Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
U.S. Doctors want tort reform.
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:03:57 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: How many times is that $54 billion exceeded by cover your ass extra diagnostic tests? Actual real case. 1 - Two doctors are sued for not catching a PE (pulmonary embolism) in an otherwise healthy 50 yo woman with no prior history of asthma, heart disease, non-smoker. 2 - Husband sues for 10 million dollars. 3 - Husband wraps himself around a telephone pole in his car drunk and dies. 4 - Case is picked up by son who left home at 16 and hadn't seen or contacted his mother in five years. 5 - Son is arrested for heroin possesion with intent to distribute, assault on a police officer and various other charges. 6 - Case is picked up by sister who promptly moves to another state and drops case due to indifference. 7 - Case is transferred to Federal Court and picked up by Nephew in Nebraska. 8 - Nephew deployed to Iraq, additional plaintiff picked up - First Cousin also in Nebraska. 9 - Case moved to pre-trial where plaintiff's offered to settle for 6 million - rejected. 10 - Case moved to trial - four days. Jury takes one hour to deliberate and finds doctors not guilty with no award. 11 - Case moved to Federal Appeals and rejected. 12 - Case moved back to state court with additional plaintiff - another First Cousin. 13 Case settled for $750,000. Total years - 9. Total expenses (practice) - $650,000. Total expenses (insurance) - 2.7 million Lost wages: 1 million (practice had to be shut down for a total of four weeks) Practice legal counsel: $400,000 Total cost: $5.5 million dollars Multiply that by how many? That's where the costs are - it's not the awards - it's the defense expenses that cost. And the additional malpractice and ommissions and commissions insurance expenses to protect themselves from these trial vultures that will sue for anything and keep on suing until they get something. The only good thing that came out of this particular case by the way wsa that the plaintiffs recieved, after expenses, $3,000 apiece. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
U.S. Doctors want tort reform.
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
U.S. Doctors want tort reform.
In article ,
says... ?We found that regardless of a physician?s political affiliation, the respondents attributed the practice of defensive medicine to excessive waste in the health care system,? said Rick Jackson, chairman and CEO of Jackson Healthcare, in a statement." ~~Sorry - no can do. Gotta keep the trial lawyers busy and rich.~~ The survey found that 62 percent of physicians disagreed with the American Medical Association?s (AMA) stance on health care reform. Of those, 46 percent said they ?strongly disagree? with the AMA?s stance. http://orlando.bizjournals.com/orlan...1.html?ana=fox Heh - what a shock. Well of course!! They don't want the responsiblility on their shoulders when they hack off the wrong leg or arm.... -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For all of the naysayers about healthcare reform | General | |||
On health care reform | General | |||
Doctors Questioning Canadian Health Care | Cruising | |||
How many Doctors/ money launderers are in Africa, anyhow? | General | |||
Real Election Reform | ASA |