Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

....than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
--

John H

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Nov 27, 7:09*am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Nov 27, 9:14*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200....
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But scientists don't know anything. We need to listen to Rush,
Hannity, and the GOP.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.
"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "
http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7
or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--
John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....
Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But scientists don't know anything. We need to listen to Rush,
Hannity, and the GOP.

Now who is talking political spin?

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Nov 27, 9:23*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.
"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "
http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7
or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200....
--
John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....
Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But scientists don't know anything. We need to listen to Rush,
Hannity, and the GOP.

Now who is talking political spin?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just replying. It's true. Take global warming for instance. Ask just
about any conservative. The scientists and all of the compiled data is
just plain stupid. Rush and Hannity say that global warming isn't
happening, so disregard all of that data, right?

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 9:23 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.
"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "
http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7
or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--
John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....
Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
But scientists don't know anything. We need to listen to Rush,
Hannity, and the GOP.
Now who is talking political spin?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just replying. It's true. Take global warming for instance. Ask just
about any conservative. The scientists and all of the compiled data is
just plain stupid. Rush and Hannity say that global warming isn't
happening, so disregard all of that data, right?

Sorry, I'm not going there with you. I haven't seen any conclusive data
from either camp. And I don't listen to the talking heads.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
,
says...

On Nov 27, 7:09*am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

In article ,
says...

Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.

Maybe we can use it to heat democrats political offices;) JK loog..
jk...

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
,
says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.


You are not equipped mentally or physically to fight back.


--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

In article a06b6f1a-9f26-4d40-b55c-28f71591fc23
@e23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 27, 9:23*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.
"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "
http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7
or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--
John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....
Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But scientists don't know anything. We need to listen to Rush,
Hannity, and the GOP.

Now who is talking political spin?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just replying. It's true. Take global warming for instance. Ask just
about any conservative. The scientists and all of the compiled data is
just plain stupid. Rush and Hannity say that global warming isn't
happening, so disregard all of that data, right?

Well, I am sure we can talk this out as long as the ICPP, Daily Kos, New
York Lies, Jon Stewart, line of "settled science" and the idea that a
majority of scientists are supporting the idea of man made heating, can
be dismissed too... Because there is no majority of scientists
supporting it, and so many of them have been caught fudging numbers..
The real question is why would any scientist make an assumption on
proven false information?

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:09:37 -0500, John H
wrote:

...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

Sounds like political BS to me.
"Change" would be an energy task force quickly coming up with
legislation to help fund nukes NOW, without regard to climate change
legislation. Energy policy is energy policy, and everybody already
knows that nukes are "climate-friendly."
Doubt it would meet much resistance in Congress beyond the nominal
anti-nuke greenies.
Instead, it's classic DC bet-hedging, finagling and stalling.
And nothing is happening. Just talk. Just talk.
Nothing will happen until car gas hits 5 bucks a gallon.
Money talks, bull**** walks.
Hey, what does that mean anyway? Never saw bull**** really walk.
It can creep along a bit when still warm though.

--Vic

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
,
says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.

You couldn't fight your way out of a grocery sack. They only reason
Tom pretends you are his friend, is you are so dumb, when he is standing
next to you, he doesn't look like a FLEEG.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

H the K wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
, says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...

--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.


You are not equipped mentally or physically to fight back.


Poser.

I don't use a PC or Windoze.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Spoofed...moronic grammar.


H the K wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
, says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...

--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.

You couldn't fight your way out of a grocery sack. They only reason
Tom pretends you are his friend, is you are so dumb, when he is standing
next to you, he doesn't look like a FLEEG.



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Spoofed...a smart person would know the word is poseur, not poser.


H the K wrote:
H the K wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
,
says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...

--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for
well over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.


You are not equipped mentally or physically to fight back.


Poser.

I don't use a PC or Windoze.



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
--

John H


It's essential that we look at all the alternatives. Nuclear needs lots of
regulation to ensure its safety, but it's doable. I just heard though there
was another incident at 3-Mile Island. I hope it wasn't as serious as the
last time.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government is
broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:11:20 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Don't recall them being elected to the US Presidency...

