November 6, 2009
Palin to keep low-profile on Wisconsin trip


(CNN) - Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is set to deliver remarks at a
Wisconsin Right to Life event Friday evening, one of the few speeches
the former Republican vice presidential nominee will have given since
she resigned the governorship last summer.

But Palin appears to be doing her best to keep a low profile on this
trip: no press will be allowed into the Milwaukee auditorium where she
will speak and those who have paid the $30 admittance fee are unable to
carry in cell phones, cameras, laptops, or recording devices of any kind.

Wisconsin Democratic Party Chairman Mike Tate told the Wisconsin Radio
Network he finds all these restrictions "bizarre."

"You know, for someone who claims to be a rogue and isn't afraid of what
other people think it really is sort of hypocritical to not let the
media, the press cover your event."

Meanwhile Wisconsin Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus said he's
excited Palin is coming to his state, but stressed the party has nothing
to do with this event or its limitations.

Palin's speech comes a day after a new national poll suggests the former
Alaska governor may face some obstacles should she decide to run for the
White House. According to the new Gallup survey, only about one in three
Americans would seriously consider casting their vote for her.

The speech also comes a week and half before Palin's highly-anticipated
memoir "Going Rogue: An American Life" is released. The Alaska
Republican will commence a national book tour soon after and sit down
for high-profile interviews with Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters.

- - -

I wonder how much SW Tom is contributing to the campaign of his heroine?

Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.

TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.

I have to say that she does not irritate me, the thinking that brought
her to us as an acceptable candidate for vice president does irritate me.

Those who help bring incompetent leadership, those irresponsible enough
to not realize that this is a serious issue, irritates me.

Those who can't see that Sara Palin, while maybe being fun for you guys,
is in danger of being in a position of authority. Nuclear weapons. War.

History will show W. as being irresponsible, who do you guys want,
insist, that the Republican party be one of irresponsibility?

You have had your fun, now go find a competent leader, if you can't
leave it to the adults.

In article ,
says...

TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.

I have to say that she does not irritate me, the thinking that brought
her to us as an acceptable candidate for vice president does irritate me.

Those who help bring incompetent leadership, those irresponsible enough
to not realize that this is a serious issue, irritates me.

Those who can't see that Sara Palin, while maybe being fun for you guys,
is in danger of being in a position of authority. Nuclear weapons. War.

History will show W. as being irresponsible, who do you guys want,
insist, that the Republican party be one of irresponsibility?

You have had your fun, now go find a competent leader, if you can't
leave it to the adults.

Obama, Obama, Obama. How's that 10.2% unemployment working out for you
Jim? The $787 billion stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8%.

I would rather have Palin with her finger on the button than have Obama
giving the button to our enemies.

On 11/8/09 8:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.

I have to say that she does not irritate me, the thinking that brought
her to us as an acceptable candidate for vice president does irritate me.

Those who help bring incompetent leadership, those irresponsible enough
to not realize that this is a serious issue, irritates me.

Those who can't see that Sara Palin, while maybe being fun for you guys,
is in danger of being in a position of authority. Nuclear weapons. War.

History will show W. as being irresponsible, who do you guys want,
insist, that the Republican party be one of irresponsibility?

You have had your fun, now go find a competent leader, if you can't
leave it to the adults.

Obama, Obama, Obama. How's that 10.2% unemployment working out for you
Jim? The $787 billion stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8%.

I would rather have Palin with her finger on the button than have Obama
giving the button to our enemies.



Well, of course. You're a moron.

BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.
I have to say that she does not irritate me, the thinking that brought
her to us as an acceptable candidate for vice president does irritate me.

Those who help bring incompetent leadership, those irresponsible enough
to not realize that this is a serious issue, irritates me.

Those who can't see that Sara Palin, while maybe being fun for you guys,
is in danger of being in a position of authority. Nuclear weapons. War.

History will show W. as being irresponsible, who do you guys want,
insist, that the Republican party be one of irresponsibility?

You have had your fun, now go find a competent leader, if you can't
leave it to the adults.

Obama, Obama, Obama. How's that 10.2% unemployment working out for you
Jim? The $787 billion stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8%.

I would rather have Palin with her finger on the button than have Obama
giving the button to our enemies.



You make no sense to me. I don't see "Obama giving the button to our
enemies." Be specific, please. None of the Fox News/Roger Ailes method
of grabbing something with a thread of truth, then taking it to an
unexplainable extreme.

