On Nov 2, 3:28*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:48:26 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

Here, here's the direct link to YOUR post. I know you won't apologize,
Harry's not good at it neither.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/6f6b531...

That's better. That would seem to indicate that I wrote the message.
Now what the hell does that have to do with the Bush Rationale for
Obama's ****ups?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As suspected. But what *I* said was "John, you have said so here many
times that Bush can't be blamed for
the economy because Obama's on watch now. So, if Obama has to take the
heat for everything, even when the economy really went in the tank
when Bush was president, wouldn't it then be that everything that
happened when Bush was president was HIS fault? Or is there a double
standard?

To which you answered:

Cite? I didn't think so.-

And I gave you a cite. But Harry doesn't apologize for his wrongs,
either.

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:02:59 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 2, 3:28*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:48:26 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:40*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:19:25 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
Here, you owe me an apology:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:46 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

I owe you an apology for something justwaitafrekinmin... wrote?

Here, here's the direct link to YOUR post. I know you won't apologize,
Harry's not good at it neither.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/6f6b531...

That's better. That would seem to indicate that I wrote the message.
Now what the hell does that have to do with the Bush Rationale for
Obama's ****ups?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As suspected. But what *I* said was "John, you have said so here many
times that Bush can't be blamed for
the economy because Obama's on watch now. So, if Obama has to take the
heat for everything, even when the economy really went in the tank
when Bush was president, wouldn't it then be that everything that
happened when Bush was president was HIS fault? Or is there a double
standard?

To which you answered:

Cite? I didn't think so.-

And I gave you a cite. But Harry doesn't apologize for his wrongs,
either.

You didn't give a cite showing anything I said about Bush and the
economy. You presented a site showing a comment about porta potties -
which is where Obama's taking the economy.

Come on Loogy, you can do better than that.