On Nov 10, 12:45*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article e212c9c8-1087-4d38-a24e-
, says...





On Nov 9, 10:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

...

jps wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:52:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
*wrote:

*wrote in message
...

ABC News is reporting that U.S. agencies were aware months ago that
Fort Hood shooting suspect Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan sought to contact
people associated with al Qaida, according two American officials
familiar with the case. "It is not known whether the intelligence
agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to
connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said," ABC
writes.

I thought this problem was addressed when the DHS was created .. years
ago... the siloing of information. If it's true, heads should roll. They
knew about him, did nothing, and they were going to deploy him???

Seems clear that whomever was in possession of that info didn't pass
it along to the Army. *If the Army knew, that's a whole other kettle
of fish.

Or a government cover-up.

Rob

Yeah, there are always consipracy theories. They rarely hold up to scrutiny.

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Man, the unhinged right wingers here are no doubt wringing their hands
trying to figure out a way to blame this on Obama! "Rob" appears to be
giving it a try!

See my earlier posts, hope I get credit for those... I wonder how long
it will take the far lefties here to blame it on Bush.. Oh wait, they
already did with the comments about DHS. Harryism all the way...

DHS is under Obama appointee Napolitano who thinks returning vets are
terrorists. Obama doesnt think terrorism exists, only "human caused
disasters". Because DHS under Napolitano was not interested in
Islamic terrorists, it never got any attention. Now, let us review:
Who appointed Napolitano? Who did Napolitano think was dangerous?
Who de-emphasized Islamic Terrorism...... So, who is at fault here?