wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:56:51 -0400, thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:10:01 +0000, rickb308 wrote:

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:05:01 -0400, thunder
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 05:09:33 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:

What is really scary, other than your IQ, is that no WMD's were
found!
Where did they go? IS a known fact he had them, even your beloved
Clinton
believed the fact, especially the proven fact he used them on his own
people
as well as Iranians. Which country is the holder of the weapons now?
They
scary fact is that zero has been found. Means that there was a very
complete transfer out of the country.
Bill

Possibly, another explanation is that the UN inspectors were correct in
their estimation that up to 98% of the weapons were already destroyed.

Then they should have been able to point to where they were
destroyed at.

UN Inspectors have verified much of the destroyed weapons. The sticking
point has always been the verification/documentation of the remaining
weapons. There is much information on the internet about this, or do you
actually believe that Iran would accept Iraq's WMD? The same weapons
that
they had seen first hand in the Iran Iraq War, a war that cost the
Iranians 1/2 million people.

Thinking more along the lines of Syria or Libya.

Oh so you invaded the WRONG country then? so it is okay then. So the
evidence points to Libya (who you also sold weapons to ) or Syria? So you
should invade them then because it is them who are the real problem? Bit of
a US and them senario eh?



Also, you may want to consider that the weapons he had in the 1990s are
no
longer weapons. They do have a shelf live.

biological, maybe. Chemical? Who knows.

Iraq was known to produce three nerve agents, sarin, tabun, and VX.
Sarin
and tabun have a shelf live of five years. It is not known that Iraq
ever
stabilized VX.

Known. Key operating word.

Known because the US (Rumsfeld oversaw it) SOLD them Anthrax etc. Key pot
calling kettle black phrase.


If we had "known", we would have gotten Saddam.

Th Us did know. They SOLD him the stuff.

We would have
"known" where he was. Thanks to budget cuts, and not being able
to hire "thieves", our humint assests were mighty thin on the
ground. We don't "know" everything they did.


Budget cuts bollox! The Us have spent $75 billion on the currebnt Iraq
invasion. Haliburton (chaneys old employer) stand to gain $7 billion. This
is afet almost going bankrupt before the War. Clinto built up a trillion
dollars. do you look forward to your taxes increasing now that Bush has
squandered the lot?

Hell, we didn't "KNOW" that they buried 30 fully armed MIG
fighters in the sand.


But you knew that 400 migs had been flown to Iran in 1991. Lack of evidence
of something is not proof of something else. you may not know Mr x committed
rape. When you find out about Mr x does that mean Mr Y must be guilty of
murder?

We found those by accident. And we admitted
they were found by accident. Would have been easy to claim we
knew where THEY were.

Really? so before you knew about accidental discoveries you can predict
them. i might accidentaly win the lotto next week. care to predict the
numbers for me?



Without the 2nd Amendment,
the rest are just suggestions.

The 2nd Ammendment gives Us citizens the right to bear arms. does this
include nukes? How about SARIN?