|
8 more...
|
8 more...
Tosk wrote:
In article , says... Tosk wrote: In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9 @o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 28, 11:49 am, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 28, 9:03 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 28, 8:59 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 27, 7:04 pm, Tosk wrote: American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs.... Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative, you're beginning to sound foolish. Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date. I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. No double standard there. That's exactly what the liberals were saying as soon as Bush took office. And yes, he IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding how best to move forward. Wow... a whole 25 minutes? It took him longer than that to clean his clubs after the last golf outing. Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. Stop making excuses for him. Obama is failing miserably at the job. They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours. Casady According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... That would be contrary to the democratic philosophy of studying the issues to death and hoping they just go away on their own. |
8 more...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:49 am, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 28, 9:03 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 28, 8:59 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 27, 7:04 pm, Tosk wrote: American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs.... Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative, you're beginning to sound foolish. Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date. I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. No double standard there. That's exactly what the liberals were saying as soon as Bush took office. And yes, he IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding how best to move forward. Wow... a whole 25 minutes? It took him longer than that to clean his clubs after the last golf outing. Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. Stop making excuses for him. Obama is failing miserably at the job. They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours. Casady According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. That's why he's trying to make a good decision vs. some decision. I know this upsets you. Sorry. That's a 180 from his strategy on health care. He couldn't get a healthcare plan done fast enough. Didn't matter what it contained. And the big money giveaway. How good was that decision. You really have your head up your ass, as do most of the libs here. |
8 more...
|
8 more...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... Tosk wrote: In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9 @o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 28, 11:49 am, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 28, 9:03 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 28, 8:59 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 27, 7:04 pm, Tosk wrote: American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs.... Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative, you're beginning to sound foolish. Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date. I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. No double standard there. That's exactly what the liberals were saying as soon as Bush took office. And yes, he IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding how best to move forward. Wow... a whole 25 minutes? It took him longer than that to clean his clubs after the last golf outing. Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. Stop making excuses for him. Obama is failing miserably at the job. They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours. Casady According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Lol Lol Right baby. You're on a roll now. Got any more dumb crap to say? |
8 more...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:26:17 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Heh - oh yeah - always an excuse. "The Vietcong won't attack - it's TET". Seem like I heard that one before - twice. Yeah, well, being you brought up Vietnam, there are several things we should have learned then, that are applicable now. Propping up corrupt governments doesn't work. Forcing our values on a population that doesn't share them, is counterproductive. Perhaps, most important, strictly military solutions are unsuccessful in a counterinsurgency. The Soviets learned these in Afghanistan, but apparently "Bring 'em on" Bush was a little slow to learn those lessons. This country gave GWB seven years with Afghanistan on the back burner. I'm willing to give Obama some months to sort his strategies out. With the instability reaching into Pakistan, I want the right decision, not the quick one. |
8 more...
In article ,
says... According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Somebody needs to tell Obama that the enemy is not us it is them, those who want to see us destroyed. |
8 more...
In article ,
says... And Bush was warned by the Clinton administration and WENT ON VACATION. What a hero. Obama is hunting for terrorists one golf hole at a time. |
8 more...
On Oct 29, 8:14*am, BAR wrote:
In article , says... And Bush was warned by the Clinton administration and WENT ON VACATION. What a hero. Obama is hunting for terrorists one golf hole at a time. Come on, I always thought that you were brighter than those that instantly think that everything liberal is bad, everything conservative is good. The thing about golf is dishonest. Bush didn't care much for golf. If you take the VACATION time spent, Bush took much more time off than Obama. |
8 more...
On Oct 28, 10:14*pm, Tosk wrote:
In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9 @o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 28, 11:49*am, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Oct 28, 10:23*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 28, 9:03*am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 28, 8:59*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 27, 7:04*pm, Tosk wrote: American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs.... Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative, you're beginning to sound foolish. Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date. I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. No double standard there. *That's exactly what the liberals were saying as soon as Bush took office. And yes, he IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding how best to move forward. Wow... a whole 25 minutes? *It took him longer than that to clean his clubs after the last golf outing. Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. *Stop making excuses for him. *Obama is failing miserably at the job. They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours. Casady According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. *These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. *While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But according to John, if it happened on Bush's watch, it's all him! |
8 more...
