"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 15:11:03 GMT, "Mark Browne"
wrote:


They said they destroyed them, and so far, it seems to be the truth. You
do
seem to think a lot of your opinion about how clueless the inspectors
are.
Perhaps you wish to go over to the middle east and show these stupid
inspectors how to search of the "missing" WMDs. I have a shovel, if you
want to go over and dig up the missing weapons I would be happy to borrow
it
to you. Until then, the preponderance of evidence is that the weapons are
destroyed.

Ah..Mark..there is no evidence, other than a claim by Saddam, that
they were destroyed. A paper trail. Period. And the paper trail itself
had serious holes in it, given a number of WMD that simply did not
appear in the claim, that the UN had indeed verified the Iraqis had in
their arsenal.

Ah gunner. If I accuse you of murder and you end up in court and the
prosecution claim loads and loads of evidence is it then up to you to
produce proof that you did not commit the murder? Or is it that you are
assumed not to have done so and the prosecution have to actually produce the
evidence? So where is this evidence? "I swrae your honour Exibhit A was
there only last week" is not evidence.