|
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 12:04*pm, John H wrote:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode -- John H Heres the ****head responsible for this drivel....... http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/f...32218_8642.jpg |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"? Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science *is* doing it's job. For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of smoking gun, you may want to consider: "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/communist/ vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though." From: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/ |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote:
"University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." “Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine.” There was 160 MB of data stolen. Obviously, it would take some time to confirm if it was authentic. Obviously, someone who was willing to break the law (hacking), and post private information publicly, *might* not be above changing the data, if they have an agenda. You don't think they have an agenda, do you? This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen anything in those emails that debunks the science. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:16:36 -0600, thunder
wrote: You don't think they have an agenda, do you? You know, for a really smart guy, you have some amazing blind spots. OF COURSE THEY HAD AN AGENDA!!! Jesus - read through the material. Damn man... |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:16:36 -0600, thunder
wrote: Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen anything in those emails that debunks the science. Read the exchange between Keiller and Briffa at the bottom of this analysis. Neither one was answered. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php In fact, read the whole thing. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/23/09 7:29 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:16:36 -0600, wrote: Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen anything in those emails that debunks the science. Read the exchange between Keiller and Briffa at the bottom of this analysis. Neither one was answered. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php In fact, read the whole thing. Pimping that right-wing blog again, eh? -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:22:16 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"? Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science *is* doing it's job. It's not if data sets are hidden and results are not properly analyzed and/or included to advance a public policy agenda. For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of smoking gun, you may want to consider: "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to get rid of the MWP, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no marching orders from our socialist/communist/ vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though." From: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/ Oh please - here's the "directorship" of RealClimate. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...tributor-bios/ Notice a prominent name there? And Schmidt isn't exaclty an objective observer - he's participated in this data fraud and is a prominent eco-warrior. I don't know a lot about Dr. Ammann but I noticed a couple of interesting things in his CV - most notably this: IPCC AR4 Reviewer Synthesis Report, Chapter 9 and contributing author. Think they might have something to protect here? |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com