Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:32 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:28 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:00 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:
.................................................. ...................
................................
I've not read one single scientific paper
that has said that CO2 emmisions are the single and only way global
warming can occur. ............................!
I'll bet the farm you have never read a scientific paper, on ANY
subject, much less global warming.
I'll also bet that you have never written a thesis.
How much or what would you like to wager on each of those?
Like I said, you never have read anything of substance. Your writing
gives you away.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you are afraid of a wager?

It's silly to keep up with this, you know that it would be impossible to
have a wager on an Internet forum, where we have no idea who we all are.

Since you can't answer the question, about the "scientific paper" you
read, or one you wrote, it's time to say good-bye.

On 11/2/09 6:49 PM, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:32 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:28 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:00 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:
.................................................. ...................
................................
I've not read one single scientific paper
that has said that CO2 emmisions are the single and only way global
warming can occur. ............................!
I'll bet the farm you have never read a scientific paper, on ANY
subject, much less global warming.
I'll also bet that you have never written a thesis.
How much or what would you like to wager on each of those?
Like I said, you never have read anything of substance. Your writing
gives you away.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you are afraid of a wager?

It's silly to keep up with this, you know that it would be impossible to
have a wager on an Internet forum, where we have no idea who we all are.

Since you can't answer the question, about the "scientific paper" you
read, or one you wrote, it's time to say good-bye.


Watch it...loogy will threaten to show up at your front door. Why he
would show up where he hasn't been invited is beyond me, but, then, I'm
not brain-damaged, as loogy is.

H the K wrote:
On 11/2/09 6:49 PM, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:32 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:28 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:00 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:
.................................................. ...................
................................
I've not read one single scientific paper
that has said that CO2 emmisions are the single and only way global
warming can occur. ............................!
I'll bet the farm you have never read a scientific paper, on ANY
subject, much less global warming.
I'll also bet that you have never written a thesis.
How much or what would you like to wager on each of those?
Like I said, you never have read anything of substance. Your writing
gives you away.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you are afraid of a wager?

It's silly to keep up with this, you know that it would be impossible to
have a wager on an Internet forum, where we have no idea who we all are.

Since you can't answer the question, about the "scientific paper" you
read, or one you wrote, it's time to say good-bye.


Watch it...loogy will threaten to show up at your front door. Why he
would show up where he hasn't been invited is beyond me, but, then, I'm
not brain-damaged, as loogy is.

JohnH keeps showing up too.

H the K wrote:
On 11/2/09 6:49 PM, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:32 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:28 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:00 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:
.................................................. ...................
................................
I've not read one single scientific paper
that has said that CO2 emmisions are the single and only way global
warming can occur. ............................!
I'll bet the farm you have never read a scientific paper, on ANY
subject, much less global warming.
I'll also bet that you have never written a thesis.
How much or what would you like to wager on each of those?
Like I said, you never have read anything of substance. Your writing
gives you away.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you are afraid of a wager?

It's silly to keep up with this, you know that it would be impossible to
have a wager on an Internet forum, where we have no idea who we all are.

Since you can't answer the question, about the "scientific paper" you
read, or one you wrote, it's time to say good-bye.


Watch it...loogy will threaten to show up at your front door. Why he
would show up where he hasn't been invited is beyond me, but, then, I'm
not brain-damaged, as loogy is.

You read every post, don't you?

-S

Stevie wrote:
H the K wrote:
On 11/2/09 6:49 PM, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:32 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:28 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:00 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:
.................................................. ...................

................................
I've not read one single scientific paper
that has said that CO2 emmisions are the single and only way global
warming can occur. ............................!
I'll bet the farm you have never read a scientific paper, on ANY
subject, much less global warming.
I'll also bet that you have never written a thesis.
How much or what would you like to wager on each of those?
Like I said, you never have read anything of substance. Your writing
gives you away.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you are afraid of a wager?

It's silly to keep up with this, you know that it would be impossible to
have a wager on an Internet forum, where we have no idea who we all are.

Since you can't answer the question, about the "scientific paper" you
read, or one you wrote, it's time to say good-bye.


Watch it...loogy will threaten to show up at your front door. Why he
would show up where he hasn't been invited is beyond me, but, then,
I'm not brain-damaged, as loogy is.

You read every post, don't you?

-S

Even I'm through reading this one. lol

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:22:16 -0800, Jim wrote:


JohnH keeps showing up too.

And you love it;

On Nov 2, 6:49*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:32 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:28 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:00 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:
.................................................. ....................
................................
I've not read one single scientific paper
that has said that CO2 emmisions are the single and only way global
warming can occur. ............................!
I'll bet the farm you have never read a scientific paper, on ANY
subject, much less global warming.
I'll also bet that you have never written a thesis.
How much or what would you like to wager on each of those?
Like I said, you never have read anything of substance. *Your writing
gives you away.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you are afraid of a wager?

It's silly to keep up with this, you know that it would be impossible to
have a wager on an Internet forum, where we have no idea who we all are.

Since you can't answer the question, about the "scientific paper" you
read, or one you wrote, it's time to say good-bye.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Buh bye.