| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The 'reading of the dead'
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: I'm actually a little ashamed of myself this morning - I let He Who Must Not Be named get to me for some reason. I accidentally opened one of his nasty little comments and got carried away It's important to understand that he lives for those moments. Sociopaths have an odd way of keeping score, totaling in keeping with their mental illness. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On 11/6/09 10:26 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm actually a little ashamed of myself this morning - I let He Who Must Not Be named get to me for some reason. I accidentally opened one of his nasty little comments and got carried away It's important to understand that he lives for those moments. Sociopaths have an odd way of keeping score, totaling in keeping with their mental illness. So, you concur that tom has some sort of mental illness. good for you. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:26:40 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm actually a little ashamed of myself this morning - I let He Who Must Not Be named get to me for some reason. I accidentally opened one of his nasty little comments and got carried away It's important to understand that he lives for those moments. Sociopaths have an odd way of keeping score, totaling in keeping with their mental illness. True. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On 11/6/09 12:21 PM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:26:40 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm actually a little ashamed of myself this morning - I let He Who Must Not Be named get to me for some reason. I accidentally opened one of his nasty little comments and got carried away It's important to understand that he lives for those moments. Sociopaths have an odd way of keeping score, totaling in keeping with their mental illness. True. Your therapist tell you that, too? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:26:40 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm actually a little ashamed of myself this morning - I let He Who Must Not Be named get to me for some reason. I accidentally opened one of his nasty little comments and got carried away It's important to understand that he lives for those moments. Sociopaths have an odd way of keeping score, totaling in keeping with their mental illness. Hmmm, make that "totally". |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:26:40 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:13:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I'm actually a little ashamed of myself this morning - I let He Who Must Not Be named get to me for some reason. I accidentally opened one of his nasty little comments and got carried away It's important to understand that he lives for those moments. Sociopaths have an odd way of keeping score, totaling in keeping with their mental illness. How many of you does it take to stroke his ego back to top poster with no argument value. This post has made you his chimp too. Normally I wouldn't bother with you but I wanted to try out a different news reader after installing a new system. I possibly will return to the old version of Pan again. I don't see what "thunder" sees in the later versions of Pan. Linux - always newer and more up to date than Windows (TM) and without the hassle. I can't believe more of you haven't caught on for free. I threw a newer video card in another box and it was picked up and working when I booted. I'll connect it to the TV. I did have to use a Windows XP driver for a Linksys N wireless card. But it's all good. You keep that Gate's boy in beer money, I understand he also uses much of it for the good of mankind. So, not such a bad investment if you want someone else to name your charity. I bet I hear how well it works. If not I'll read it for myself. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:16:23 +0000, rlm wrote:
I possibly will return to the old version of Pan again. I don't see what "thunder" sees in the later versions of Pan. Linux - always newer and more up to date than Windows (TM) and without the hassle. I can't believe more of you haven't caught on for free. I think I actually might have preferred Pan previous to the 2006 rewrite, but not enough to pin it. I'm running Debian unstable, and this is the version that comes with it. It does what I need. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On 11/7/09 11:33 AM, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:16:23 +0000, rlm wrote: I possibly will return to the old version of Pan again. I don't see what "thunder" sees in the later versions of Pan. Linux - always newer and more up to date than Windows (TM) and without the hassle. I can't believe more of you haven't caught on for free. I think I actually might have preferred Pan previous to the 2006 rewrite, but not enough to pin it. I'm running Debian unstable, and this is the version that comes with it. It does what I need. Debian unstable? Is that an actual name for a linux release? :) I'm running Max OS X, 10.6.1 on my macs, and Windows Server 2003/Hybrid/Windows Home Server on my, you guessed it, Windows Home Server. OS nomenclature is so coooooooool! Oh, and under VMWare Fusion 3, I've got Windoze Vista running on my desktop, and under BootCamp, Windoze Vista on my laptop. Isn't life exciting? :) |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:41:38 -0500, H the K wrote:
On 11/7/09 11:33 AM, thunder wrote: On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:16:23 +0000, rlm wrote: I possibly will return to the old version of Pan again. I don't see what "thunder" sees in the later versions of Pan. Linux - always newer and more up to date than Windows (TM) and without the hassle. I can't believe more of you haven't caught on for free. I think I actually might have preferred Pan previous to the 2006 rewrite, but not enough to pin it. I'm running Debian unstable, and this is the version that comes with it. It does what I need. Debian unstable? Is that an actual name for a linux release? Yup, Debian does it a little different than most of the other distros. It has stable, testing, and unstable. One of the bitches about Debian, is it's slow release cycle, but by the time packages get to stable, they are well tested. Slow release cycle, but rock solid. Unstable is bleeding edge, and can break, but I've been using it for years, and have only had a broken system twice, and it was fixed within a couple of days. I wouldn't use unstable on a production server, but for home use, no worries. :) I'm running Max OS X, 10.6.1 on my macs, and Windows Server 2003/Hybrid/Windows Home Server on my, you guessed it, Windows Home Server. OS nomenclature is so coooooooool! Oh, and under VMWare Fusion 3, I've got Windoze Vista running on my desktop, and under BootCamp, Windoze Vista on my laptop. Isn't life exciting? :) What's Windows? ;-) |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 'reading of the dead'
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:06:13 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:41:38 -0500, H the K wrote: On 11/7/09 11:33 AM, thunder wrote: On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:16:23 +0000, rlm wrote: I possibly will return to the old version of Pan again. I don't see what "thunder" sees in the later versions of Pan. Linux - always newer and more up to date than Windows (TM) and without the hassle. I can't believe more of you haven't caught on for free. I think I actually might have preferred Pan previous to the 2006 rewrite, but not enough to pin it. I'm running Debian unstable, and this is the version that comes with it. It does what I need. Debian unstable? Is that an actual name for a linux release? Yup, Debian does it a little different than most of the other distros. It has stable, testing, and unstable. One of the bitches about Debian, is it's slow release cycle, but by the time packages get to stable, they are well tested. Slow release cycle, but rock solid. Unstable is bleeding edge, and can break, but I've been using it for years, and have only had a broken system twice, and it was fixed within a couple of days. I wouldn't use unstable on a production server, but for home use, no worries. :) I'm running Max OS X, 10.6.1 on my macs, and Windows Server 2003/Hybrid/Windows Home Server on my, you guessed it, Windows Home Server. OS nomenclature is so coooooooool! Oh, and under VMWare Fusion 3, I've got Windoze Vista running on my desktop, and under BootCamp, Windoze Vista on my laptop. Isn't life exciting? :) What's Windows? ;-) Pardon me if I continue to use it. The proximity and his resources have made a difference in my life and the lives of my family. Don't know if I'd feel the same if it was Eric Prince and Blackwater. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| required reading | General | |||
| Worth reading | General | |||
| You Know You've Been Reading RBC Too Much When ... | Cruising | |||
| More reading | ASA | |||
| Our Hero is Dead, Dead, Dead | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
