So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:47:27 -0500, H the K wrote:


You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.


Don't forget WND, aka World Nutcase Daily.

You've probably heard already, but Murdoch is apparently close to making
a deal. Microsoft's Bing search engine will become the exclusive handler
of all things News Corp. Murdoch is a smart man, but he doesn't use the
internet, and this deal seems very flawed. It will be interesting to
watch. MediaNews is also planning to go along.

Seems fitting as Google is already run by the DNC....

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:52:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...

http://news.google.com/news?oe=UTF-8...york+times+cru
+emails&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn

That link should bring them up. I apologize. I don't know where you get
your news, but, as I use Google predominately, I'm just happy I won't
have to see all those Fox links anymore. ;-)

Just joking. I only heard about the Bing/News Corp. deal today.

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On Nov 24, 2:19*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...







On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:47:27 -0500, H the K wrote:

* You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Don't forget WND, aka World Nutcase Daily.

You've probably heard already, but Murdoch is apparently close to making
a deal. *Microsoft's Bing search engine will become the exclusive handler
of all things News Corp. *Murdoch is a smart man, but he doesn't use the
internet, and this deal seems very flawed. *It will be interesting to
watch. *MediaNews is also planning to go along.

Seems fitting as Google is already run by the DNC....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Watch out.....black helicopters.......

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

H the K wrote:
On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote:
So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was
not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited
their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey...
Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying
to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media
outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But
still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority
Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for
the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for
public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say
worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with?

Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap.



That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with
your dog's poop.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock
puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to
*communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among
the permanent
members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post,
except by accident
on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:46:01 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

The Freak accuses the NY Times of having aided Al Qaeda. Then he
turns around and suggests the terrorits attack the very establishment
which aided them...

Which is it, allies or enemies? Frenemies?

Hillbilly logic, with sincere apologies to any hillbillies. I realize
it's a serious slight to associate Snotty with any group.

That'd be great if Murdoch decides to break with Google. Won't happen
tho', he's too smart a businessman. He knows it'd not play well in
his quest to take over the world.

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you?




--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On Nov 24, 2:19*pm, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:52:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
Your search engine must be broken. *I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. *You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...

http://news.google.com/news?oe=UTF-8...york+times+cru
+emails&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn

That link should bring them up. *I apologize. *I don't know where you get
your news, but, as I use Google predominately, I'm just happy I won't
have to see all those Fox links anymore. ;-)

Just joking. I only heard about the Bing/News Corp. deal today.

I see a lot of side reporting, but still none of the direct quotes of
bodily harm, coverups, and other suspicious activity that these
letters show. The New York Lies said directly the other day they would
not post quotes because "they *may have* been aquired illegally, and
they were not meant for public view". At the same time they had no
problem posting military secrets, plans, and a "manual" on how AlQueda
information was aquired so the enemy could prepare for it... Today
they posted more quotes from documents never meant for public
consumption, of course those quotes made the previousl administration
look bad... It's a pattern of selective reporting that has plagued the
Times for over a decade...

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:15 -0500, H the K
wrote:

H the K wrote:
On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote:
So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was
not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited
their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey...
Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying
to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media
outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But
still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority
Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for
the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for
public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say
worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with?

Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap.



That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with
your dog's poop.

Is spoofing someone else's identity considered abuse? I think this
dickhead should get reported.

So typical (The New York Lies)..
 

On 11/24/09 4:29 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:39:15 -0500, H the
wrote:

H the K wrote:
On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote:
So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was
not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited
their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey...
Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying
to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media
outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But
still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority
Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for
the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for
public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say
worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with?

Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap.



That wasn't me who said that. I don't give a rats ass what you do with
your dog's poop.

Is spoofing someone else's identity considered abuse? I think this
dickhead should get reported.



Indeed. It's about all the morons have left.


--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.