| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
|
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
"John H" wrote in message
... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode -- John H So, because someone is an asshole that means he must be wrong? http://ty.rannosaur.us/5-geniuses-wh...sive-assholes/ -- Nom=de=Plume |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H
wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/22/09 5:49 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. Uh-huh...and with your non-existent reputation in peer-reviewed science, you should be placed in hack with your BFF Short**** Ingersoll. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it. Another f*ing joke! -- John H |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
|
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/22/09 7:47 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... *You* are commenting on science? You? Doubtful you completed high school. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
In article ,
says... In article , om says... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch... "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John H
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it. Another f*ing joke! You want to see how it all unfolded? John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a smile on his face today. Real science might actually win the day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/22/09 9:32 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it. Another f*ing joke! You want to see how it all unfolded? John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a smile on his face today. Real science might actually win the day. Sheesh. Yet another right-wing bull**** site. No wonder SW Tom-Tom likes it. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be. I honestly don't know why it happened. I think it's an unfortunate confluence of science and politics - policy rather than procedure. From what I know about Dr. Mann, he has always been a bit of a eco-warrior and got carried away. He attracted the attention of Al Gore who sensed an opportunity and like the snake oil salesman he's always been, took advantage of it. And it snowballed from there - grants were given, studies to be made, reputations to be protected, taxes/revenue to be raised and applied, social engineering to be accomplished for the protection of the masses. I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , om says... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch... "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. Welcome to the club. :) Then again, I wouldn't be a member of any club who would have me as a member. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 8:34*pm, H the K wrote:
On 11/22/09 9:32 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports *wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it. Another f*ing joke! You want to see how it all unfolded? John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a smile on his face today. Real science might actually win the day. Sheesh. Yet another right-wing bull**** site. No wonder SW Tom-Tom likes it. Herr Krause. No wonder you can't stand it. It bothers you too much. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 6:46*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch... This is established as being the time-honoured method used by Krauss and company. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H
wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode Talk about shameless... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 8:49*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch... "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. Welcome to the club. *:) Then again, I wouldn't be a member of any club who would have me as a member. Tom, I've been kicked out of some clubs I started... so, don't feel alone. ?;^ ) |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 9:22Ā*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode Talk about shameless... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ That was gross! i agree witht he commenter that said "It reminds me of the people jumping to their deaths on 9/11. What is wrongļ»æ with the people who think this stuff up?" |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:27:14 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Nov 22, 8:49*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch... "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. Welcome to the club. *:) Then again, I wouldn't be a member of any club who would have me as a member. Tom, I've been kicked out of some clubs I started... so, don't feel alone. ?;^ ) Some how, I believe you. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 11:13 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:27:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Nov 22, 8:49 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode They will defend it by going after the messenger, you watch... "University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. Welcome to the club. :) Then again, I wouldn't be a member of any club who would have me as a member. Tom, I've been kicked out of some clubs I started... so, don't feel alone. ?;^ ) Some how, I believe you. Mann and Jones behavior in all of this has been really sleazy. Just about any real scientist (even us commercial scientists) welcome criticism of our work because then we can make it better. We try to keep away from personal attacks and realize that sometimes our critics are simply correct. Yeah, we all have egos but if you try to cover up questionable stuff, it just spirals out of control and you really end up looking foolish. Yes, I sometimes think my professional critics are being jerks but you have to keep up the pretense of civility, otherwise you end up looking stupid. You NEVER, NEVER, NEVER put things into e-mail that you would be ashamed to be published. You do not say such things on the phone either. Save it for times when you can be absolutely sure you are alone with someone else and even then be professional about it, otherwise it'll come back to bite you. Sometimes I hear my employees say nasty things about some company that has done us wrong and I tell em to watch what they say. There are people who have really done me wrong but whenever I see them at conferences, I always greet them in a friendly manner (but watch what I say to them) because this impresses people. When I hear something bad has happed to them, I make sure I make it known they have my best wishes although in reality I may wish for em to die. It is just good PR. I am almost astonished at the foolishness of these guys in the e- mails. It is either a case of arrogantly thinking they are immune to blowback or simple foolishness to such an extent that I would doubt their judgement on anything. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Nov 22, 12:04*pm, John H wrote:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode -- John H Heres the ****head responsible for this drivel....... http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/f...32218_8642.jpg |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"? Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science *is* doing it's job. For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of smoking gun, you may want to consider: "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to āget rid of the MWPā, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no āmarching ordersā from our socialist/communist/ vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though." From: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/ |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:33 -0500, BAR wrote:
"University officials confirmed the data breach, which involves more than 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, but said they could not say how many of the stolen items were authentic." āBecause of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine.ā There was 160 MB of data stolen. Obviously, it would take some time to confirm if it was authentic. Obviously, someone who was willing to break the law (hacking), and post private information publicly, *might* not be above changing the data, if they have an agenda. You don't think they have an agenda, do you? This is priceless! If you weren't a skeptic before you should be now. Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen anything in those emails that debunks the science. BTW, I've been banned from Mikey Mann's Blog. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:16:36 -0600, thunder
wrote: You don't think they have an agenda, do you? You know, for a really smart guy, you have some amazing blind spots. OF COURSE THEY HAD AN AGENDA!!! Jesus - read through the material. Damn man... |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:16:36 -0600, thunder
