Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:35:01 -0600, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:23:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:20:59 -0600, wrote: There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. And so the sickening level of profit for the companies whose products you resell won't be affected. Good for you. Let's review, who are the buzzards? "Resell"? I can let the "sickening level of profit" go as a matter of ignorance. But, "resell"? I simply won't let that go unchallenged! Don't you resell their products for a commission, percentage? Are you owned by the insurance company or do you act independently? I thought "sickening" was appropriate given health insurers deep seated propensity to deny coverage in expensive situations. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. As to gorging, certainly both side of the aisle have done this, but the majority of Americans want healthcare reform, including a strong public option. The Republicans are feasting at the ins. companys' trough and refusing to do what their constituents want and need. At least the Democrats are doing something. It may not be enough. The bill that will come out of committee may not be perfect, but it's better than nothing and it can be fixed and updated, as most legislation is after it initially passes. The ins. companies need to have their special anti-trust status revoked. They need to be barred from excluding those with "pre-existing" conditions (which they sometimes make up as they go along), and they need to have real competition. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:39:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. As to gorging, certainly both side of the aisle have done this, but the majority of Americans want healthcare reform, including a strong public option. The Republicans are feasting at the ins. companys' trough and refusing to do what their constituents want and need. At least the Democrats are doing something. It may not be enough. The bill that will come out of committee may not be perfect, but it's better than nothing and it can be fixed and updated, as most legislation is after it initially passes. The ins. companies need to have their special anti-trust status revoked. They need to be barred from excluding those with "pre-existing" conditions (which they sometimes make up as they go along), and they need to have real competition. Do you know what the individual state regulations are for pre-x, Em? Do you know in what manner the states are influenced in the regulation of pre-x conditions by the NAICS? Are insurance companies free to be completely arbitrary with pre-x conditions? Insurance companies are very heavily regulated as it is, state by state. In my state, Unicare just pulled completely out of the health insurance market. Was this because Unicare was unable to make obscene profits? Insurance companies stop offering insurance when it's impossible to make a profit, as they should. Personally, Em, I really am not all that concerned about what the majority of Americans allegedly want. Any law, code, regulation, or edict that requires that I carry health insurance is repugnant and indecent. I have no doubt that most of the founding fathers would stand aghast at what is foisted, and proposed to be foisted, on the citizenry of this country. It's an oppressive state of affairs in which I firmly believe those early revolutionaries would find cause to revolt. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:56:47 -0800, jps wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:50:52 -0600, wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:39:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. As to gorging, certainly both side of the aisle have done this, but the majority of Americans want healthcare reform, including a strong public option. The Republicans are feasting at the ins. companys' trough and refusing to do what their constituents want and need. At least the Democrats are doing something. It may not be enough. The bill that will come out of committee may not be perfect, but it's better than nothing and it can be fixed and updated, as most legislation is after it initially passes. The ins. companies need to have their special anti-trust status revoked. They need to be barred from excluding those with "pre-existing" conditions (which they sometimes make up as they go along), and they need to have real competition. Do you know what the individual state regulations are for pre-x, Em? Do you know in what manner the states are influenced in the regulation of pre-x conditions by the NAICS? Are insurance companies free to be completely arbitrary with pre-x conditions? Insurance companies are very heavily regulated as it is, state by state. In my state, Unicare just pulled completely out of the health insurance market. Was this because Unicare was unable to make obscene profits? Insurance companies stop offering insurance when it's impossible to make a profit, as they should. Personally, Em, I really am not all that concerned about what the majority of Americans allegedly want. Any law, code, regulation, or edict that requires that I carry health insurance is repugnant and indecent. I have no doubt that most of the founding fathers would stand aghast at what is foisted, and proposed to be foisted, on the citizenry of this country. It's an oppressive state of affairs in which I firmly believe those early revolutionaries would find cause to revolt. How do you feel about having to carry auto insurance? How do you feel about having to carry home owners insurance if you've got a mortgage? Do you find either of those government foisted mandates repugnant? Yes, on the first. The second is a matter of business practicality, not a mandate by government. A mortgage company or lender will assign its own insurance to a mortgage if the homeowner fails to comply with the terms of the mortgagee to carry homeowners insurance. Similarly, a lender will require full coverage on a vehicle for which it provides a loan. This constrasts with most state requirements which is for liability only. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:01:55 -0600, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:56:47 -0800, jps wrote: On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:50:52 -0600, wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:39:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. As to gorging, certainly both side of the aisle have done this, but the majority of Americans want healthcare reform, including a strong public option. The Republicans are feasting at the ins. companys' trough and refusing to do what their constituents want and need. At least the Democrats are doing something. It may not be enough. The bill that will come out of committee may not be perfect, but it's better than nothing and it can be fixed and updated, as most legislation is after it initially passes. The ins. companies need to have their special anti-trust status revoked. They need to be barred from excluding those with "pre-existing" conditions (which they sometimes make up as they go along), and they need to have real competition. Do you know what the individual state regulations are for pre-x, Em? Do you know in what manner the states are influenced in the regulation of pre-x conditions by the NAICS? Are insurance companies free to be completely arbitrary with pre-x conditions? Insurance companies are very heavily regulated as it is, state by state. In my state, Unicare just pulled completely out of the health insurance market. Was this because Unicare was unable to make obscene profits? Insurance companies stop offering insurance when it's impossible to make a profit, as they should. Personally, Em, I really am not all that concerned about what the majority of Americans allegedly want. Any law, code, regulation, or edict that requires that I carry health insurance is repugnant and indecent. I have no doubt that most of the founding fathers would stand aghast at what is foisted, and proposed to be foisted, on the citizenry of this country. It's an oppressive state of affairs in which I firmly believe those early revolutionaries would find cause to revolt. How do you feel about having to carry auto insurance? How do you feel about having to carry home owners insurance if you've got a mortgage? Do you find either of those government foisted mandates repugnant? Yes, on the first. The second is a matter of business practicality, not a mandate by government. A mortgage company or lender will assign its own insurance to a mortgage if the homeowner fails to comply with the terms of the mortgagee to carry homeowners insurance. Similarly, a lender will require full coverage on a vehicle for which it provides a loan. This constrasts with most state requirements which is for liability only. You find the requirement to carry auto insurance repugnant? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:39:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. There was a recent post in this NG about a large number of vultures, I believe, that were seen flocking together. Here in the Midwest, one may generally see as many as 6 buzzards loitering around roadkill carcasses on the roadside, and that's about the most that will be together at anyone time, as carrion birds in this area of the country go. This morning on the way to the office, though, I saw in a recently harvested corn field a flock of about 60 buzzards foraging for leftover corn. (At least I think that's what they were doing.) I had never in my life seen so many buzzards together at one time in a single location. But, after giving it some thought, I concluded that this may not quite be the ominous portent it would seem. This may be what will ultimately defeat the health-care reform package in Washington. If all the Democrat senators are gorging themselves on scraps in the Midwest, they won't be in the Nation's Capitol present to vote on repugnant, damnable health-care reform legislation. As to gorging, certainly both side of the aisle have done this, but the majority of Americans want healthcare reform, including a strong public option. The Republicans are feasting at the ins. companys' trough and refusing to do what their constituents want and need. At least the Democrats are doing something. It may not be enough. The bill that will come out of committee may not be perfect, but it's better than nothing and it can be fixed and updated, as most legislation is after it initially passes. The ins. companies need to have their special anti-trust status revoked. They need to be barred from excluding those with "pre-existing" conditions (which they sometimes make up as they go along), and they need to have real competition. Do you know what the individual state regulations are for pre-x, Em? Do you know in what manner the states are influenced in the regulation of pre-x conditions by the NAICS? Are insurance companies free to be completely arbitrary with pre-x conditions? Insurance companies are very heavily regulated as it is, state by state. In my state, Unicare just pulled completely out of the health insurance market. Was this because Unicare was unable to make obscene profits? Insurance companies stop offering insurance when it's impossible to make a profit, as they should. Personally, Em, I really am not all that concerned about what the majority of Americans allegedly want. Any law, code, regulation, or edict that requires that I carry health insurance is repugnant and indecent. I have no doubt that most of the founding fathers would stand aghast at what is foisted, and proposed to be foisted, on the citizenry of this country. It's an oppressive state of affairs in which I firmly believe those early revolutionaries would find cause to revolt. I don't know all the facts about the entire ins. industry. I do know from personal experience that they delay and delay paying even normal claims. You send it in, they claim they never got it. You send it again and again. You fax it, talked to supervisor. Fax it to her. Still nothing. I know they look for every possible excuse not to cover things. I know that there are several cases where they had to be sued to be made to pay. They're in the paper every day. I know they cancelled an entire line of insurance rather than pay a claim. I forget the place but somewhere on the east coast. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another Congressional Scumbag | General | |||
WTB: 02 OR 03 SEA RAY SUNDANCER 550 IN THE MIDWEST | Marketplace | |||
WTB Trailer in Midwest | Marketplace | |||
FS Com-Pac 19XL in Midwest | Marketplace | |||
CT AMC Pool Sessions time and dates change | General |