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:05:37 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:09:37 -0500, John H
wrote:

...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

Sounds like political BS to me.
"Change" would be an energy task force quickly coming up with
legislation to help fund nukes NOW, without regard to climate change
legislation. Energy policy is energy policy, and everybody already
knows that nukes are "climate-friendly."
Doubt it would meet much resistance in Congress beyond the nominal
anti-nuke greenies.
Instead, it's classic DC bet-hedging, finagling and stalling.
And nothing is happening. Just talk. Just talk.
Nothing will happen until car gas hits 5 bucks a gallon.
Money talks, bull**** walks.
Hey, what does that mean anyway? Never saw bull**** really walk.
It can creep along a bit when still warm though.

--Vic

I think someone told them that the smart folks aren't going to believe
their bull**** unless they talk serious action. Nuclear power is
serious action. But, we'll see if it's more than just talk so they'll
get taken seriously.

If Al Gore invests in nuclear power, then I'll believe they're
serious.
--

John H

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:35 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 27, 7:09*am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Perhaps you should learn to read for content instead of making quick
judgements.

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

I don't expect a response, 'cause you got snared in your own pitiful
trap.
--

John H

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Nov 28, 8:19*am, John H wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:35 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09*am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200....
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Perhaps you should learn to read for content instead of making quick
judgements.

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

I don't expect a response, 'cause you got snared in your own pitiful
trap.
--

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then what you "expect" is, well, wrong. You don't think this post of
yours is political bull****? Then what's it about? Boats? Fishing?
Photography?

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government is
broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

He spent several yearse practicink with a teleprompter. Thats my boy. I
am soooo prout of him.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.


It is an art that any good uzed car salseman masters early on in his
career.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:11:20 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Don't recall them being elected to the US Presidency...
They were lacking one key ingredient. Can you guess what it is?

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these people
president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

H the K wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

He spent several yearse practicink with a teleprompter. Thats my boy. I
am soooo prout of him.


Keep it up. Has the real WAFA shut his fat ass pie hole and left the
building?

Rob

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government is
broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.


Sure. That's a fair comparison. So a guy that can speak well can spend
our money however he wants?


Rob

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


Having trouble understanding simple comments Swill?
I recommend jumping on the bandwagon until the Christmas Season.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Don White wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.
Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


Having trouble understanding simple comments Swill?
I recommend jumping on the bandwagon until the Christmas Season.



I can't tell these right-wing Californicators apart...is there a guide?



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


Having trouble understanding simple comments Swill?
I recommend jumping on the bandwagon until the Christmas Season.


You get more stupid and asinine as the the year progresses. It is you who
talks about drinking and the booze you love. You seem to be the alcoholic.
As well as stupid.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.
Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.

The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.



As are most of the other right-wing morons who post here.
Women they can't control are...their worst fear and threat.
You should be home, in the kitchen, barefoot, and, hopefully, pregnant.

Most of the right-wing morons here never ever even mention their
wives. Probably for good reason.




--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to
win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.
Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous
is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.

The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.



As are most of the other right-wing morons who post here.
Women they can't control are...their worst fear and threat.
You should be home, in the kitchen, barefoot, and, hopefully, pregnant.

Most of the right-wing morons here never ever even mention their
wives. Probably for good reason.


I doubt their wives would wanr to be publicly associated with them.

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to
win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing
federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear
power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.
Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous
is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.

The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.



As are most of the other right-wing morons who post here.
Women they can't control are...their worst fear and threat.
You should be home, in the kitchen, barefoot, and, hopefully, pregnant.

Most of the right-wing morons here never ever even mention their
wives. Probably for good reason.


I doubt their wives would *wanr* to be publicly associated with them.


D'oh!..... gotta fatten my fingers up, they keep slipping off the keys.
............. should be *want*

Maybe Obama has more sense...
 

Bill McKee wrote:
"Don wrote in message
...

"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


Having trouble understanding simple comments Swill?
I recommend jumping on the bandwagon until the Christmas Season.


You get more stupid and asinine as the the year progresses. It is you who
talks about drinking and the booze you love. You seem to be the alcoholic.
As well as stupid.



You are probably right on both.

Rob