In article ,
om says...

On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:34:38 -0500, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"NowNow" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Lu Powell wrote:
Bowing to foreign royalty has been a no-no for American presidents for
over 200 years. Obama didn't bow to the Japanese emperor on November
14,
2009; he was merely checking because the emperor told him his fly was
open!


I wonder what Hairy, Nom=de-Plump, et al will post to justify the bow.
Don't really care since they are banished from my computer.


It must be nice to be totally happy with being ignorant of foreign
customs, where you can criticize Obama for not being as ignorant as you
are.

Typical, unfortunately.

Doesn't matter. Not ONE of them said a damned thing when Bush did his
usual foreign customs screw ups.

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!


Bowing to the Japanese emperor by any head of a foreign state is not
customary. Perhaps you can offer proof otherwise. Until you do, I'm calling
BS on you.

Not really sure how Bush's gaffes somehow excuses totally inappropriate
behavior by "The One".

That's called the 'Bush Rationale'. If Bush did something wrong, then
it's OK and accepted for 'Bama to do the same or worse.


The biggest problem there is even if Bush didn't do something wrong,
folks will make something up... Either way, it's just a way of
deflecting from the issue at hand... Even worse is the "Rush" rational.
If you say anything that is representative of any conservative view,
it's automatically "Rush rational". Seems only conservatives understand
that Rush isn't mainstream...

Scotty.
What time is it by your watch?

In article ,
says...

Scotty.
What time is it by your watch?

Uh, 9:43 did I miss something??

I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
Scotty.
What time is it by your watch?

Uh, 9:43 did I miss something??
check your computer clock.

In article ,
says...

I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
Scotty.
What time is it by your watch?

Uh, 9:43 did I miss something??
check your computer clock.

10:17 AM... Why? Am I missing something, I did get a new computer a few
days ago, haven't really gone over it yet.

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:17:54 -0800, I am Tosk wrote:

^^^^^

10:17 AM... Why? Am I missing something, I did get a new computer a few
days ago, haven't really gone over it yet.

It must be running some Microsoft OS. GMT -0800 is Pacific Time.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:17:54 -0800, I am Tosk wrote:

^^^^^

10:17 AM... Why? Am I missing something, I did get a new computer a few
days ago, haven't really gone over it yet.

It must be running some Microsoft OS. GMT -0800 is Pacific Time.

Oh, I probably didn't set that up when I got it up and running, didn't
see it as too important. I will fix it before Harry thinks his three
months hard drive and ram "server" setup makes him a superior network
specialist.... snerk

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:17:54 -0800, I am Tosk wrote:

^^^^^

10:17 AM... Why? Am I missing something, I did get a new computer a few
days ago, haven't really gone over it yet.

It must be running some Microsoft OS. GMT -0800 is Pacific Time.

Here, how's this? Hope it's better, never really looked at it, just
booted and started running... Ohhhhh noooooooooooo Harry should have
fun with this. His Windoze Vista asked him to set that up in the
beginning, Wincoze 7 didn't ask and I "didn't tell"..

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:41:07 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:17:54 -0800, I am Tosk wrote:

^^^^^

10:17 AM... Why? Am I missing something...

40 points of IQ.

I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
Scotty.
What time is it by your watch?
Uh, 9:43 did I miss something??
check your computer clock.

10:17 AM... Why? Am I missing something, I did get a new computer a few
days ago, haven't really gone over it yet.

Maybe your version of Gravity (MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.13) isn't reading
your computer clock properly. But first set your time zone then time
into your computer clock just to be sure your clock is set right.