is doing some of their own backwards **** to make sure they're not out of the running in the battle to be the dummest southern state. South Carolina has a huge lead... ASHEVILLE ? North Carolina's constitution is clear: politicians who deny the existence of God are barred from holding office. Opponents of Cecil Bothwell are seizing on that law to argue he should not be seated as a City Council member today, even though federal courts have ruled religious tests for public office are unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. Voters elected the writer and builder to the council last month. ?I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state constitution,? said H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president. Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: ?The following persons shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God.? Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. ?I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state,? said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: ?no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.? It's amazing how many cherry pick which Constitutional demands apply these days. Tje same bunch that says the Constitution trumps State law still won't say the Second Amendment trumps local Laws. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:54:04 -0500, lil abner wrote:
jps wrote: South Carolina has been getting all the attention. So NC is doing some of their own backwards **** to make sure they're not out of the running in the battle to be the dummest southern state. South Carolina has a huge lead... ASHEVILLE ? North Carolina's constitution is clear: politicians who deny the existence of God are barred from holding office. Opponents of Cecil Bothwell are seizing on that law to argue he should not be seated as a City Council member today, even though federal courts have ruled religious tests for public office are unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. Voters elected the writer and builder to the council last month. ?I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state constitution,? said H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president. Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: ?The following persons shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God.? Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. ?I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state,? said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: ?no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.? It's amazing how many cherry pick which Constitutional demands apply these days. Tje same bunch that says the Constitution trumps State law still won't say the Second Amendment trumps local Laws. Like the bible, the second amendment is misinterpretted based on the party's point of view. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 10, 7:15*pm, Gene wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:33:42 -0800, jps wrote: South Carolina has been getting all the attention. So NC is doing some of their own backwards **** to make sure they're not out of the running in the battle to be the dummest southern state. South Carolina has a huge lead... ASHEVILLE North Carolina's constitution is clear: politicians who deny the existence of God are barred from holding office. Opponents of Cecil Bothwell are seizing on that law to argue he should not be seated as a City Council member today, even though federal courts have ruled religious tests for public office are unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. Voters elected the writer and builder to the council last month. I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state constitution, said H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president. Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: The following persons shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God. Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state, said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. This is the original constitution:http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nc07.asp It wasn't until 1861 revisions that the religious standards crap got added... *the Southern Baptist political power being evident.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_C...n#Article_IV_-... One nut citing a clearly infeasible provision of the constitution means nothing. -- Yep, and one nut repeatedly posting political garbage in this boating NG means nothing. Just ignore him. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:15:29 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:33:42 -0800, jps wrote: South Carolina has been getting all the attention. So NC is doing some of their own backwards **** to make sure they're not out of the running in the battle to be the dummest southern state. South Carolina has a huge lead... ASHEVILLE North Carolina's constitution is clear: politicians who deny the existence of God are barred from holding office. Opponents of Cecil Bothwell are seizing on that law to argue he should not be seated as a City Council member today, even though federal courts have ruled religious tests for public office are unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. Voters elected the writer and builder to the council last month. I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state constitution, said H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president. Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: The following persons shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God. Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state, said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. This is the original constitution: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nc07.asp It wasn't until 1861 revisions that the religious standards crap got added... the Southern Baptist political power being evident. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_C..._IV_-_Judicial One nut citing a clearly infeasible provision of the constitution means nothing. I expect it's more than one nut trying to unseat the legally elected city counsel member. Find it curious that the lead nut is a former president of the Asheville NAACP. My point is that buffoonery doesn't only exist in South Carolina. NC deserves its day in the sun. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:46:01 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:06:53 -0800, jps wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:15:29 -0500, Gene wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:33:42 -0800, jps wrote: South Carolina has been getting all the attention. So NC is doing some of their own backwards **** to make sure they're not out of the running in the battle to be the dummest southern state. South Carolina has a huge lead... ASHEVILLE North Carolina's constitution is clear: politicians who deny the existence of God are barred from holding office. Opponents of Cecil Bothwell are seizing on that law to argue he should not be seated as a City Council member today, even though federal courts have ruled religious tests for public office are unlawful under the U.S. Constitution. Voters elected the writer and builder to the council last month. I'm not saying that Cecil Bothwell is not a good man, but if he's an atheist, he's not eligible to serve in public office, according to the state constitution, said H.K. Edgerton, a former Asheville NAACP president. Article 6, section 8 of the state constitution says: The following persons shall be disqualified for office: First, any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God. Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state, said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. This is the original constitution: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nc07.asp It wasn't until 1861 revisions that the religious standards crap got added... the Southern Baptist political power being evident. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_C..._IV_-_Judicial One nut citing a clearly infeasible provision of the constitution means nothing. I expect it's more than one nut trying to unseat the legally elected city counsel member. Find it curious that the lead nut is a former president of the Asheville NAACP. My point is that buffoonery doesn't only exist in South Carolina. NC deserves its day in the sun. Wow! I guess that begs the question.... what populated geographical location can I move to that is devoid of "buffoonery." Buffoonery seems to exist everywhere humans habitate but the south has a special brand with a slow cooked, deep smokey flavor of intolerance. Nothing against your choice of location. I'm sure it has many benefits and attractions. And as you might guess, this is a Conservative Christian thing against a Heathen Liberal thing..... (probably more Conservative against Liberal than anything else). http://www,google.com/hostednews/ap/...v67hgD9CHANQO1 What a surprise. I was stunned when traveling through South Carolina at the number of churches. Seemed like there was one every 150 yards. Good organizations for seeding bad ideas. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:54:04 -0500, lil abner wrote:
jps wrote: Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution trump the restriction in the state constitution, said Bob Orr, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law. ?I think there's any number of federal cases that would view this as an imposition of a religious qualification and violate separation of church and state,? said Orr, a former state Supreme Court justice. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Maryland's requirement for officials to declare belief in God violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. Additionally, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: ?no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.? It's amazing how many cherry pick which Constitutional demands apply these days. Tje same bunch that says the Constitution trumps State law still won't say the Second Amendment trumps local Laws. it doesn't. and there's a very good reason for that. it's called 'the law'. it deals with an issue called 'incorporation'...that is, which laws do and don't apply to states and the federal govt. the legal basis is the 14th amendment to the constitution. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS:Pearson 30 1972 in North Carolina | Marketplace | |||
FS:Y adapter (2) 30's to(1) 50 in North Carolina | Marketplace | |||
Sedona to North Carolina | ASA | |||
from North Carolina to Miami | General | |||
FS: Voyage 440 Catamaran in North Carolina | Marketplace |