The "Death Panels" is a great example. Don't do it, back up what you say.

I'll be specific about the Republicans if you'd like. Bush took a
surplus and turned it into a deficit by giving supposedly temporary tax
cuts, intended to boost our economy. The 10.2 is a legacy of Bush.

The temporary-ness was a lie and everyone knows it. This is ok with you
because you accept and or ignore reality. When they expire you will
back up the argument that it's a tax increase. They play you for a fool
and it's ok with you.

Not ok with me, the results tell us how successful the Bush tax cut
economy was. Accept the fact that taxes pay for things you want to do,
like the wars.

Who pays for things in your economy?

If you stick to backing Palin the only excuse is that you are confirming
you are the fool Roger Ailes thinks you are.

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:49:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.
I have to say that she does not irritate me, the thinking that brought
her to us as an acceptable candidate for vice president does irritate me.

Those who help bring incompetent leadership, those irresponsible enough
to not realize that this is a serious issue, irritates me.

Those who can't see that Sara Palin, while maybe being fun for you guys,
is in danger of being in a position of authority. Nuclear weapons. War.

History will show W. as being irresponsible, who do you guys want,
insist, that the Republican party be one of irresponsibility?

You have had your fun, now go find a competent leader, if you can't
leave it to the adults.

Obama, Obama, Obama. How's that 10.2% unemployment working out for you
Jim? The $787 billion stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8%.

I would rather have Palin with her finger on the button than have Obama
giving the button to our enemies.



You make no sense to me. I don't see "Obama giving the button to our
enemies." Be specific, please. None of the Fox News/Roger Ailes method
of grabbing something with a thread of truth, then taking it to an
unexplainable extreme.

That's all they have. I know you've come to expect that you will not
get rational discourse in response.

In article ,
says...

You make no sense to me. I don't see "Obama giving the button to our
enemies." Be specific, please. None of the Fox News/Roger Ailes method
of grabbing something with a thread of truth, then taking it to an
unexplainable extreme.

Obama is subservient to third world dicators.

The "Death Panels" is a great example. Don't do it, back up what you say.

The provision was in the bill. The provisions was pointed out by Palin.
The provision was removed from the bill. How can you remove what was
never there?


I'll be specific about the Republicans if you'd like. Bush took a
surplus and turned it into a deficit by giving supposedly temporary tax
cuts, intended to boost our economy. The 10.2 is a legacy of Bush.

A surplus is an accounting trick. Try this sometime. Take all of the
revenue and put it into a bucket. Then pay all the oblications from the
same bucket. At the end of the year if you have any money left in the
bucket that is your surplus.

The $787 billion stimulus was, according to Obama, supposed to limit the
unemployment rate at 8%.

The temporary-ness was a lie and everyone knows it. This is ok with you
because you accept and or ignore reality. When they expire you will
back up the argument that it's a tax increase. They play you for a fool
and it's ok with you.

Does your boss give you temporary raises?

Not ok with me, the results tell us how successful the Bush tax cut
economy was. Accept the fact that taxes pay for things you want to do,
like the wars.

The Democrats in Congress couldn't wait to get to the floors of their
respective chambers to vote for war due to the upcoming election. But,
you seem to have forgotten that.

Who pays for things in your economy?

My economy? I don't believe in deficit spending.

If you stick to backing Palin the only excuse is that you are confirming
you are the fool Roger Ailes thinks you are.

2012

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to
find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her
to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you.

Keep it up, Sarah.

I have to say that she does not irritate me, the thinking that brought
her to us as an acceptable candidate for vice president does irritate me.

Those who help bring incompetent leadership, those irresponsible enough
to not realize that this is a serious issue, irritates me.

Those who can't see that Sara Palin, while maybe being fun for you guys,
is in danger of being in a position of authority. Nuclear weapons. War.

History will show W. as being irresponsible, who do you guys want,
insist, that the Republican party be one of irresponsibility?

You have had your fun, now go find a competent leader, if you can't
leave it to the adults.

Obama, Obama, Obama. How's that 10.2% unemployment working out for you
Jim? The $787 billion stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8%.

I would rather have Palin with her finger on the button than have Obama
giving the button to our enemies.


Yes, that's what scares a lot of people... the majority of Americans that
voted for Obama.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:58:21 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

Evidently she is getting to you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgGwwzRoHao