"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???



Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???



Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."


All of which is pretty shocking. It's a scary day when Newt is the voice of
reason in the party.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???



Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."


All of which is pretty shocking. It's a scary day when Newt is the voice of
reason in the party.

Newt has turned into an appeaser.

On 10/28/09 7:16 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

"H the wrote in message
m...
On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???



Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."


All of which is pretty shocking. It's a scary day when Newt is the voice of
reason in the party.

Newt has turned into an appeaser.




As stated, right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties.

On Oct 28, 7:16*pm, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...







"H the K" wrote in message
om...
On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
*wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, *wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. *Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?

You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???

Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."

All of which is pretty shocking. It's a scary day when Newt is the voice of
reason in the party.

Newt has turned into an appeaser.

As for myself, I want less casualties brought about by a decision by
the potus. That doesn't seem to be something that BO can
accomplish... too busy playing golf and campaigning.

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 7:16 pm, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...







"H the K" wrote in message
om...
On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter
weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?

You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???

Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they
care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised
or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing
scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."

All of which is pretty shocking. It's a scary day when Newt is the voice
of
reason in the party.

Newt has turned into an appeaser.

As for myself, I want less casualties brought about by a decision by
the potus. That doesn't seem to be something that BO can
accomplish... too busy playing golf and campaigning.


I think you mean fewer causualties. We all want that. I take that on faith.
As to the rest, it sounds like a right-wing rant.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 10/28/09 4:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter
weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???



Right-wing warmongers don't give a damn about casualties. All they care
about is the projection of military force, no matter how ill-advised or
inappropriate. Further, what the righties want is for Obama to find
himself in the same morass Bush himself into. These right-wing scumbags
have an agenda, but it isn't "let's do what is good for america."


All of which is pretty shocking. It's a scary day when Newt is the voice
of
reason in the party.

Newt has turned into an appeaser.

I sincerely hope the Republican party can figure out where they should go.
If it's more toward a slightly right of center position, it'll survive. If
it continues toward the extreme right, it will end up in an unrecoverable
minority position.

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???

A decision is better than no decision.

How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in
the best political light.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote:
More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but
still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?!

The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any
troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather
in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down.

Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better
time to hit them than when they are inactive?


You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed
decision???

A decision is better than no decision.

Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than
one that isn't.

We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not
focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had
some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those
issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If
only....

How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in
the best political light.

So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a
political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right?

--
Nom=de=Plume