Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:17:05 -0800, "mgg" wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
http://www.baekdal.com/design/archit...oncept-design/
Hows about this one:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...eres-half.html

Kinda looks like 1/2 a boat.

I imagine it's fairly stable as wide as it is, but - whew - wouldn't
want to try and back down in a following sea. :)

Why would you have to. It would probably spin around easier than it
could back down. Or go forward for that matter. It sure would diminish
the worry of broaching.

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:10:10 -0500, Jim wrote:

I imagine it's fairly stable as wide as it is, but - whew - wouldn't
want to try and back down in a following sea. :)

Why would you have to.


Big fish on, spooling your reel... :-)

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:10:10 -0500, Jim wrote:

I imagine it's fairly stable as wide as it is, but - whew - wouldn't
want to try and back down in a following sea. :)
Why would you have to.


Big fish on, spooling your reel... :-)


Shut up ;-)