On Nov 5, 12:16*am, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:02:27 -0500, NotNow wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:50:43 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

BTW where was the outrage when democratic operatives were bugging Newt
Gingrich's cell phone?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Cite?
Were you in a cave in 1996 or just in denial.

Try "Martin" "Gingrich" "Cell phone"

I notice the Huffington report has taken down their article (where
Ariana was shocked) as has the DoJ

Once again. There was NO "bugging". IT WAS A CONFERENCE CALL.......get it?

It was a private conference call between a few participants not a
PUBLIC conference call. They han an expectation of privacy
If you set up a conference call between several family members to talk
about a private issue, would you think it was OK if it showed on the
internet?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes! If people are stupid enough to think that a phone call is secure,
that's their problem.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:47:39 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Once again. There was NO "bugging". IT WAS A CONFERENCE CALL.......get
it?

It was a private conference call between a few participants not a
PUBLIC conference call. They han an expectation of privacy
If you set up a conference call between several family members to talk
about a private issue, would you think it was OK if it showed on the
internet?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes! If people are stupid enough to think that a phone call is secure,
that's their problem.


So what is all the uproar about NSA then?
You can't have it both ways.
At least nobody ever said NASA was tapping your phone and making the
transcripts public.

Personally I never considered phones secure. I saw transcripts of my
phone conversations when I was a teenager ... from an illegal RFK/DoJ
tap.


If they can get a warrant, then they should be able to tap anyone's phone.
The FISA court will and has issued warrants after the fact of the tap.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:47:39 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Once again. There was NO "bugging". IT WAS A CONFERENCE CALL.......get it?

It was a private conference call between a few participants not a
PUBLIC conference call. They han an expectation of privacy
If you set up a conference call between several family members to talk
about a private issue, would you think it was OK if it showed on the
internet?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes! If people are stupid enough to think that a phone call is secure,
that's their problem.


So what is all the uproar about NSA then?
You can't have it both ways.
At least nobody ever said NASA was tapping your phone and making the
transcripts public.

Personally I never considered phones secure. I saw transcripts of my
phone conversations when I was a teenager ... from an illegal RFK/DoJ
tap.

Who were you calling?

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:49:03 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:54:12 -0500, BAR wrote:

Personally I never considered phones secure. I saw transcripts of my
phone conversations when I was a teenager ... from an illegal RFK/DoJ
tap.

Who were you calling?

My girlfriend. They had our home phone tapped because my mother was on
Hoffa's legal team. Even if the tap was not egregious enough, how
about lawyer client privilege?

Awesome!

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:54:12 -0500, BAR wrote:

Personally I never considered phones secure. I saw transcripts of my
phone conversations when I was a teenager ... from an illegal RFK/DoJ
tap.

Who were you calling?

My girlfriend. They had our home phone tapped because my mother was on
Hoffa's legal team. Even if the tap was not egregious enough, how
about lawyer client privilege?

I bet that sucked if sucked was talked about.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:54:12 -0500, BAR wrote:

Personally I never considered phones secure. I saw transcripts of my
phone conversations when I was a teenager ... from an illegal RFK/DoJ
tap.

Who were you calling?

My girlfriend. They had our home phone tapped because my mother was on
Hoffa's legal team. Even if the tap was not egregious enough, how
about lawyer client privilege?


That must have been one heck of a conversation!

--
Nom=de=Plume