In article , says...
nom=de=plume wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... Tosk wrote: In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9 @o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 28, 11:49 am, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 28, 9:03 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 28, 8:59 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 27, 7:04 pm, Tosk wrote: American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs.... Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative, you're beginning to sound foolish. Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date. I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. No double standard there. That's exactly what the liberals were saying as soon as Bush took office. And yes, he IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding how best to move forward. Wow... a whole 25 minutes? It took him longer than that to clean his clubs after the last golf outing. Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. Stop making excuses for him. Obama is failing miserably at the job. They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours. Casady According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Lol Lol Right baby. You're on a roll now. Got any more dumb crap to say? Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... |
8 more...
|
8 more...
In article ,
says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive. |
8 more...
On 10/29/09 8:58 AM, Tosk wrote:
Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... There's nothing funnier on rec.boats than tosk, aka justhate, aka scott ingersoll, trying so hard to convince everyone else *he* is not the group's ranking dimwit. |
8 more...
|
8 more...
BAR wrote:
In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive. If you spent 20 years listening to Jeramiah Wright, you'd hate America too. |
8 more...
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:11:40 -0400, H the K
wrote: Morons like you are a bigger threat to this country than your typical Afghani. Osama is a Saudi. The typical Afghani wants us out, and for the Talaban to butt out as well. Casady |
8 more...
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive. Do you actually believe yourself? You left out being born in Kenya (or was it Australia?). You are a right-wing nut! -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:26:17 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Heh - oh yeah - always an excuse. "The Vietcong won't attack - it's TET". Seem like I heard that one before - twice. Yeah, well, being you brought up Vietnam, there are several things we should have learned then, that are applicable now. Propping up corrupt governments doesn't work. Forcing our values on a population that doesn't share them, is counterproductive. Perhaps, most important, strictly military solutions are unsuccessful in a counterinsurgency. The Soviets learned these in Afghanistan, but apparently "Bring 'em on" Bush was a little slow to learn those lessons. This country gave GWB seven years with Afghanistan on the back burner. I'm willing to give Obama some months to sort his strategies out. With the instability reaching into Pakistan, I want the right decision, not the quick one. Yeah, but in the mean time, can we at least defend ourselves? From what do you get the impression that we aren't? Even if he decided to increase troops today, it'll take months for any to get there. -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... nom=de=plume wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... Tosk wrote: In article 2daf2bfb-bfb9-4b9f-a9a9-1150fbbfb1f9 @o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 28, 11:49 am, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 28, 9:03 am, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 28, 8:59 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Oct 27, 7:04 pm, Tosk wrote: American soldiers killed while Obama campaigns for democrats in New Jersey. Disgusting how the left has no problem with this, after all the crap they gave Bush.. Double standard and tingles up their legs.... Honest Scott, in your quest to **** on everything not conservative, you're beginning to sound foolish. Do you not remember the minority media during the Bush admin. Just want to see some balanced ideas. This double standard is ridiculous and dangerous for our country. And yes, I remember clearly Obama saying clearly "I will listen to my generals in the field" during the campaign, and clearly, he is not, that is important. Much more important than Scooter Libby forgetting a date. I'll tell you a double standard. John claims that anything that happened during the Bush administration is of now, gone. No double standard there. That's exactly what the liberals were saying as soon as Bush took office. And yes, he IS listening to his generals. He met for 25 minutes recently regarding how best to move forward. Wow... a whole 25 minutes? It took him longer than that to clean his clubs after the last golf outing. Surely those 8 lives are worth more than 25 minutes. Stop making excuses for him. Obama is failing miserably at the job. They are no better or worse than the other 4000+ who have died. At three minutes each it would come to about 1700 hours. Casady According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Lol Lol Right baby. You're on a roll now. Got any more dumb crap to say? Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:19:53 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:40:04 -0500, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:42:51 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Frankly, I honestly don't care either. However, again to be fair and balanced, the media and the Left made a big deal about President Bush's golf outings during times of economic stress and two wars. So why aren't they making the same comparision for President Obama who has, as of today, made more golf outings in the first nine months of his Administration than Bush did in three years of his administration under the same conditions? Do you really think it's fair to compare Obama with some idiot who gave up golf "in solidarity" with dying soldiers? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051302783.html Yes I do. He gave it up direcly because of the criticism. Call it what you will. I don't care one way or the other as I said. What's fair is fair. I'll say it again. Golf is a decadent sport and any Prez who's out there all smilin' and jiving with his buddies while our soldiers are dying can't get enough criticism. Looks like Obama has had no reporter yet film him and ask him about the guys getting blown away while he's on the links. Why is that? This damn "sport" should off-limits for any Prez. Hell, even playing poker while drinking scotch looks better. Or bowling with a beer on the scorecard. Golf is just plain silly, and makes anybody look silly. There, I said it. Just what I think. --Vic I think mountain biking and fishing look just as silly when put in context of our fellow Americans getting killed. Choose your poison. |
8 more...
