On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:56:12 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 4, 3:38*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:05:31 -0500, NotNow wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:45:38 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 3, 4:37 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:21:37 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Yes, they ignore the pipeline because it was built so that they COULD
walk under them. Many types of tundra animals use the EXACT same route
and have for thousands of years. I've been to many many drilling rigs
also. They are nasty, stinky, they use a lot of chemicals in the
process, and you can't tell me that wildlife would thrive in that
environment.
Wildlife do fine around people. They have a huge deer problem in
downtown Washington DC. I damned near hit two of them on the
Whitehurst freeway. (Georgetown)

I have also flown at low altitude over arrays of wind turbines and was
appalled at how destructive they were to the environment. *Each
required a road to service the turbine regularly and the turbines were
like ugly blotches *on the *ridges. *By contrast, the average
producing oil well can barely be noticed even from low altitude and
gas wells are even more invisible.
So, gas and oilwells don't need servicing? Funny, every one I've ever
seen has a road going to it......
The biggest danger to caribou in that situation is getting hit by a
truck.
Normally the biggest danger to caribou is they get killed by wolves
but you folks got mad when the people in Alaska tried to thin out the
wolves so I am confused. Do you really give a **** about caribou or is
this just another way to demonize oil companies?
WHOOOOOSH.......

So, let me get this straight. Because nature is what it is, and yes,
wolves eat caribou, you think that we should do anything and
everything to make sure we kill them all........just because in the
wild there is natural selection? Did you get that directly from Rush,
because that's just a dumb position. Unfortunately disease kills
children. Does that mean that we should stop keeping poison out of
their reach?

There you go with the words again, Loogy.

Go read his post. He said nothing of the sort.

Saying, "You think that we should do anything and everything to make
sure we kill them all" is a f'ing lie. You're doing a lot of that
lately. Guess who it's reminiscent of?

Uh, John, it wasn't a lie, it was a friggin QUESTION. I don't suppose
you'll apologize for calling me a liar either. Guess who that's
reminiscent of?

Your throwing a question mark in there does not change the statement.
You need to stop putting words in peoples' mouths, whether you throw a
question mark at the end or not. You know damn good and well what he
said, and it sure as **** wasn't what you said he said.

Apologize - my ass.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I asked a ****ing question. If you aren't man enough to admit your
mistake and apologize for it, so be it.

So be it.

Well, gosh, if Bush did it then a little on the side is OK for Obama,
right? (That's called the 'Bush Rationale', which you did quite well.)

Is Haliburton not employed by Obama also? Perhaps there is more there
than meets the eye. Could 'Bama be getting as much from Halliburton
(aka 'KBR') as Cheney ever dreamed of (in your mind?

http://www.crocodyl.org/wiki/kbr
--
Loogy says:

Conservative = Good
Liberal = Bad

I agree. John H