wrote: Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen anything in those emails that debunks the science. Read the exchange between Keiller and Briffa at the bottom of this analysis. Neither one was answered. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php In fact, read the whole thing. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/23/09 7:29 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:16:36 -0600, wrote: Why? Where's the smoking gun? The blue dress? Private emails are easily taken out of context, and even with that caveat, I haven't seen anything in those emails that debunks the science. Read the exchange between Keiller and Briffa at the bottom of this analysis. Neither one was answered. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php In fact, read the whole thing. Pimping that right-wing blog again, eh? -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:22:16 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"? Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science *is* doing it's job. It's not if data sets are hidden and results are not properly analyzed and/or included to advance a public policy agenda. For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of smoking gun, you may want to consider: "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to get rid of the MWP, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no marching orders from our socialist/communist/ vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though." From: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/ Oh please - here's the "directorship" of RealClimate. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...tributor-bios/ Notice a prominent name there? And Schmidt isn't exaclty an objective observer - he's participated in this data fraud and is a prominent eco-warrior. I don't know a lot about Dr. Ammann but I noticed a couple of interesting things in his CV - most notably this: IPCC AR4 Reviewer Synthesis Report, Chapter 9 and contributing author. Think they might have something to protect here? |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
In article ,
says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:24 -0500, John H wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:49:45 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:04:44 -0500, John H wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1258...html#printMode And look who is in the middle of this conspiracy to eliminate dissent and supress free and open scientific discovery. Michael "Mr. Hockey Stick" Mann. This guy has done more damage to national economies than anybody else in modern history. He should be put in jail to rot forever. Yup, he and his 'hockey stick' are right in the middle of it. Another f*ing joke! You want to see how it all unfolded? John Hindraker has done yeoman work on the email files. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive.../11/024995.php I can say this - Steve McIntyre feels completely vindicated and while he's too nice a guy and much to humble to toot his own horn, there's a smile on his face today. Real science might actually win the day. Pretty damning stuff... These folks are full of **** and they know it... |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
|
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
|
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/23/09 8:07 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet, says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) Why are you commenting on *science*? Unlikely you completed high school. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
In article ,
says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"? Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science *is* doing it's job. For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of smoking gun, you may want to consider: "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ?get rid of the MWP?, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no ?marching orders? from our socialist/communist/ vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though." From: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/ Your attempt to minimalize the information brought into the public domain by stating that it can't be a world-wide conspiracy because George Soros isn't involved is a nice try at deflection. What we have is a collection of "scientists" from around the world who saw global warming as a way to fatten their research budgets, bring them national and international prominence and pad their CV's. The part that is really nefarious is that they are trying with every "trick" they know to beat their critics into submission by calling the global warming deniers at the least and idiots at the most. Keep pushing the it can't be a conspiracy because George Soros isn't behind it line of crap if you want. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/23/09 8:18 AM, BAR wrote:
In inet, says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is turning out, is a bogus crisis. How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"? Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows over. Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science *is* doing it's job. For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of smoking gun, you may want to consider: "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ?get rid of the MWP?, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no ?marching orders? from our socialist/communist/ vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though." From: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/ Your attempt to minimalize the information brought into the public domain by stating that it can't be a world-wide conspiracy because George Soros isn't involved is a nice try at deflection. What we have is a collection of "scientists" from around the world who saw global warming as a way to fatten their research budgets, bring them national and international prominence and pad their CV's. The part that is really nefarious is that they are trying with every "trick" they know to beat their critics into submission by calling the global warming deniers at the least and idiots at the most. Keep pushing the it can't be a conspiracy because George Soros isn't behind it line of crap if you want. Crikey...BAR is another "scientist" who barely completed high school. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil... Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in your mind. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On 11/23/09 9:45 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil... Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in your mind. You gotta love it when Toskie comments on that which is beyond his capability of understanding, and that would would science, math, history, politics, sociology, childrearing and building of boats capable of being launched into Long Island Sound. The "over-priced orange towels..."commercial... Yes, that's something worth pondering and analyzing. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
In article ,
says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil... Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in your mind. Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects started with scale models. Problem? |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil... Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in your mind. Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects started with scale models. Problem? The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat. I also suspect you have tried it more than once. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
"H the K" wrote in message ... On 11/23/09 9:45 AM, RLM wrote: On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil... Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in your mind. You gotta love it when Toskie comments on that which is beyond his capability of understanding, and that would would science, math, history, politics, sociology, childrearing and building of boats capable of being launched into Long Island Sound. The "over-priced orange towels..."commercial... Yes, that's something worth pondering and analyzing. I could see Snotty trying to pitch 'ShamWow' cloths....pony tail & all. He'd make that Vince guy look like a movie star. |
Great Story! Lends lots of credence to the GW alarmists!
In article ,
says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good little Harrys... "Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real science? ;-) What real science? ;) ;) I am of the school of thought that looks at a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil... Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in your mind. Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects started with scale models. Problem? The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat. I also suspect you have tried it more than once. And I suppose you find yourself much more qualified? ploink |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com