On 10/29/09 1:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message . .. In , says... wrote in message . .. In , says... wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive. Do you actually believe yourself? You left out being born in Kenya (or was it Australia?). You are a right-wing nut! Indeed he is. |
8 more...
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. In article , says... According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Somebody needs to tell Obama that the enemy is not us it is them, those who want to see us destroyed. Someone needs to tell you that continually claiming he's doing nothing is making you look foolish, except among the 19% who self-identify as Republicans I guess. -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. In article , says... And Bush was warned by the Clinton administration and WENT ON VACATION. What a hero. Obama is hunting for terrorists one golf hole at a time. Are you hunting for an intelligent response? Keep hunting! -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
On Oct 29, 9:07*am, BAR wrote:
In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. *Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first.. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hoooo BOY!!! Right out of Rush's playbook..... |
8 more...
In article 76a7aed3-212c-477e-a236-
, says... On Oct 29, 9:07*am, BAR wrote: In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. *Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hoooo BOY!!! Right out of Rush's playbook..... Do you really listen to Rush that often, cause most here consider him an entertainer like Jeff Dunham.. Maybe you are just trying to insult us, I donno' but it really isn't working... |
8 more...
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. |
8 more...
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:47:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... In article , says... According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Somebody needs to tell Obama that the enemy is not us it is them, those who want to see us destroyed. Someone needs to tell you that continually claiming he's doing nothing is making you look foolish, except among the 19% who self-identify as Republicans I guess. They're keeping faith and staying the course. So what if the car went off the road 3 miles back? |
8 more...
"jps" wrote in message
... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
"jps" wrote in message
... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:47:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... In article , says... According to the libs, those others died on Bush's watch, but he can no longer do anything about it. These new ones are dieing on BO's watch. While he plays golf and... does nothing. What gets me is the 3000 killed on 911 were blamed only on Bush when it's obvious most of the planning and execution was started during the Clinton years. Now the Dems insist that everything happening now is all on Bush, it's that old double standard again... A lot of **** slipped by ol Bill while he was getting his axle greased. That's not my point. My point is it's time for Obama to man up and take start making a stand... No. He's already done that by standing up to people like you. Somebody needs to tell Obama that the enemy is not us it is them, those who want to see us destroyed. Someone needs to tell you that continually claiming he's doing nothing is making you look foolish, except among the 19% who self-identify as Republicans I guess. They're keeping faith and staying the course. So what if the car went off the road 3 miles back? Near Dick Cheney's undisclosed location no doubt. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article 76a7aed3-212c-477e-a236- , says... On Oct 29, 9:07 am, BAR wrote: In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hoooo BOY!!! Right out of Rush's playbook..... Do you really listen to Rush that often, cause most here consider him an entertainer like Jeff Dunham.. Maybe you are just trying to insult us, I donno' but it really isn't working... Maybe it was a complement attempt. -- Nom=de=Plume |
8 more...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. If you haven't guessed by now, JpS is..............................well.............. ................um................................ ...........gay Have him send you a snapshot. Let us know if you think he's hot. |
8 more...
Tosk wrote:
In article 76a7aed3-212c-477e-a236- , says... On Oct 29, 9:07 am, BAR wrote: In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hoooo BOY!!! Right out of Rush's playbook..... Do you really listen to Rush that often, cause most here consider him an entertainer like Jeff Dunham.. Maybe you are just trying to insult us, I donno' but it really isn't working... Jeff Dunham is really cool. When Harry posts I can't help getting a mental picture of his character, Walter. I'm working on an image for plume too. Olive Oyl, Tinkerbell, or Miss Piggy? What do you think? |
8 more...
In article ,
says... nom=de=plume wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. If you haven't guessed by now, JpS is..............................well.............. ................um................................ ...........gay Have him send you a snapshot. Let us know if you think he's hot. He won't send a snapshot. These guys are so embarrassed by the way they act here, they are scared to death somebody might identify them and their friends will find out what liars and idiots they are... |
8 more...
