Told 'ja so...
 

On 11/3/09 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:51:53 -0500, H the
wrote:

The scam is what activists are saying we need to do to "fix" it.
Basically, what ever their agenda was 30 years ago is now revived to
stop global warming. (higher gas taxes, stop eating meat. ban cars,
ZPG or whatever)


Higher gas taxes, eating less meat, driving smaller cars and
controlling population would benefit all of us, whatever the motivation.


So sell it that way and stop making up lies that this will stop global
climate change in any way at all.

It is like the Iraq war. If we had just said at the outset, this was
to stop an Iraqi/Isreali war, we could have made a rational decision.
As it was we had a lie, compounded by obfuscation and denial.
It certainly had noting to do with oil but that was what the left
said. (Saddam would have been more than happy to sell us oil at a
bargain price)
The right talked about direct threats to the US and that is BS too.



Sell it *that* way? There are many reasons to support higher gas taxes,
eating less meat, driving smaller cars and controlling population growth.

As for the Iraq war, I don't buy the reason you gave, either. It wasn't
about oil and it wasn't about preventing an Israeli/Iraqi war.

What it was about: a fallback for the Bush Administration, which, up
until the time it decided to invade Iraq, had utterly failed in its
promise to catch those responsible for planning and implementing the
9-11 attacks. It was neocon meat thrown to boobus Americanus, and meant
to help avoid a GOP debacle in the 2002 congressional elections.

It was a war started for the most cynical of reasons. Cheney should have
been indicted, arrested, convicted and imprisoned.

Told 'ja so...
 

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:02:03 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/3/09 8:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In article27f68d78-3f3c-402a-8719-b5104d433cf7
@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 3, 7:25 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Nov 3, 1:58 am, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...ronment/03gore....

Many of us have known about the GW Scam for a long time. Really not
much different than the Y2K scam that destroyed the chip industry
about a year and a half later or so....

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?

Doesn't, it's my opinion. Al Gore has been milking this for years while
preaching to us, and living like a self indulgent king...



Your opinion? You are an ill-educated moron. Why is your opinion on a
scientific matter relevant

Self-indulgent king? Al Gore? Enron, Countrywide, Adelphia, Global
Crossing, Worldcom, Goldman Sachs, Lehman, Washington Mutual, etc.,
etc., etc.

Most of 'em Republican pigs.

He picks Al Gore as the self-indulgent king?

****ing idiot.

Told 'ja so...
 

Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:48:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?
The scam is what activists are saying we need to do to "fix" it.
Basically, what ever their agenda was 30 years ago is now revived to
stop global warming. (higher gas taxes, stop eating meat. ban cars,
ZPG or whatever)

Exactly, it's the same one world crowd.. Remember the first "Earth Day"
back in the 70's? I do, we were headed for the next ice age...snerk.

THAT'S your justification for ignoring science concerning global warming????

Told 'ja so...
 

In article ,
says...

Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:48:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?
The scam is what activists are saying we need to do to "fix" it.
Basically, what ever their agenda was 30 years ago is now revived to
stop global warming. (higher gas taxes, stop eating meat. ban cars,
ZPG or whatever)

Exactly, it's the same one world crowd.. Remember the first "Earth Day"
back in the 70's? I do, we were headed for the next ice age...snerk.

THAT'S your justification for ignoring science concerning global warming????

What I am saying is the science seems to start with an agenda and get
built from that starting point..

--
Wafa free again.

Told 'ja so...
 

On 11/3/09 12:36 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:31:41 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/3/09 7:25 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Nov 3, 1:58 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...ronment/03gore....

Many of us have known about the GW Scam for a long time. Really not
much different than the Y2K scam that destroyed the chip industry
about a year and a half later or so....


And you understand this because you completed the 8th grade, right?

Y2K scam that destroyed the chip industry?

The tin has leaked into the skull. Maybe he should take the hat off
at night.

Yes, we've been chipless since 2000...didn't you know? :) There's no
more chip industry.


He'd have to remove the doo-rag, too. And if he did that, his greasy
hair would be getting into everything.

Told 'ja so...
 

On 11/3/09 12:49 PM, Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:48:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?
The scam is what activists are saying we need to do to "fix" it.
Basically, what ever their agenda was 30 years ago is now revived to
stop global warming. (higher gas taxes, stop eating meat. ban cars,
ZPG or whatever)

Exactly, it's the same one world crowd.. Remember the first "Earth Day"
back in the 70's? I do, we were headed for the next ice age...snerk.

THAT'S your justification for ignoring science concerning global warming????

What I am saying is the science seems to start with an agenda and get
built from that starting point..



It takes someone with an incomplete, crappy education to deny the
scientific method and Experimentum crucis. That someone: Tosk Ingersoll.

Told 'ja so...
 

On Nov 3, 1:43*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:48:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?

The scam is what activists are saying we need to do to "fix" it.
Basically, what ever their agenda was 30 years ago is now revived to
stop global warming. (higher gas taxes, stop eating meat. ban cars,
ZPG or whatever)

You mean like not using Freon? That actually worked, and the ozone hole has
been greatly reduced. FYI, a woman's effort.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Quit now. There is scientific research to back that up, and a lot of
conservatives just don't like that. They just need a talking head to
tell them that that isn't the case.

Told 'ja so...
 

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:58:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...nt/03gore.html

I guess it's easier for a liberal to pretend it's not a scam then to
admit to the possibility that he (or she) may have been wrong.

Just think. This is the *NEW YORK TIMES* publishing this, not the
Washington Times, Harry's favorite paper.

Told 'ja so...
 

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:48:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 3, 7:25*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Nov 3, 1:58*am, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...ronment/03gore....

Many of us have known about the GW Scam for a long time. Really not
much different than the Y2K scam that destroyed the chip industry
about a year and a half later or so....

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?

We're discussing anthropogenic global warming, the non-existent
variety. Maybe one day you'll understand the difference, and why the
scam is making folks like Gore, et al (mostly Democrats) very rich.

Told 'ja so...
 

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:44:51 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:02:03 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/3/09 8:59 AM, Tosk wrote:
In article27f68d78-3f3c-402a-8719-b5104d433cf7
@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 3, 7:25 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Nov 3, 1:58 am, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...ronment/03gore....

Many of us have known about the GW Scam for a long time. Really not
much different than the Y2K scam that destroyed the chip industry
about a year and a half later or so....

Where in that article does it say that global warming isn't happening
and is a scam?

Doesn't, it's my opinion. Al Gore has been milking this for years while
preaching to us, and living like a self indulgent king...



Your opinion? You are an ill-educated moron. Why is your opinion on a
scientific matter relevant

Self-indulgent king? Al Gore? Enron, Countrywide, Adelphia, Global
Crossing, Worldcom, Goldman Sachs, Lehman, Washington Mutual, etc.,
etc., etc.

Most of 'em Republican pigs.

He picks Al Gore as the self-indulgent king?

****ing idiot.

Watch for HK's sharp turns!