|
So typical (The New York Lies)..
jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:15 -0500, H the K wrote: H the K wrote: On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey... Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with? Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap. That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with your dog's poop. Is spoofing someone else's identity considered abuse? I think this dickhead should get reported. Who's calling who a Dickhead, Dickhead. Report your own foul language while you are at it. Glass houses, Eh. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
On 11/24/09 4:59 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news source, Fox. Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night live? Just asking, not accusing... You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't. He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax. JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you? Just looked. Thanks. Responded. Hmmmm. email must be running s...l...o...w -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:28:58 -0500, H the K
wrote: jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:15 -0500, H the K wrote: H the K wrote: On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey... Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with? Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap. That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with your dog's poop. Is spoofing someone else's identity considered abuse? I think this dickhead should get reported. Who's calling who a Dickhead, Dickhead. Report your own foul language while you are at it. Glass houses, Eh. I didnt suggest you get reported for swearing, Dickhead. You're using someone's ID to post as them. That's abuse. You're a ****ing skank but I suppose you know that already. Let's see what has to say about it. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:28:58 -0500, H the K wrote: jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:15 -0500, H the K wrote: H the K wrote: On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey... Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with? Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap. That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with your dog's poop. Is spoofing someone else's identity considered abuse? I think this dickhead should get reported. Who's calling who a Dickhead, Dickhead. Report your own foul language while you are at it. Glass houses, Eh. I didnt suggest you get reported for swearing, Dickhead. You're using someone's ID to post as them. That's abuse. You're a ****ing skank but I suppose you know that already. Let's see what has to say about it. Pansy -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:04:28 -0500, H the K
wrote: jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:28:58 -0500, H the K wrote: jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:15 -0500, H the K wrote: H the K wrote: On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey... Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with? Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap. That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with your dog's poop. Is spoofing someone else's identity considered abuse? I think this dickhead should get reported. Who's calling who a Dickhead, Dickhead. Report your own foul language while you are at it. Glass houses, Eh. I didnt suggest you get reported for swearing, Dickhead. You're using someone's ID to post as them. That's abuse. You're a ****ing skank but I suppose you know that already. Let's see what has to say about it. Pansy Jack (G)off. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:31:13 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/24/09 4:59 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news source, Fox. Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night live? Just asking, not accusing... You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't. He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax. JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you? Just looked. Thanks. Responded. Hmmmm. email must be running s...l...o...w Yeah, that's what you get with free... |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
In article ,
says... On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:31:13 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/24/09 4:59 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news source, Fox. Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night live? Just asking, not accusing... You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't. He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax. JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you? Just looked. Thanks. Responded. Hmmmm. email must be running s...l...o...w Yeah, that's what you get with free... Are you calling me cheap. I will have you know that my business is doing quite well, in fact I just hired thirty more, new editors. Didn't you see my ad on The Ladders? They are well paid, great benefits, 6 weeks a year paid vacation, and we only work three days a week. I have hidden cameras to prove it, want me to post a picture of all of them here in my basement office? I will if I have to. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:48 -0500, H the K
wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:31:13 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/24/09 4:59 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the wrote: On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next terrorist act will take out their building... Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news source, Fox. Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night live? Just asking, not accusing... You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't. He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax. JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you? Just looked. Thanks. Responded. Hmmmm. email must be running s...l...o...w Yeah, that's what you get with free... Are you calling me cheap. I will have you know that my business is doing quite well, in fact I just hired thirty more, new editors. Didn't you see my ad on The Ladders? They are well paid, great benefits, 6 weeks a year paid vacation, and we only work three days a week. I have hidden cameras to prove it, want me to post a picture of all of them here in my basement office? I will if I have to. Another asshole sock puppet. What a surprise. |
So typical (The New York Lies)..
On 11/24/09 7:26 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:48 -0500, H the K Are you calling me cheap. Another asshole sock puppet. What a surprise. They're pathetic. But that was obvious before this... :) -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com