In article ,
says... Tosk wrote: In article 76a7aed3-212c-477e-a236- , says... On Oct 29, 9:07 am, BAR wrote: In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 28, 11:52 am, thunder wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:24:16 -0700, Jack wrote: More than fair. The idiot in office now won't make a decision, but still plays tons of golf while soldiers die. WTF!?! The need isn't to hurry. The need is to get the decision right. Any troop increases won't be needed until the spring, as the winter weather in Afghanistan pretty much shuts the Taliban down. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers. Besides, what better time to hit them than when they are inactive? You want more dead soldiers and grieving families because of a rushed decision??? A decision is better than no decision. Correct. And, a well-thought through decision is significantly better than one that isn't. How many men and women will have to die for Obama to make his well- thought through decision? Have you ever heard of paralysis through analysis? You are seeing it in action with Obama. We've got plenty of recent experience with ill-conceived decisions, like not focusing on Afganistan and invading Iraq for no good reason. If only we had some non-political decisions from the Bush administration on just those issues (not to mention the countless others) that put the country first. If only.... Every decision Obama makes is a political decision. He is currently trying to figure out how to keep the ultra left wing of the Democrat party from rising up against him and at the same time keep the right wing of the Democrat party from doing the same thing. How many more will die before Obama figures out how to put himself in the best political light. So, in your view no matter what Obama decides, it's purely going to be a political decision, thus he's unpatriotic. That's where you're headed right? With Obama it will always be political. Ask him where his US flag pin was? Why didn't he put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance? Obama doesn't want to see the USA thrive.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hoooo BOY!!! Right out of Rush's playbook..... Do you really listen to Rush that often, cause most here consider him an entertainer like Jeff Dunham.. Maybe you are just trying to insult us, I donno' but it really isn't working... Jeff Dunham is really cool. When Harry posts I can't help getting a mental picture of his character, Walter. I'm working on an image for plume too. Olive Oyl, Tinkerbell, or Miss Piggy? What do you think? Lady Ga ga... |
8 more...
On 10/29/09 5:50 PM, Tosk wrote:
In , says... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. If you haven't guessed by now, JpS is..............................well.............. ................um................................ ...........gay Have him send you a snapshot. Let us know if you think he's hot. He won't send a snapshot. These guys are so embarrassed by the way they act here, they are scared to death somebody might identify them and their friends will find out what liars and idiots they are... I'd be embarrassed if I looked like Tosky: http://tinyurl.com/mrolrg |
8 more...
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:16:49 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/29/09 5:50 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. If you haven't guessed by now, JpS is..............................well.............. ................um................................ ...........gay Have him send you a snapshot. Let us know if you think he's hot. He won't send a snapshot. These guys are so embarrassed by the way they act here, they are scared to death somebody might identify them and their friends will find out what liars and idiots they are... I'd be embarrassed if I looked like Tosky: http://tinyurl.com/mrolrg That's got to be his dad or his uncle. He doesn't really look like that does he? Yikes. |
8 more...
On 10/29/09 7:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:16:49 -0400, H the wrote: On 10/29/09 5:50 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. If you haven't guessed by now, JpS is..............................well.............. ................um................................ ...........gay Have him send you a snapshot. Let us know if you think he's hot. He won't send a snapshot. These guys are so embarrassed by the way they act here, they are scared to death somebody might identify them and their friends will find out what liars and idiots they are... I'd be embarrassed if I looked like Tosky: http://tinyurl.com/mrolrg That's got to be his dad or his uncle. He doesn't really look like that does he? Yikes. It's him...formidable, eh? :) |
8 more...
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:34:53 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/29/09 7:48 PM, jps wrote: On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:16:49 -0400, H the wrote: On 10/29/09 5:50 PM, Tosk wrote: In , says... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:46:11 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Now you are starting to understand why I plonked this one too. Useless and I cut down the dimwit posts by about 50% right there. She posts almost as much as our Harry, and with about as much content.. ZERO... Thank you, thank you!! You obviously made him think. Cannot abide. I commend your patience but I think you were trying to de-gay him. Mother nature made him that way. De-gay? heh I had a friend who tried to do that with a really hot gay guy. It didn't work. If you haven't guessed by now, JpS is..............................well.............. ................um................................ ...........gay Have him send you a snapshot. Let us know if you think he's hot. He won't send a snapshot. These guys are so embarrassed by the way they act here, they are scared to death somebody might identify them and their friends will find out what liars and idiots they are... I'd be embarrassed if I looked like Tosky: http://tinyurl.com/mrolrg That's got to be his dad or his uncle. He doesn't really look like that does he? Yikes. It's him...formidable, eh? :) Looks like a double-wide brat with twigs for arms. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com