On 11/13/09 2:35 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:19:34 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

And this lowered your debt?

You can see how desperate


Go pound sand, tomcat. No one gives a flying fuch about your bull****
here anymore. And whatever meds you are taking for your bipolar
disorder...double them.



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to
*communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among
the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster. As always, have a nice,
simple-minded day.

H the K wrote:
On 11/13/09 2:35 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:19:34 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

And this lowered your debt?

You can see how desperate


Go pound sand, tomcat. No one gives a flying fuch about your bull****
here anymore. And whatever meds you are taking for your bipolar
disorder...double them.


Gawd, Tom was such a good friend of yours too once, like loopy. A
'responsible righty', or something, you called him.

Someone will quote my post so you can answer vicariously.

Johnson

On Nov 13, 2:29*pm, H the K wrote:
On 11/13/09 2:35 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:19:34 -0800, "Bill McKee"
*wrote:

And this lowered your debt?

You can see how desperate

Go pound sand, tomcat. No one gives a flying fuch about your bull****
here anymore.

That is to say, no one of your ilk, Herr Krause.

And whatever meds you are taking for your bipolar
disorder...double them.

Herr Krause. If he truly is bipolar as you boast, then his challenged
thought processes are far superiour to your greatest genius.

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:38:04 -0500, NowNow wrote:

In article ,
says...

"The administration wants to keep some of the unspent funds available
for emergencies, but is considering setting aside a chunk for debt
reduction, according to people familiar with the matter. It is also
expected to lower the projected long-term cost of the program -- the
amount it expects to lose -- to as little as $200 billion from $341
billion estimated in August."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125799009185344567.html

So let me see if I got this right. The Administration wants to use
borrowed money which created increased debt to pay down the overall
debt incurred by increased spending.

Son-of-a-gun. That must mean that your average citizen should be able
to decrease his/her overall debt by borrowing more money to pay down
that debt.

Huh - how about that.

Uh, speculators have been doing such forever. It can actually be quite
cost affective to borrow money at a much lower rate to pay off debt with
a higher rate of interest.

Well, that explains it. Good mind, Loogy.
--

John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
"The administration wants to keep some of the unspent funds available
for emergencies, but is considering setting aside a chunk for debt
reduction, according to people familiar with the matter. It is also
expected to lower the projected long-term cost of the program -- the
amount it expects to lose -- to as little as $200 billion from $341
billion estimated in August."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125799009185344567.html

So let me see if I got this right. The Administration wants to use
borrowed money which created increased debt to pay down the overall
debt incurred by increased spending.

Son-of-a-gun. That must mean that your average citizen should be able
to decrease his/her overall debt by borrowing more money to pay down
that debt.

Huh - how about that.


Is that something like "check kiting"?

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
"The administration wants to keep some of the unspent funds available
for emergencies, but is considering setting aside a chunk for debt
reduction, according to people familiar with the matter. It is also
expected to lower the projected long-term cost of the program -- the
amount it expects to lose -- to as little as $200 billion from $341
billion estimated in August."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125799009185344567.html

So let me see if I got this right. The Administration wants to use
borrowed money which created increased debt to pay down the overall
debt incurred by increased spending.

Son-of-a-gun. That must mean that your average citizen should be able
to decrease his/her overall debt by borrowing more money to pay down
that debt.

Huh - how about that.


You're mis-reading the information. The money is available to be borrowed.
If it isn't used, it doesn't need to be borrowed. The current projected
deficit would thus be lower, since the money isn't used. It's not like it's
sitting in a paper bag somewhere.

--
Nom=de=Plume